如果…怎么办?

Sherwood C. Frey
{"title":"如果…怎么办?","authors":"Sherwood C. Frey","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1dv0vnc.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note develops a variety of approaches to sensitivity analysis within the context of a promotional decision regarding a consumer product. Analyses include the development of optimistic/pessimistic scenarios, one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis with a presentation in the format of a tornado diagram, and threshold (break-even) values. Excerpt UVA-QA-0528 WHAT IF . . . ? A proactive decision maker should not limit the evaluation of an alternative to a single estimate of its potential performance, but should acknowledge explicitly the uncertainties that affect that performance. The consideration of the spectrum of possibilities to which an alternative's performance may be subjected can lead to a better understanding of the risks involved in pursuing the alternative. That understanding can in turn motivate the search for new alternatives that reduce those risks. This note will present approaches for exploring and presenting the sensitivity of performance to changes in assessments. These methods will assist in identifying and communicating the key drivers of performance so that future analysis can be focused on them and creative attention directed to reducing their effects. The following example will be used to develop and illustrate the language, tools, and techniques of this note: Suppose you are the product manager for a children's breakfast cereal. A special holiday trinket was recently developed, and you are considering including the trinket in your product's 28-ounce box during the two months preceding the holiday season. The trinket has performed extraordinarily well in a full battery of children's preference panels and is expected to result in a 12 percent increase in volume. Children's test panels are notoriously unreliable, however, and the increase could be anywhere between 8 and 14 percent. Without the trinket, sales of the 28-ounce box during the two-month period are forecasted to be 6.5 million boxes, plus or minus 2 percent. The production process and the distribution system are sufficiently flexible to permit production to match demand. The trinket will cost $ 0.10 per unit, if the supplier who has worked on its development can resume production in a timely fashion after a recent fire. Fortunately, alternative sources have been found, but at a premium of either $ 0.010 or $ 0.015 per unit, depending on the final selection of the alternative vendor. The trinket will be featured on the front and back of the box and the alteration to the box's artwork is anticipated to cost $ 125,000. Neither the art layout nor the production modifications have been finalized, and it is believed the final cost could range from 20 percent higher to 5 percent lower than the initial estimate. The 28-ounce box has a unit contribution of $ 1.48 per box. Would you include the trinket in the boxes for the holiday season? . . .","PeriodicalId":124895,"journal":{"name":"EduRN: Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Education (ERPN) (Topic)","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What If...?\",\"authors\":\"Sherwood C. Frey\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1dv0vnc.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This note develops a variety of approaches to sensitivity analysis within the context of a promotional decision regarding a consumer product. Analyses include the development of optimistic/pessimistic scenarios, one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis with a presentation in the format of a tornado diagram, and threshold (break-even) values. Excerpt UVA-QA-0528 WHAT IF . . . ? A proactive decision maker should not limit the evaluation of an alternative to a single estimate of its potential performance, but should acknowledge explicitly the uncertainties that affect that performance. The consideration of the spectrum of possibilities to which an alternative's performance may be subjected can lead to a better understanding of the risks involved in pursuing the alternative. That understanding can in turn motivate the search for new alternatives that reduce those risks. This note will present approaches for exploring and presenting the sensitivity of performance to changes in assessments. These methods will assist in identifying and communicating the key drivers of performance so that future analysis can be focused on them and creative attention directed to reducing their effects. The following example will be used to develop and illustrate the language, tools, and techniques of this note: Suppose you are the product manager for a children's breakfast cereal. A special holiday trinket was recently developed, and you are considering including the trinket in your product's 28-ounce box during the two months preceding the holiday season. The trinket has performed extraordinarily well in a full battery of children's preference panels and is expected to result in a 12 percent increase in volume. Children's test panels are notoriously unreliable, however, and the increase could be anywhere between 8 and 14 percent. Without the trinket, sales of the 28-ounce box during the two-month period are forecasted to be 6.5 million boxes, plus or minus 2 percent. The production process and the distribution system are sufficiently flexible to permit production to match demand. The trinket will cost $ 0.10 per unit, if the supplier who has worked on its development can resume production in a timely fashion after a recent fire. Fortunately, alternative sources have been found, but at a premium of either $ 0.010 or $ 0.015 per unit, depending on the final selection of the alternative vendor. The trinket will be featured on the front and back of the box and the alteration to the box's artwork is anticipated to cost $ 125,000. Neither the art layout nor the production modifications have been finalized, and it is believed the final cost could range from 20 percent higher to 5 percent lower than the initial estimate. The 28-ounce box has a unit contribution of $ 1.48 per box. Would you include the trinket in the boxes for the holiday season? . . .