{"title":"联盟与党派分裂:评估笔记","authors":"L. M. D. A. Câmara","doi":"10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.205-221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The article presents a preliminary discussion about two different branches of the literature regarding the relation between the electoral system and legislative party system fragmentation in Brazil. One such approach emphasizes the role of coattail effects in shaping fragmentation, while the other focuses on district-level, pre-electoral coalition formation. In doing so, this study (i) compares Cox’s (1997) and Shugart and Carey (1992) discussions of Duverger’s work, in order to point out some frequently minimized differences between these two approaches; (ii) highlights the importance of those differences in understanding the brazilian case; and (iii) briefly discusses future lines of inquiry that could further the literature’s grasp both on the brazilian case specifically, and coattail effects more generally.","PeriodicalId":299944,"journal":{"name":"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COLIGAÇÕES E FRAGMENTAÇÃO PARTIDÁRIA: NOTAS PARA UM BALANÇO\",\"authors\":\"L. M. D. A. Câmara\",\"doi\":\"10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.205-221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": The article presents a preliminary discussion about two different branches of the literature regarding the relation between the electoral system and legislative party system fragmentation in Brazil. One such approach emphasizes the role of coattail effects in shaping fragmentation, while the other focuses on district-level, pre-electoral coalition formation. In doing so, this study (i) compares Cox’s (1997) and Shugart and Carey (1992) discussions of Duverger’s work, in order to point out some frequently minimized differences between these two approaches; (ii) highlights the importance of those differences in understanding the brazilian case; and (iii) briefly discusses future lines of inquiry that could further the literature’s grasp both on the brazilian case specifically, and coattail effects more generally.\",\"PeriodicalId\":299944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.205-221\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do Simpósio Interdisciplinar sobre o Sistema Político Brasileiro e XI Jornada de Pesquisa e Extensão da Câmara dos Deputados","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46550/978-65-89700-34-0.205-221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了关于巴西选举制度和立法政党制度分裂之间关系的两个不同分支文献的初步讨论。其中一种方法强调尾部效应在形成分裂方面的作用,而另一种方法侧重于地区一级选举前的联盟形成。在此过程中,本研究(i)比较了Cox(1997)和Shugart和Carey(1992)对Duverger作品的讨论,以指出这两种方法之间一些经常被最小化的差异;(ii)强调这些差异对理解巴西案例的重要性;(iii)简要讨论了未来的研究方向,这些方向可以进一步加深文献对巴西案例的具体把握,以及更普遍的尾部效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COLIGAÇÕES E FRAGMENTAÇÃO PARTIDÁRIA: NOTAS PARA UM BALANÇO
: The article presents a preliminary discussion about two different branches of the literature regarding the relation between the electoral system and legislative party system fragmentation in Brazil. One such approach emphasizes the role of coattail effects in shaping fragmentation, while the other focuses on district-level, pre-electoral coalition formation. In doing so, this study (i) compares Cox’s (1997) and Shugart and Carey (1992) discussions of Duverger’s work, in order to point out some frequently minimized differences between these two approaches; (ii) highlights the importance of those differences in understanding the brazilian case; and (iii) briefly discusses future lines of inquiry that could further the literature’s grasp both on the brazilian case specifically, and coattail effects more generally.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MULTI-OFFICE INCUMBENCY ADVANTAGE: POLITICAL CAREERS IN BRAZIL A CONSTITUCIONALIDADE DA REFORMA DA PREVIDÊNCIA DE 2003: COMO DECIDIRAM A CCJC E O STF? INDICADOR DE SIMILARIDADE DO DISCURSO PARLAMENTAR: ANÁLISE DO COMPORTAMENTO DAS COALIZÕES PARTIDÁRIAS IMPACTOS NA REPRESENTAÇÃO FEMININA DA CÂMARA DOS DEPUTADOS E DAS ASSEMBLEIAS LEGISLATIVAS COM ADOÇÃO DO DISTRITÃO QUEM RELATA? O PERFIL DOS RELATORES NA CDH DO SENADO FEDERAL (2005-2018)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1