不同森林恢复管理对Vaia风暴影响地区径流和土壤侵蚀的影响

A. Andreoli, Felix Pitscheider, Alessio Rozzoni, E. Tomelleri, F. Comiti
{"title":"不同森林恢复管理对Vaia风暴影响地区径流和土壤侵蚀的影响","authors":"A. Andreoli, Felix Pitscheider, Alessio Rozzoni, E. Tomelleri, F. Comiti","doi":"10.1109/MetroAgriFor55389.2022.9965078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current study was carried out in a wind damaged forest area and it aims to estimate the effects of management strategies after storm events on runoff and sediment yield. In order to achieve the goal, four experimental plots have been established on an area hit by two windthrows in 2003 and 2018 (Vaia storm). Each plot bound an area of 27 m2 (4.5 m x 6 m) and is located on a 40% slope facing East, previously covered with subalpine spruce forest at about 1650 m asl. The considered forest treatments were (1) salvage logging and natural regeneration, (2) no intervention, and (3) salvage logging and artificial regeneration. We measured runoff and sediments yield from September 2020 to September 2022. Water and sediments mobilized in the experimental plots are convoyed in a 1 m3 tank where the content is weighted by a load cell, and a pressure transducer records the water level. An in-situ radar rain gauge measures cumulative precipitation and intensity. Moreover, sediments samples were collected twice a year, dried and sieved to obtain the percentage of organic material and the texture of the eroded soil. The first results show a contrasting behaviour in terms of runoff/sediment yield between the four plots upon the occurrence of an intense precipitation event. The differences could be explained by the time passed after the windthrow, and the different forest treatments applied. These and future outcomes will be of paramount importance for adapting management strategies to an increasing frequency of subsequential extreme events (windthrow and precipitation).","PeriodicalId":374452,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor)","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different forest recovery management on runoff and soil erosion in an area affected by Vaia storm\",\"authors\":\"A. Andreoli, Felix Pitscheider, Alessio Rozzoni, E. Tomelleri, F. Comiti\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MetroAgriFor55389.2022.9965078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current study was carried out in a wind damaged forest area and it aims to estimate the effects of management strategies after storm events on runoff and sediment yield. In order to achieve the goal, four experimental plots have been established on an area hit by two windthrows in 2003 and 2018 (Vaia storm). Each plot bound an area of 27 m2 (4.5 m x 6 m) and is located on a 40% slope facing East, previously covered with subalpine spruce forest at about 1650 m asl. The considered forest treatments were (1) salvage logging and natural regeneration, (2) no intervention, and (3) salvage logging and artificial regeneration. We measured runoff and sediments yield from September 2020 to September 2022. Water and sediments mobilized in the experimental plots are convoyed in a 1 m3 tank where the content is weighted by a load cell, and a pressure transducer records the water level. An in-situ radar rain gauge measures cumulative precipitation and intensity. Moreover, sediments samples were collected twice a year, dried and sieved to obtain the percentage of organic material and the texture of the eroded soil. The first results show a contrasting behaviour in terms of runoff/sediment yield between the four plots upon the occurrence of an intense precipitation event. The differences could be explained by the time passed after the windthrow, and the different forest treatments applied. These and future outcomes will be of paramount importance for adapting management strategies to an increasing frequency of subsequential extreme events (windthrow and precipitation).\",\"PeriodicalId\":374452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 IEEE Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor)\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 IEEE Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAgriFor55389.2022.9965078\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE Workshop on Metrology for Agriculture and Forestry (MetroAgriFor)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MetroAgriFor55389.2022.9965078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究是在一个风损森林地区进行的,目的是估计风暴事件后管理策略对径流和沉积物产量的影响。为了实现这一目标,在2003年和2018年遭遇两次大风(Vaia风暴)的地区建立了四个试验区。每个地块的面积为27平方米(4.5米× 6米),位于面向东方的40%斜坡上,以前覆盖着海拔约1650米的亚高山云杉林。考虑的森林处理方法有:(1)回收采伐和自然更新,(2)不干预,(3)回收采伐和人工更新。我们测量了2020年9月至2022年9月的径流和沉积物产量。在实验区调动的水和沉积物被输送到一个1m3的水箱中,其中的内容物由称重传感器称重,压力传感器记录水位。现场雷达雨量计测量累积雨量和强度。此外,沉积物样品每年收集两次,干燥和筛选,以获得有机物质的百分比和侵蚀土壤的质地。第一个结果表明,在发生强烈降水事件时,四个样地之间的径流/沉积物产量有不同的行为。这种差异可以用大风过后的时间和不同的森林处理来解释。这些和未来的结果对于调整管理策略以适应随后日益频繁的极端事件(风力和降水)至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of different forest recovery management on runoff and soil erosion in an area affected by Vaia storm
The current study was carried out in a wind damaged forest area and it aims to estimate the effects of management strategies after storm events on runoff and sediment yield. In order to achieve the goal, four experimental plots have been established on an area hit by two windthrows in 2003 and 2018 (Vaia storm). Each plot bound an area of 27 m2 (4.5 m x 6 m) and is located on a 40% slope facing East, previously covered with subalpine spruce forest at about 1650 m asl. The considered forest treatments were (1) salvage logging and natural regeneration, (2) no intervention, and (3) salvage logging and artificial regeneration. We measured runoff and sediments yield from September 2020 to September 2022. Water and sediments mobilized in the experimental plots are convoyed in a 1 m3 tank where the content is weighted by a load cell, and a pressure transducer records the water level. An in-situ radar rain gauge measures cumulative precipitation and intensity. Moreover, sediments samples were collected twice a year, dried and sieved to obtain the percentage of organic material and the texture of the eroded soil. The first results show a contrasting behaviour in terms of runoff/sediment yield between the four plots upon the occurrence of an intense precipitation event. The differences could be explained by the time passed after the windthrow, and the different forest treatments applied. These and future outcomes will be of paramount importance for adapting management strategies to an increasing frequency of subsequential extreme events (windthrow and precipitation).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Treatment of dairy cattle slurry for biogas production and nitrogen recovery The efficiency of digestate as inoculum for in vitro digestibility of feeds Ion Mobility Spectrometry for Rapid HEMP Potency Testing - spectrometric testing of technical hemp A customizable and use friendly R package to process big data from the Tree Talker system Benefits of using production factors in assessing farm risk: a simulation on the role of irrigation data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1