\",\"PeriodicalId\":124895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EduRN: Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Education (ERPN) (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EduRN: Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Education (ERPN) (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1dv0vnc.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EduRN: Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Education (ERPN) (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1dv0vnc.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了在消费品促销决策的背景下进行敏感性分析的各种方法。分析包括乐观/悲观场景的开发,以龙卷风图的形式进行一次一次的敏感性分析,以及阈值(收支平衡)值。摘录如果……? 一个积极主动的决策者不应该把对备选方案的评价局限于对其潜在性能的单一估计,而应该明确承认影响该性能的不确定性。考虑备选方案绩效可能受到的各种可能性,可以更好地理解追求备选方案所涉及的风险。这种理解反过来又能激励人们寻找新的替代方案,以降低这些风险。本说明将介绍探索和介绍绩效对评估变化的敏感性的方法。这些方法将有助于确定和沟通绩效的关键驱动因素,以便将来的分析可以集中在这些因素上,并将创造性的注意力集中在减少其影响上。下面的示例将用于开发和说明本文的语言、工具和技术:假设您是一家儿童早餐麦片公司的产品经理。最近开发了一种特殊的节日饰品,您正在考虑在假期前两个月将该饰品放入您的28盎司产品盒中。这款小饰品在儿童偏好面板的全套测试中表现出色,预计销量将增长12%。然而,儿童测试小组是出了名的不可靠,这一增长可能在8%到14%之间。如果没有这个小饰品,在两个月的时间里,这个28盎司的盒子的销量预计将达到650万盒,上下浮动2%。生产过程和分配系统足够灵活,可以使生产满足需求。如果供应商在最近的火灾后能够及时恢复生产,这个小饰品的单价将为0.10美元。幸运的是,已经找到了替代来源,但每单位的溢价为0.010美元或0.015美元,这取决于替代供应商的最终选择。这个小饰品将出现在盒子的正面和背面,而对盒子艺术品的修改预计将花费12.5万美元。美术布局和生产修改都没有最终确定,据信最终的成本可能比最初的估计高出20%到5%。这个28盎司的盒子每盒有1.48美元的单位贡献。你会把这些小饰品放在假期的盒子里吗?……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What If...?
This note develops a variety of approaches to sensitivity analysis within the context of a promotional decision regarding a consumer product. Analyses include the development of optimistic/pessimistic scenarios, one-at-a-time sensitivity analysis with a presentation in the format of a tornado diagram, and threshold (break-even) values. Excerpt UVA-QA-0528 WHAT IF . . . ? A proactive decision maker should not limit the evaluation of an alternative to a single estimate of its potential performance, but should acknowledge explicitly the uncertainties that affect that performance. The consideration of the spectrum of possibilities to which an alternative's performance may be subjected can lead to a better understanding of the risks involved in pursuing the alternative. That understanding can in turn motivate the search for new alternatives that reduce those risks. This note will present approaches for exploring and presenting the sensitivity of performance to changes in assessments. These methods will assist in identifying and communicating the key drivers of performance so that future analysis can be focused on them and creative attention directed to reducing their effects. The following example will be used to develop and illustrate the language, tools, and techniques of this note: Suppose you are the product manager for a children's breakfast cereal. A special holiday trinket was recently developed, and you are considering including the trinket in your product's 28-ounce box during the two months preceding the holiday season. The trinket has performed extraordinarily well in a full battery of children's preference panels and is expected to result in a 12 percent increase in volume. Children's test panels are notoriously unreliable, however, and the increase could be anywhere between 8 and 14 percent. Without the trinket, sales of the 28-ounce box during the two-month period are forecasted to be 6.5 million boxes, plus or minus 2 percent. The production process and the distribution system are sufficiently flexible to permit production to match demand. The trinket will cost $ 0.10 per unit, if the supplier who has worked on its development can resume production in a timely fashion after a recent fire. Fortunately, alternative sources have been found, but at a premium of either $ 0.010 or $ 0.015 per unit, depending on the final selection of the alternative vendor. The trinket will be featured on the front and back of the box and the alteration to the box's artwork is anticipated to cost $ 125,000. Neither the art layout nor the production modifications have been finalized, and it is believed the final cost could range from 20 percent higher to 5 percent lower than the initial estimate. The 28-ounce box has a unit contribution of $ 1.48 per box. Would you include the trinket in the boxes for the holiday season? . . .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
What If...? Enchanting Travels The Effect of Entrepreneurship Education, Self Effication, and Locus of Control on Entrepreneurship An Empirical Study of the Influence of Continuing Education on Youth Entrepreneurship in Taiwan Brand Image, Satisfaction and Trust As a Lead to Brand Loyalty: The Mediator Effect of Brand Relationship
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1