PBL和DRTA对小学生批判性思维和阅读理解的影响

Arief Cahyo Utomo, K. Syamsi
{"title":"PBL和DRTA对小学生批判性思维和阅读理解的影响","authors":"Arief Cahyo Utomo, K. Syamsi","doi":"10.2991/ICCIE-18.2019.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to know the difference in effectiveness between the PBL and DRTA in terms of critical thinking and reading comprehension in elementary school. This study is a quasi experiment research. The subject of research is the elementary school students. The instruments used were the utilization of the test. The data collected is the data of reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. The datawas analyzed with the MANOVA with the assistance of of SPSS program. The results showed that there was a difference inthe effectiveness between the PBL and DRTA. Increased critical thinking skills of second grade experiment was 35.74% for class 1 using PBL and 72.75% to class 2 using DRTA. In regard to the improvement of reading comprehension in the experimental class 1 class with PBL, the result was 42.13% and experimental class 2 with DRTA was","PeriodicalId":331771,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018)","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of PBL and DRTA on Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension to Students in Elementary School\",\"authors\":\"Arief Cahyo Utomo, K. Syamsi\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ICCIE-18.2019.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to know the difference in effectiveness between the PBL and DRTA in terms of critical thinking and reading comprehension in elementary school. This study is a quasi experiment research. The subject of research is the elementary school students. The instruments used were the utilization of the test. The data collected is the data of reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. The datawas analyzed with the MANOVA with the assistance of of SPSS program. The results showed that there was a difference inthe effectiveness between the PBL and DRTA. Increased critical thinking skills of second grade experiment was 35.74% for class 1 using PBL and 72.75% to class 2 using DRTA. In regard to the improvement of reading comprehension in the experimental class 1 class with PBL, the result was 42.13% and experimental class 2 with DRTA was\",\"PeriodicalId\":331771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICCIE-18.2019.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICCIE-18.2019.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在了解PBL和DRTA在小学批判性思维和阅读理解方面的有效性差异。本研究为准实验研究。本研究的对象是小学生。所使用的仪器是对测试的利用。收集的数据是阅读理解和批判性思维技能的数据。利用SPSS软件对数据进行方差分析。结果表明,PBL和DRTA在疗效上存在差异。二年级实验中,使用PBL的1班批判性思维能力提高35.74%,使用DRTA的2班批判性思维能力提高72.75%。实验1班采用PBL的学生阅读理解能力提高了42.13%,实验2班采用DRTA的学生阅读理解能力提高了42.13%
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of PBL and DRTA on Critical Thinking and Reading Comprehension to Students in Elementary School
This research aims to know the difference in effectiveness between the PBL and DRTA in terms of critical thinking and reading comprehension in elementary school. This study is a quasi experiment research. The subject of research is the elementary school students. The instruments used were the utilization of the test. The data collected is the data of reading comprehension and critical thinking skills. The datawas analyzed with the MANOVA with the assistance of of SPSS program. The results showed that there was a difference inthe effectiveness between the PBL and DRTA. Increased critical thinking skills of second grade experiment was 35.74% for class 1 using PBL and 72.75% to class 2 using DRTA. In regard to the improvement of reading comprehension in the experimental class 1 class with PBL, the result was 42.13% and experimental class 2 with DRTA was
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Professionalism and Work Ethic Improvement through Teacher Working Group The Role of Group Counseling Service Using Brainstorming Technique in Improving Students’ Learning Independence Students’ Politeness Language Use in Elementary Schools in Mataram City Implementation of Blended Learning to Improve Fifth Graders’ Learning Participation The Development Task of Students In Islamic Boarding School
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1