产品设计中的社会影响:对当前行业实践的探索

Andrew T. Pack, E. Phipps, C. Mattson, E. Dahlin
{"title":"产品设计中的社会影响:对当前行业实践的探索","authors":"Andrew T. Pack, E. Phipps, C. Mattson, E. Dahlin","doi":"10.1115/DETC2018-86170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though academic research for identifying and considering the social impact of products is emerging, the actual use of these processes in industry is undeclared in the literature. The gap between academic research and the industry adoption of these theories and methodologies can have real consequences. This paper explores current practices in industry that design engineers use to consider the social impact of products during the customer use stage. 30 people from nineteen different companies were interviewed to discover what disconnects exist between academia and industry when considering a product’s social impact. Although social impact assessments (SIA) and social life cycle assessments (SLCA) are two of the most common evaluative processes discussed in the literature, not a single company interviewed used either of these processes despite affirming that they do consider social impact in product design. Predictive processes were discussed by the respondents that tended to be developed within the company and often related to government regulations.","PeriodicalId":138856,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Impact in Product Design: An Exploration of Current Industry Practices\",\"authors\":\"Andrew T. Pack, E. Phipps, C. Mattson, E. Dahlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/DETC2018-86170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though academic research for identifying and considering the social impact of products is emerging, the actual use of these processes in industry is undeclared in the literature. The gap between academic research and the industry adoption of these theories and methodologies can have real consequences. This paper explores current practices in industry that design engineers use to consider the social impact of products during the customer use stage. 30 people from nineteen different companies were interviewed to discover what disconnects exist between academia and industry when considering a product’s social impact. Although social impact assessments (SIA) and social life cycle assessments (SLCA) are two of the most common evaluative processes discussed in the literature, not a single company interviewed used either of these processes despite affirming that they do consider social impact in product design. Predictive processes were discussed by the respondents that tended to be developed within the company and often related to government regulations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":138856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2A: 44th Design Automation Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2018-86170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

虽然识别和考虑产品的社会影响的学术研究正在兴起,但这些过程在工业中的实际使用在文献中未声明。学术研究和行业对这些理论和方法的采用之间的差距可能会产生真正的后果。本文探讨了设计工程师在客户使用阶段考虑产品的社会影响的当前工业实践。来自19家不同公司的30人接受了采访,以发现在考虑产品的社会影响时,学术界和工业界之间存在什么脱节。虽然社会影响评估(SIA)和社会生命周期评估(SLCA)是文献中讨论的两种最常见的评估过程,但没有一家受访公司使用这两种过程中的任何一种,尽管他们肯定会在产品设计中考虑社会影响。受访者讨论了预测流程,这些流程往往是在公司内部开发的,通常与政府法规有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Impact in Product Design: An Exploration of Current Industry Practices
Though academic research for identifying and considering the social impact of products is emerging, the actual use of these processes in industry is undeclared in the literature. The gap between academic research and the industry adoption of these theories and methodologies can have real consequences. This paper explores current practices in industry that design engineers use to consider the social impact of products during the customer use stage. 30 people from nineteen different companies were interviewed to discover what disconnects exist between academia and industry when considering a product’s social impact. Although social impact assessments (SIA) and social life cycle assessments (SLCA) are two of the most common evaluative processes discussed in the literature, not a single company interviewed used either of these processes despite affirming that they do consider social impact in product design. Predictive processes were discussed by the respondents that tended to be developed within the company and often related to government regulations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
An Electricity Grid As an Agent-Based Market System: Exploring the Effects of Policy on Sustainability Ontology-Based Unified Representation of Dynamic Simulation Models in Engineering Design Reducing Evaluation Cost for Circuit Synthesis Using Active Learning Computational Design of a Personalized Artificial Spinal Disc for Additive Manufacturing With Physiological Rotational Motions Short-Term Load Forecasting With Different Aggregation Strategies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1