多目标稀疏优化问题膝点选择方法性能分析

Jing J. Liang, X. Zhu, C. Yue, Zhihui Li, B. Qu
{"title":"多目标稀疏优化问题膝点选择方法性能分析","authors":"Jing J. Liang, X. Zhu, C. Yue, Zhihui Li, B. Qu","doi":"10.1109/CEC.2018.8477915","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have been introduced to solve sparse optimization problems in recent years. These multi-objective sparse optimization algorithms obtain a set of solutions with different sparsities. However, for a specific sparse optimization problem, a unique sparse solution should be selected from the whole Pareto Set (PS). Usually, knee point in the PF is a preferred solution if the decision maker has no special preference. An effective knee point selection method plays a pivotal role in multi-objective sparse optimization. In this paper, a study on the knee point selection methods in multiobjective sparse optimization problems has been done. Three knee point selection methods, which are angle-based method, the weighted sum of objective values method and the distance to the extreme line method, are compared and the experimental results indicate that the second method is better than the others. Finally, an analysis of parameter in the best knee point selection method is conducted and an optimal setting range of parameters is given.","PeriodicalId":212677,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Analysis on Knee Point Selection Methods for Multi-Objective Sparse Optimization Problems\",\"authors\":\"Jing J. Liang, X. Zhu, C. Yue, Zhihui Li, B. Qu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CEC.2018.8477915\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have been introduced to solve sparse optimization problems in recent years. These multi-objective sparse optimization algorithms obtain a set of solutions with different sparsities. However, for a specific sparse optimization problem, a unique sparse solution should be selected from the whole Pareto Set (PS). Usually, knee point in the PF is a preferred solution if the decision maker has no special preference. An effective knee point selection method plays a pivotal role in multi-objective sparse optimization. In this paper, a study on the knee point selection methods in multiobjective sparse optimization problems has been done. Three knee point selection methods, which are angle-based method, the weighted sum of objective values method and the distance to the extreme line method, are compared and the experimental results indicate that the second method is better than the others. Finally, an analysis of parameter in the best knee point selection method is conducted and an optimal setting range of parameters is given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)\",\"volume\":\"126 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2018.8477915\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2018.8477915","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

近年来,一些多目标进化算法被引入求解稀疏优化问题。这些多目标稀疏优化算法得到一组具有不同稀疏度的解。然而,对于特定的稀疏优化问题,需要从整个Pareto集合(PS)中选择唯一的稀疏解。通常,在决策者没有特殊偏好的情况下,PF中的膝点是首选的解决方案。有效的膝点选择方法在多目标稀疏优化中起着至关重要的作用。本文研究了多目标稀疏优化问题中的拐点选择方法。比较了基于角度法、客观值加权和法和到极值线的距离法三种膝关节点选择方法,实验结果表明,基于角度法的膝关节点选择方法优于其他方法。最后,对最佳膝点选择方法中的参数进行了分析,给出了参数的最优设置范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Performance Analysis on Knee Point Selection Methods for Multi-Objective Sparse Optimization Problems
Some multi-objective evolutionary algorithms have been introduced to solve sparse optimization problems in recent years. These multi-objective sparse optimization algorithms obtain a set of solutions with different sparsities. However, for a specific sparse optimization problem, a unique sparse solution should be selected from the whole Pareto Set (PS). Usually, knee point in the PF is a preferred solution if the decision maker has no special preference. An effective knee point selection method plays a pivotal role in multi-objective sparse optimization. In this paper, a study on the knee point selection methods in multiobjective sparse optimization problems has been done. Three knee point selection methods, which are angle-based method, the weighted sum of objective values method and the distance to the extreme line method, are compared and the experimental results indicate that the second method is better than the others. Finally, an analysis of parameter in the best knee point selection method is conducted and an optimal setting range of parameters is given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Automatic Evolution of AutoEncoders for Compressed Representations Landscape-Based Differential Evolution for Constrained Optimization Problems A Novel Approach for Optimizing Ensemble Components in Rainfall Prediction A Many-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm with Fast Clustering and Reference Point Redistribution Manyobjective Optimization to Design Physical Topology of Optical Networks with Undefined Node Locations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1