中国如何以牺牲在中国和其他国家开展业务的跨国公司为代价来促进国有企业的发展

D. Chow
{"title":"中国如何以牺牲在中国和其他国家开展业务的跨国公司为代价来促进国有企业的发展","authors":"D. Chow","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2669503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"China’s mercantilist approach towards international business and trade uses a two pronged strategy to promote China’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs) at the expense of multinational companies (MNCs) doing business in China and other foreign countries. Within its borders, China uses the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (AUCL) to pressure, harass, and intimidate MNCs. China uses the AML to coerce MNCs to transfer assets to SOEs, provide access to their advanced technologies to Chinese companies, and to protect famous Chinese brands from being acquired by foreign companies. China has also used the AUCL and various associated laws to crack down on commercial bribery by MNCs using dawn raids and other heavy handed tactics.Outside of its borders, China uses free trade agreements with its trading partners that do not contain provisions relating to workers’ rights, the environment, and transparency in government. China’s SOEs are also not being prosecuted for bribing foreign officials in exchange for business opportunities. By contrast, U.S.-based MNCs are subject to myriad restrictions on their conduct abroad by a complex set of federal laws, including treaties imposing obligations concerning workers’ rights, the environment, and transparency. Bribery of foreign officials by U.S.-based MNCs is subject to intense scrutiny by U.S. authorities. China’s lack of restrictions on SOEs allows them to do business abroad at lower costs and with almost complete freedom on how they wish to conduct their business activities. While China is slowly and quietly creating SOEs that will dominate international business, the international business community does not seem to have taken much notice and may not realize this development until China’s SOEs become so powerful that there may little if anything that can be done to curtail their dominance.","PeriodicalId":137430,"journal":{"name":"Asian Law eJournal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How China Promotes Its State-Owned Enterprises at the Expense of Multinational Companies Doing Business in China and in Other Countries\",\"authors\":\"D. Chow\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.2669503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"China’s mercantilist approach towards international business and trade uses a two pronged strategy to promote China’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs) at the expense of multinational companies (MNCs) doing business in China and other foreign countries. Within its borders, China uses the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (AUCL) to pressure, harass, and intimidate MNCs. China uses the AML to coerce MNCs to transfer assets to SOEs, provide access to their advanced technologies to Chinese companies, and to protect famous Chinese brands from being acquired by foreign companies. China has also used the AUCL and various associated laws to crack down on commercial bribery by MNCs using dawn raids and other heavy handed tactics.Outside of its borders, China uses free trade agreements with its trading partners that do not contain provisions relating to workers’ rights, the environment, and transparency in government. China’s SOEs are also not being prosecuted for bribing foreign officials in exchange for business opportunities. By contrast, U.S.-based MNCs are subject to myriad restrictions on their conduct abroad by a complex set of federal laws, including treaties imposing obligations concerning workers’ rights, the environment, and transparency. Bribery of foreign officials by U.S.-based MNCs is subject to intense scrutiny by U.S. authorities. China’s lack of restrictions on SOEs allows them to do business abroad at lower costs and with almost complete freedom on how they wish to conduct their business activities. While China is slowly and quietly creating SOEs that will dominate international business, the international business community does not seem to have taken much notice and may not realize this development until China’s SOEs become so powerful that there may little if anything that can be done to curtail their dominance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":137430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Law eJournal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2669503\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2669503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

中国对国际商业和贸易的重商主义做法采用了双管齐下的策略,以牺牲在中国和其他国家开展业务的跨国公司为代价,促进中国国有企业(soe)的发展。在国内,中国利用《反垄断法》(AML)和《反不正当竞争法》(AUCL)对跨国公司施压、骚扰和恐吓。中国利用《反垄断法》迫使跨国公司向国有企业转让资产,向中国公司提供其先进技术,并保护中国著名品牌不被外国公司收购。中国还利用反垄断法和各种相关法律,通过黎明突袭和其他严厉手段打击跨国公司的商业贿赂行为。在境外,中国与贸易伙伴签订的自由贸易协定不包含与工人权利、环境和政府透明度有关的条款。中国的国有企业也不会因贿赂外国官员以换取商业机会而受到起诉。相比之下,总部设在美国的跨国公司在海外的行为受到一系列复杂的联邦法律的无数限制,包括规定有关工人权利、环境和透明度义务的条约。总部位于美国的跨国公司对外国官员的贿赂行为受到美国当局的严格审查。中国对国有企业没有限制,这使它们能够以较低的成本在海外开展业务,并几乎完全自由地开展业务活动。虽然中国正在缓慢而悄无声息地创建将主导国际商业的国有企业,但国际商界似乎并没有注意到这一点,直到中国的国有企业变得如此强大,以至于几乎无法采取任何措施来削弱它们的主导地位,它们才可能意识到这一发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How China Promotes Its State-Owned Enterprises at the Expense of Multinational Companies Doing Business in China and in Other Countries
China’s mercantilist approach towards international business and trade uses a two pronged strategy to promote China’s state-owned enterprises (SOEs) at the expense of multinational companies (MNCs) doing business in China and other foreign countries. Within its borders, China uses the Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) and the Anti-Unfair Competition Law (AUCL) to pressure, harass, and intimidate MNCs. China uses the AML to coerce MNCs to transfer assets to SOEs, provide access to their advanced technologies to Chinese companies, and to protect famous Chinese brands from being acquired by foreign companies. China has also used the AUCL and various associated laws to crack down on commercial bribery by MNCs using dawn raids and other heavy handed tactics.Outside of its borders, China uses free trade agreements with its trading partners that do not contain provisions relating to workers’ rights, the environment, and transparency in government. China’s SOEs are also not being prosecuted for bribing foreign officials in exchange for business opportunities. By contrast, U.S.-based MNCs are subject to myriad restrictions on their conduct abroad by a complex set of federal laws, including treaties imposing obligations concerning workers’ rights, the environment, and transparency. Bribery of foreign officials by U.S.-based MNCs is subject to intense scrutiny by U.S. authorities. China’s lack of restrictions on SOEs allows them to do business abroad at lower costs and with almost complete freedom on how they wish to conduct their business activities. While China is slowly and quietly creating SOEs that will dominate international business, the international business community does not seem to have taken much notice and may not realize this development until China’s SOEs become so powerful that there may little if anything that can be done to curtail their dominance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Debate on Constitutional Standing and Greater Autonomy for Cities: Lessons from The Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macao Agility Over Stability: China’s Great Reversal in Regulating the Platform Economy The Governance Crisis in Myanmar: An International Law Perspective and International Society Response Towards Myanmar 2021 Coup D’ Etat. Vietnam: Data Privacy in a Communist ASEAN State India's Cartel Penalty Practices, Optimal Restitution and Deterrence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1