侧面碰撞试验中车辆尖端稳定性分析。在:乘员和车辆对侧翻的反应

J. Zellner, S. A. Kebschull, R. V. Auken
{"title":"侧面碰撞试验中车辆尖端稳定性分析。在:乘员和车辆对侧翻的反应","authors":"J. Zellner, S. A. Kebschull, R. V. Auken","doi":"10.4271/2000-01-1650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter, on vehicle tip stability in side impact tests, is from a comprehensive textbook on occupant and vehicle responses in rollovers. The authors describe results of a preliminary analysis of vehicle tip-over potential in US/DOT/NHTSA Side Impact New Car Assessment Program (SINCAP) tests. The analyses included examination of related accident data, an analysis of potential sources of variability in the SINCAP tests, and a sensitivity analysis of vehicle and test facility parameters by means of multi-body computer simulation. Results showed that fatal accidents involved multi-vehicle rollover were the least frequent among four accident types examined (multivehicle no rollover, multivehicle rollover, single vehicle no rollover, and single vehicle rollover); SUVs had the lowest fatality rate in such accidents, among the four vehicle types examined (passenger cars, utility vehicles, passenger vans, pickup trucks). The authors report that tip-over occurrence in the SINCAP test was found to be very sensitive to several unspecified test facility characteristics, which may vary among test facilities. This could result in the possibility of \"tuning\" a vehicle for no tipover in the SINCAP tests, with little or potentially even harmful effects on actual occupant protection and vehicle safety. The authors conclude that the SINCAP test is not suitable for analyzing vehicle rollover potential or rollover safety.","PeriodicalId":291036,"journal":{"name":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","volume":"487 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALYSIS OF VEHICLE TIP STABILITY IN SIDE IMPACT TESTS. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS\",\"authors\":\"J. Zellner, S. A. Kebschull, R. V. Auken\",\"doi\":\"10.4271/2000-01-1650\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter, on vehicle tip stability in side impact tests, is from a comprehensive textbook on occupant and vehicle responses in rollovers. The authors describe results of a preliminary analysis of vehicle tip-over potential in US/DOT/NHTSA Side Impact New Car Assessment Program (SINCAP) tests. The analyses included examination of related accident data, an analysis of potential sources of variability in the SINCAP tests, and a sensitivity analysis of vehicle and test facility parameters by means of multi-body computer simulation. Results showed that fatal accidents involved multi-vehicle rollover were the least frequent among four accident types examined (multivehicle no rollover, multivehicle rollover, single vehicle no rollover, and single vehicle rollover); SUVs had the lowest fatality rate in such accidents, among the four vehicle types examined (passenger cars, utility vehicles, passenger vans, pickup trucks). The authors report that tip-over occurrence in the SINCAP test was found to be very sensitive to several unspecified test facility characteristics, which may vary among test facilities. This could result in the possibility of \\\"tuning\\\" a vehicle for no tipover in the SINCAP tests, with little or potentially even harmful effects on actual occupant protection and vehicle safety. The authors conclude that the SINCAP test is not suitable for analyzing vehicle rollover potential or rollover safety.\",\"PeriodicalId\":291036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers\",\"volume\":\"487 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-1650\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publication of: Society of Automotive Engineers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4271/2000-01-1650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

这一章,关于侧面碰撞试验中的车辆尖端稳定性,来自一本关于车辆侧翻时乘员和车辆反应的综合教科书。作者描述了美国交通部/美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)新车侧面碰撞评估计划(SINCAP)测试中对车辆翻倒可能性的初步分析结果。分析包括检查相关事故数据,分析SINCAP测试中潜在的变异性来源,以及通过多体计算机模拟对车辆和测试设施参数进行敏感性分析。结果表明:在多车无侧翻、多车无侧翻、单车无侧翻和单车侧翻4种事故类型中,涉及多车侧翻的致命事故发生率最低;在所调查的四种车辆类型(乘用车、多用途车、客货车、皮卡)中,suv在此类事故中的死亡率最低。作者报告说,在SINCAP试验中发生的翻倒被发现对几个未指定的试验设施特征非常敏感,这些特征可能因试验设施而异。这可能导致在SINCAP测试中对车辆进行“调整”,使其不出现倾倒力,而对实际乘员保护和车辆安全的影响很小,甚至可能有害。作者认为,SINCAP试验不适合分析车辆的侧翻潜力或侧翻安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ANALYSIS OF VEHICLE TIP STABILITY IN SIDE IMPACT TESTS. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS
This chapter, on vehicle tip stability in side impact tests, is from a comprehensive textbook on occupant and vehicle responses in rollovers. The authors describe results of a preliminary analysis of vehicle tip-over potential in US/DOT/NHTSA Side Impact New Car Assessment Program (SINCAP) tests. The analyses included examination of related accident data, an analysis of potential sources of variability in the SINCAP tests, and a sensitivity analysis of vehicle and test facility parameters by means of multi-body computer simulation. Results showed that fatal accidents involved multi-vehicle rollover were the least frequent among four accident types examined (multivehicle no rollover, multivehicle rollover, single vehicle no rollover, and single vehicle rollover); SUVs had the lowest fatality rate in such accidents, among the four vehicle types examined (passenger cars, utility vehicles, passenger vans, pickup trucks). The authors report that tip-over occurrence in the SINCAP test was found to be very sensitive to several unspecified test facility characteristics, which may vary among test facilities. This could result in the possibility of "tuning" a vehicle for no tipover in the SINCAP tests, with little or potentially even harmful effects on actual occupant protection and vehicle safety. The authors conclude that the SINCAP test is not suitable for analyzing vehicle rollover potential or rollover safety.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
INNOVATIVE CHIP SET FOR PRESSURE AND ACCELERATION BASED AIRBAG SOLUTIONS. IN: AIR BAGS AND BELT RESTRAINTS A STUDY OF DRIVER'S MANEUVER CHARACTERISTICS USING THE JOY-STICK DEVICE. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT BOUNCE-OVERS: FIXED OBJECT IMPACTS FOLLOWED BY ROLLOVERS. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS EVALUATION OF A VOICE-ACTIVATED SYSTEM USING A DRIVING SIMULATOR. IN: HUMAN FACTORS IN DRIVING AND TELEMATICS, AND SEATING COMFORT HOW TO USE PC-CRASH TO SIMULATE ROLLOVER CRASHES. IN: OCCUPANT AND VEHICLE RESPONSES IN ROLLOVERS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1