{"title":"用于项目风险优先级排序的热图风险矩阵的改进替代方案","authors":"J. P. Monat, Scott M. Doremus","doi":"10.19255/JMPM02211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a previous article we discussed the weaknesses of the popular heat map style risk matrix for project risk prioritization, and we proposed an alternative called the risk adjusted loss (RAL) method. Although the RAL method demonstrated significant improvement, there were mechanical as well as interpretive issues associated with it. This paper describes improvements to the RAL method and experimentally demonstrates its superiority over the heat map style risk matrix for prioritizing project risks.","PeriodicalId":320094,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Modern Project Management","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Improved Alternative to Heat Map Risk Matrices for Project Risk Prioritization\",\"authors\":\"J. P. Monat, Scott M. Doremus\",\"doi\":\"10.19255/JMPM02211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a previous article we discussed the weaknesses of the popular heat map style risk matrix for project risk prioritization, and we proposed an alternative called the risk adjusted loss (RAL) method. Although the RAL method demonstrated significant improvement, there were mechanical as well as interpretive issues associated with it. This paper describes improvements to the RAL method and experimentally demonstrates its superiority over the heat map style risk matrix for prioritizing project risks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":320094,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Modern Project Management\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Modern Project Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Modern Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19255/JMPM02211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
An Improved Alternative to Heat Map Risk Matrices for Project Risk Prioritization
In a previous article we discussed the weaknesses of the popular heat map style risk matrix for project risk prioritization, and we proposed an alternative called the risk adjusted loss (RAL) method. Although the RAL method demonstrated significant improvement, there were mechanical as well as interpretive issues associated with it. This paper describes improvements to the RAL method and experimentally demonstrates its superiority over the heat map style risk matrix for prioritizing project risks.