FSV与FS-NMI指数的统计性能比较

M. Azpúrua, E. Paez, X. Parra, Ferran Silva, R. Jaúregui
{"title":"FSV与FS-NMI指数的统计性能比较","authors":"M. Azpúrua, E. Paez, X. Parra, Ferran Silva, R. Jaúregui","doi":"10.1109/ISEMC.2014.6898991","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a performance comparison between two validation methods developed specifically for the Computational Electromagnetics purposes: the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) and the Feature Selective Normalized Mutual Information (FSNMI) index. To achieve this goal, a statistical analysis of 40 different cases of study (pairs of data sets) is carried out covering a wide range of real-life applications, such as, frequency domain, noisy and transient data, among others. The results provided an insight of the relationships between each method, showing that more effort is required to achieve generally coherent validation results between the FSV and the FSNMI.","PeriodicalId":279929,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)","volume":"227 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statistical performance comparison between the FSV and the FS-NMI index\",\"authors\":\"M. Azpúrua, E. Paez, X. Parra, Ferran Silva, R. Jaúregui\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ISEMC.2014.6898991\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents a performance comparison between two validation methods developed specifically for the Computational Electromagnetics purposes: the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) and the Feature Selective Normalized Mutual Information (FSNMI) index. To achieve this goal, a statistical analysis of 40 different cases of study (pairs of data sets) is carried out covering a wide range of real-life applications, such as, frequency domain, noisy and transient data, among others. The results provided an insight of the relationships between each method, showing that more effort is required to achieve generally coherent validation results between the FSV and the FSNMI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)\",\"volume\":\"227 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2014.6898991\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISEMC.2014.6898991","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文介绍了专门为计算电磁学目的开发的两种验证方法:特征选择验证(FSV)和特征选择归一化互信息(FSNMI)索引之间的性能比较。为了实现这一目标,对40个不同的研究案例(数据集对)进行了统计分析,涵盖了广泛的现实应用,如频域、噪声和瞬态数据等。结果揭示了每种方法之间的关系,表明需要更多的努力才能在FSV和FSNMI之间获得普遍一致的验证结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statistical performance comparison between the FSV and the FS-NMI index
This paper presents a performance comparison between two validation methods developed specifically for the Computational Electromagnetics purposes: the Feature Selective Validation (FSV) and the Feature Selective Normalized Mutual Information (FSNMI) index. To achieve this goal, a statistical analysis of 40 different cases of study (pairs of data sets) is carried out covering a wide range of real-life applications, such as, frequency domain, noisy and transient data, among others. The results provided an insight of the relationships between each method, showing that more effort is required to achieve generally coherent validation results between the FSV and the FSNMI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of emission source microscopy technique to EMI source localization above 5 GHz Modeling of carbon nanotube-metal contact losses in electronic devices Integrated-circuit countermeasures against information leakage through EM radiation Over-the-air performance testing of a real 4G LTE base station in a reverberation chamber A common-mode active filter in a compact package for a switching mode power supply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1