可视化和形式化风险信息:一个实验

J. Kontio, J. Jokinen, E. Rosendahl
{"title":"可视化和形式化风险信息:一个实验","authors":"J. Kontio, J. Jokinen, E. Rosendahl","doi":"10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An essential element of software engineering risk management is the conceptualization of potential risks to a project. It is the basis of risk analysis and, even more importantly, it strongly influences how risks are communicated and understood by participants in a project. We report the results of a study where different risk visualization and documentation methods were compared in a controlled experiment with students. The study indicated that a defined and sufficiently expressive visualization approach can help capture more of the risk information than less formal methods. At the same time, participants felt that the more formal approaches were not more difficult to either learn or use than less formal ones. The SEI risks statements turned out to be inferior to other methods in most comparisons.","PeriodicalId":261807,"journal":{"name":"10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, 2004. Proceedings.","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Visualizing and formalizing risk information: an experiment\",\"authors\":\"J. Kontio, J. Jokinen, E. Rosendahl\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An essential element of software engineering risk management is the conceptualization of potential risks to a project. It is the basis of risk analysis and, even more importantly, it strongly influences how risks are communicated and understood by participants in a project. We report the results of a study where different risk visualization and documentation methods were compared in a controlled experiment with students. The study indicated that a defined and sufficiently expressive visualization approach can help capture more of the risk information than less formal methods. At the same time, participants felt that the more formal approaches were not more difficult to either learn or use than less formal ones. The SEI risks statements turned out to be inferior to other methods in most comparisons.\",\"PeriodicalId\":261807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, 2004. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, 2004. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357903\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th International Symposium on Software Metrics, 2004. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.2004.1357903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

软件工程风险管理的一个基本要素是对项目的潜在风险进行概念化。它是风险分析的基础,甚至更重要的是,它强烈地影响着项目参与者如何沟通和理解风险。我们报告了一项研究的结果,其中不同的风险可视化和记录方法在学生的对照实验中进行了比较。研究表明,与不太正式的方法相比,一个明确的、充分表达的可视化方法可以帮助捕获更多的风险信息。同时,与会者认为,较正式的方法并不比较不正式的方法更难学习或使用。在大多数比较中,SEI风险声明被证明不如其他方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Visualizing and formalizing risk information: an experiment
An essential element of software engineering risk management is the conceptualization of potential risks to a project. It is the basis of risk analysis and, even more importantly, it strongly influences how risks are communicated and understood by participants in a project. We report the results of a study where different risk visualization and documentation methods were compared in a controlled experiment with students. The study indicated that a defined and sufficiently expressive visualization approach can help capture more of the risk information than less formal methods. At the same time, participants felt that the more formal approaches were not more difficult to either learn or use than less formal ones. The SEI risks statements turned out to be inferior to other methods in most comparisons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The necessity of assuring quality in software measurement data Resource estimation for Web applications A survey on software estimation in the Norwegian industry A controlled experiment for evaluating a metric-based reading technique for requirements inspection Assessing usability through perceptions of information scent
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1