同种异体骨与自体骨移植修复比格犬颅骨缺损的初步动物研究

Jung-Gon Lee, Sang-Yun Kim, P. Yun, Young-Kyun Kim
{"title":"同种异体骨与自体骨移植修复比格犬颅骨缺损的初步动物研究","authors":"Jung-Gon Lee, Sang-Yun Kim, P. Yun, Young-Kyun Kim","doi":"10.32542/implantology.20180006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing process af ter autogenous and allogenous bone grafts for calvarial bone defects in beagles. Materials and Methods: Two defects were formed in the skulls of two beagles and then grafted with a f reeze-dried bone allograf t (Double-Oss) and an autogenous bone chip, respectively. The clinical, radiographic, and histomorphometric examination results of the specimens taken 4 and 8 weeks after bone grafting were analyzed. Results: The clinical, radiographic, and histological assessments revealed that 4 and 8 weeks after transplant, the beagle that received an autogenous bone graft was more likely to have high new bone formation than the beagle that had an allogenous bone. Four weeks after the transplant, the proportions of new bone formation were 11.5% and 35.8% in the allogenous and autogenous bones, respectively. Eight weeks af ter the transplant, the proportion of new bone formation with the allogenous bone increased significantly to 41.4% but was still less than the 65.6% with the autogenous bone. Conclusion: The amount of new bone formation was smaller and the formation rate was slower with allogenous bone graft than with autogenous bone graft.","PeriodicalId":370954,"journal":{"name":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Healing of Allograft and Autogenous Bone Implanted in the Skull Defect of Beagle Dog: Preliminary Animal Study\",\"authors\":\"Jung-Gon Lee, Sang-Yun Kim, P. Yun, Young-Kyun Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.32542/implantology.20180006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing process af ter autogenous and allogenous bone grafts for calvarial bone defects in beagles. Materials and Methods: Two defects were formed in the skulls of two beagles and then grafted with a f reeze-dried bone allograf t (Double-Oss) and an autogenous bone chip, respectively. The clinical, radiographic, and histomorphometric examination results of the specimens taken 4 and 8 weeks after bone grafting were analyzed. Results: The clinical, radiographic, and histological assessments revealed that 4 and 8 weeks after transplant, the beagle that received an autogenous bone graft was more likely to have high new bone formation than the beagle that had an allogenous bone. Four weeks after the transplant, the proportions of new bone formation were 11.5% and 35.8% in the allogenous and autogenous bones, respectively. Eight weeks af ter the transplant, the proportion of new bone formation with the allogenous bone increased significantly to 41.4% but was still less than the 65.6% with the autogenous bone. Conclusion: The amount of new bone formation was smaller and the formation rate was slower with allogenous bone graft than with autogenous bone graft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":370954,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Implantology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32542/implantology.20180006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

版权所有©2018。韩国口腔颌面种植学会这是一篇基于知识共享署名非商业许可(http://creativecommons)的开放获取文章。(http://www.licenses/bync/4.0/),允许在任何媒介上不受限制地进行非商业使用、分发和复制,前提是正确引用原始作品。开放获取目的:本研究的目的是评估小猎犬颅骨骨缺损自体和异体骨移植后的愈合过程。材料与方法:在2只小猎犬的颅骨上形成2个缺损,分别用同种异体冻干骨移植体(Double-Oss)和自体骨芯片进行骨移植。分析植骨后4周和8周标本的临床、影像学和组织形态学检查结果。结果:临床、影像学和组织学评估显示,移植后4周和8周,接受自体骨移植的小猎犬比接受同种异体骨移植的小猎犬更有可能有较高的新骨形成。移植后4周,异体骨和自体骨的新骨成形率分别为11.5%和35.8%。移植后8周,同种异体骨的新骨形成比例显著增加至41.4%,但仍低于自体骨的65.6%。结论:与自体骨移植相比,同种异体骨移植的新生骨形成量更少,形成速度更慢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Healing of Allograft and Autogenous Bone Implanted in the Skull Defect of Beagle Dog: Preliminary Animal Study
Copyright © 2018. The Korean Academy of Oral & Maxillofacial Implantology This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons. org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. OPEN ACCESS Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the healing process af ter autogenous and allogenous bone grafts for calvarial bone defects in beagles. Materials and Methods: Two defects were formed in the skulls of two beagles and then grafted with a f reeze-dried bone allograf t (Double-Oss) and an autogenous bone chip, respectively. The clinical, radiographic, and histomorphometric examination results of the specimens taken 4 and 8 weeks after bone grafting were analyzed. Results: The clinical, radiographic, and histological assessments revealed that 4 and 8 weeks after transplant, the beagle that received an autogenous bone graft was more likely to have high new bone formation than the beagle that had an allogenous bone. Four weeks after the transplant, the proportions of new bone formation were 11.5% and 35.8% in the allogenous and autogenous bones, respectively. Eight weeks af ter the transplant, the proportion of new bone formation with the allogenous bone increased significantly to 41.4% but was still less than the 65.6% with the autogenous bone. Conclusion: The amount of new bone formation was smaller and the formation rate was slower with allogenous bone graft than with autogenous bone graft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mechanical Complications of Posterior Implant Restorations using CAD/CAM Titanium Customized Abutments: A Retrospective Study Comparison of Mechanical Properties of Milled and Casted Cobalt-Chromium Alloys Using Three-point Bending Test Atraumatic Removal of Displaced Implant in the Fatty Bony Marrow Orocutaneous Fistula after Implant Placement with Sinus Floor Elevation via Transalveolar Approach: A Case Report Fabricating an Implant-Supported Crown with Impression Scanning Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1