粘土和红土砖用水泥稳定或不稳定的物理力学特性

M. Fall, D. Sarr, Elhadji Malick Cissé, D. Konate
{"title":"粘土和红土砖用水泥稳定或不稳定的物理力学特性","authors":"M. Fall, D. Sarr, Elhadji Malick Cissé, D. Konate","doi":"10.4236/OJCE.2021.111004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study focuses on the valuation and optimization \nof local materials to meet the challenge of sustainable development. Faced with \nclimate change and the preservation of the environment, research into \neco-materials is necessary to reduce the energy bill while ensuring comfort and \nsafety. The objective is to make a comparative characterization of the \nphysico-mechanical properties of compressed earth bricks made from local \nmaterials: clay, laterite and sand. These are, on the one hand, bricks made \nfrom clay and laterite, reinforced with a percentage of sand varying between 20% and 30% in steps of 5%., were made. \nOn the other hand, these same mixtures stabilized with 5% cement (CEM II-32.5) \nare also used to produce bricks. A characterization of the raw materials \nwas made before studying the physico-mechanical properties of the \nbricks themselves. This involved evaluating the water absorbency and \ncompressive strength of stabilized and unstabilized bricks. The results show \nthat the absorptivity of stabilized clay bricks is acceptable up to 25% \nsand because it is less than the 15% maximum value set by \nCameroonian standard NC-104: 2002-06. However, that of stabilized laterite \nbricks is higher than the maximum value set by the standard. The compressive \nstrengths, for clay bricks stabilized with 5% cement and for laterite bricks \nwith 0% sand added, are all greater than 2 MPa and therefore are acceptable. In \naddition, clay bricks with 20% sand and stabilized with 5% cement are \nrecommended because they have the most optimal physico-mechanical properties.","PeriodicalId":302856,"journal":{"name":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physico-Mechanical Characterization of Clay and Laterite Bricks Stabilized or Not with Cement\",\"authors\":\"M. Fall, D. Sarr, Elhadji Malick Cissé, D. Konate\",\"doi\":\"10.4236/OJCE.2021.111004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study focuses on the valuation and optimization \\nof local materials to meet the challenge of sustainable development. Faced with \\nclimate change and the preservation of the environment, research into \\neco-materials is necessary to reduce the energy bill while ensuring comfort and \\nsafety. The objective is to make a comparative characterization of the \\nphysico-mechanical properties of compressed earth bricks made from local \\nmaterials: clay, laterite and sand. These are, on the one hand, bricks made \\nfrom clay and laterite, reinforced with a percentage of sand varying between 20% and 30% in steps of 5%., were made. \\nOn the other hand, these same mixtures stabilized with 5% cement (CEM II-32.5) \\nare also used to produce bricks. A characterization of the raw materials \\nwas made before studying the physico-mechanical properties of the \\nbricks themselves. This involved evaluating the water absorbency and \\ncompressive strength of stabilized and unstabilized bricks. The results show \\nthat the absorptivity of stabilized clay bricks is acceptable up to 25% \\nsand because it is less than the 15% maximum value set by \\nCameroonian standard NC-104: 2002-06. However, that of stabilized laterite \\nbricks is higher than the maximum value set by the standard. The compressive \\nstrengths, for clay bricks stabilized with 5% cement and for laterite bricks \\nwith 0% sand added, are all greater than 2 MPa and therefore are acceptable. In \\naddition, clay bricks with 20% sand and stabilized with 5% cement are \\nrecommended because they have the most optimal physico-mechanical properties.\",\"PeriodicalId\":302856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJCE.2021.111004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/OJCE.2021.111004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的重点是对当地材料的评估和优化,以应对可持续发展的挑战。面对气候变化和环境保护,研究生态材料是必要的,以减少能源账单,同时确保舒适性和安全性。目的是对由当地材料粘土、红土和沙子制成的压缩土砖的物理力学特性进行比较。一方面,这些砖是由粘土和红土制成的,用沙子的比例在20%到30%之间,每隔5%进行加固。,是制造出来的。另一方面,用5%水泥(CEM II-32.5)稳定的相同混合物也用于生产砖。在研究砖本身的物理力学性能之前,对原材料进行了表征。这包括评估稳定和非稳定砖的吸水率和抗压强度。结果表明,稳定粘土砖在含砂25%的情况下,吸收率低于喀麦隆标准NC-104: 2002-06规定的15%的最大值,可以接受。而稳定红土砖则高于标准规定的最大值。5%水泥稳定的粘土砖和0%砂稳定的红土砖的抗压强度均大于2 MPa,可以接受。此外,由于粘土砖具有最佳的物理力学性能,因此建议使用含20%沙子和5%水泥稳定的粘土砖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Physico-Mechanical Characterization of Clay and Laterite Bricks Stabilized or Not with Cement
This study focuses on the valuation and optimization of local materials to meet the challenge of sustainable development. Faced with climate change and the preservation of the environment, research into eco-materials is necessary to reduce the energy bill while ensuring comfort and safety. The objective is to make a comparative characterization of the physico-mechanical properties of compressed earth bricks made from local materials: clay, laterite and sand. These are, on the one hand, bricks made from clay and laterite, reinforced with a percentage of sand varying between 20% and 30% in steps of 5%., were made. On the other hand, these same mixtures stabilized with 5% cement (CEM II-32.5) are also used to produce bricks. A characterization of the raw materials was made before studying the physico-mechanical properties of the bricks themselves. This involved evaluating the water absorbency and compressive strength of stabilized and unstabilized bricks. The results show that the absorptivity of stabilized clay bricks is acceptable up to 25% sand because it is less than the 15% maximum value set by Cameroonian standard NC-104: 2002-06. However, that of stabilized laterite bricks is higher than the maximum value set by the standard. The compressive strengths, for clay bricks stabilized with 5% cement and for laterite bricks with 0% sand added, are all greater than 2 MPa and therefore are acceptable. In addition, clay bricks with 20% sand and stabilized with 5% cement are recommended because they have the most optimal physico-mechanical properties.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Interchange Sight Distance and Design: Aspects and Implementation A Slip-Force Device for Maintaining Constant Lateral Pressure on Retaining Structures in Expansive Soils Practical Engineering Behavior of Egyptian Collapsible Soils, Laboratory and In-Situ Experimental Study Structural Health Monitoring for Reinforced Concrete Containment Using Inner Electrical Resistivity Method Hardening Properties of Foamed Concrete with Circulating Fluidized Bed Boiler Ash, Blast Furnace Slag, and Desulfurization Gypsum as the Binder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1