{"title":"元启发式设计模式:候选解决方案修复","authors":"K. Krawiec","doi":"10.1145/2598394.2609847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In metaheuristic algorithms applied to certain problems, it may be difficult to design search operators that guarantee producing feasible search points. In such cases, it may be more efficient to allow a search operator to yield an infeasible solution, and then turn it into a feasible one using a repair process. This paper is an attempt to provide a broad perspective on the candidate solution repair and frame it as a metaheuristic design pattern.","PeriodicalId":298232,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Metaheuristic design pattern: candidate solution repair\",\"authors\":\"K. Krawiec\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2598394.2609847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In metaheuristic algorithms applied to certain problems, it may be difficult to design search operators that guarantee producing feasible search points. In such cases, it may be more efficient to allow a search operator to yield an infeasible solution, and then turn it into a feasible one using a repair process. This paper is an attempt to provide a broad perspective on the candidate solution repair and frame it as a metaheuristic design pattern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2598394.2609847\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2598394.2609847","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In metaheuristic algorithms applied to certain problems, it may be difficult to design search operators that guarantee producing feasible search points. In such cases, it may be more efficient to allow a search operator to yield an infeasible solution, and then turn it into a feasible one using a repair process. This paper is an attempt to provide a broad perspective on the candidate solution repair and frame it as a metaheuristic design pattern.