衡量精益和敏捷项目的成功:成本、时间、范围和质量同等重要吗?

Itai Lishner, A. Shtub
{"title":"衡量精益和敏捷项目的成功:成本、时间、范围和质量同等重要吗?","authors":"Itai Lishner, A. Shtub","doi":"10.19255/JMPM01908","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents the results of a survey conducted among managers from organizations that use Agile/Lean methodology for new product development. The study focused on the way these organizations measure the success of their projects. We found that most of the Agile/Lean projects failed to achieve the top criterion their organizations selected to evaluate the project success. We propose some tools designed to increase the probability of success based on the criteria selected by Lean and Agile project managers.","PeriodicalId":320094,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Modern Project Management","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the success of Lean and Agile projects: Are cost, time, scope and quality equally important?\",\"authors\":\"Itai Lishner, A. Shtub\",\"doi\":\"10.19255/JMPM01908\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents the results of a survey conducted among managers from organizations that use Agile/Lean methodology for new product development. The study focused on the way these organizations measure the success of their projects. We found that most of the Agile/Lean projects failed to achieve the top criterion their organizations selected to evaluate the project success. We propose some tools designed to increase the probability of success based on the criteria selected by Lean and Agile project managers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Modern Project Management\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Modern Project Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM01908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Modern Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM01908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本研究提出了一项对使用敏捷/精益方法进行新产品开发的组织的管理人员进行的调查的结果。研究的重点是这些组织衡量其项目成功的方式。我们发现,大多数敏捷/精益项目未能达到其组织选择的评估项目成功的最高标准。我们提出了一些基于精益和敏捷项目经理选择的标准来增加成功概率的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring the success of Lean and Agile projects: Are cost, time, scope and quality equally important?
This study presents the results of a survey conducted among managers from organizations that use Agile/Lean methodology for new product development. The study focused on the way these organizations measure the success of their projects. We found that most of the Agile/Lean projects failed to achieve the top criterion their organizations selected to evaluate the project success. We propose some tools designed to increase the probability of success based on the criteria selected by Lean and Agile project managers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Project recovery: Project failures and how to get rid of them Agile Enhancement of Critical PMBoK v6 Processes Whole Life Program Success, Leadership Competencies and Motivation for Learning – UK Defence Case Project Resource Optimization Considering Labor Productivity Factors Service based framework of research projects in higher education institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1