{"title":"移动设备上人脸检测算法的比较","authors":"Yishi Guo, B. Wünsche","doi":"10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Face detection is a fundamental task for many computer vision applications such as access control, security, advertisement, automatic payment, and healthcare. Due to technological advances mobile robots are becoming increasingly common in such applications (e.g. healthcare and security robots) and consequently there is a need for efficient and effective face detection methods on such platforms. Mobile robots have different hardware configurations and operating conditions from desktop applications, e.g. unreliable network connections and the need for lower power consumption. Hence results for face detection methods on desktop platforms cannot be directly translated to mobile platforms.We compare four common face detection algorithms, Viola-Jones, HOG, MTCNN and MobileNet-SSD, for use in mobile robotics using different face data bases. Our results show that for a typical mobile configuration (Nvidia Jetson TX2) Mobile-NetSSD performed best with 90% detection accuracy for the AFW data set and a frame rate of almost 10 fps with GPU acceleration. MTCNN had the highest precision and was superior for more difficult face data sets, but did not achieve real-time performance with the given implementation and hardware configuration.","PeriodicalId":164317,"journal":{"name":"2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ)","volume":"425 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Face Detection Algorithms on Mobile Devices\",\"authors\":\"Yishi Guo, B. Wünsche\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Face detection is a fundamental task for many computer vision applications such as access control, security, advertisement, automatic payment, and healthcare. Due to technological advances mobile robots are becoming increasingly common in such applications (e.g. healthcare and security robots) and consequently there is a need for efficient and effective face detection methods on such platforms. Mobile robots have different hardware configurations and operating conditions from desktop applications, e.g. unreliable network connections and the need for lower power consumption. Hence results for face detection methods on desktop platforms cannot be directly translated to mobile platforms.We compare four common face detection algorithms, Viola-Jones, HOG, MTCNN and MobileNet-SSD, for use in mobile robotics using different face data bases. Our results show that for a typical mobile configuration (Nvidia Jetson TX2) Mobile-NetSSD performed best with 90% detection accuracy for the AFW data set and a frame rate of almost 10 fps with GPU acceleration. MTCNN had the highest precision and was superior for more difficult face data sets, but did not achieve real-time performance with the given implementation and hardware configuration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ)\",\"volume\":\"425 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 35th International Conference on Image and Vision Computing New Zealand (IVCNZ)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IVCNZ51579.2020.9290542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
人脸检测是许多计算机视觉应用的基本任务,如访问控制、安全、广告、自动支付和医疗保健。由于技术的进步,移动机器人在这些应用中变得越来越普遍(例如医疗保健和安全机器人),因此需要在这些平台上高效和有效的面部检测方法。移动机器人的硬件配置和操作条件与桌面应用程序不同,例如不可靠的网络连接和对低功耗的需求。因此,桌面平台上人脸检测方法的结果不能直接转化到移动平台上。我们比较了四种常见的面部检测算法,Viola-Jones, HOG, MTCNN和MobileNet-SSD,用于使用不同面部数据库的移动机器人。我们的研究结果表明,对于典型的移动配置(Nvidia Jetson TX2), mobile - netssd在AFW数据集上表现最佳,检测准确率为90%,在GPU加速下帧率接近10 fps。MTCNN具有最高的精度,并且对于更困难的人脸数据集具有优势,但在给定的实现和硬件配置下无法实现实时性能。
Comparison of Face Detection Algorithms on Mobile Devices
Face detection is a fundamental task for many computer vision applications such as access control, security, advertisement, automatic payment, and healthcare. Due to technological advances mobile robots are becoming increasingly common in such applications (e.g. healthcare and security robots) and consequently there is a need for efficient and effective face detection methods on such platforms. Mobile robots have different hardware configurations and operating conditions from desktop applications, e.g. unreliable network connections and the need for lower power consumption. Hence results for face detection methods on desktop platforms cannot be directly translated to mobile platforms.We compare four common face detection algorithms, Viola-Jones, HOG, MTCNN and MobileNet-SSD, for use in mobile robotics using different face data bases. Our results show that for a typical mobile configuration (Nvidia Jetson TX2) Mobile-NetSSD performed best with 90% detection accuracy for the AFW data set and a frame rate of almost 10 fps with GPU acceleration. MTCNN had the highest precision and was superior for more difficult face data sets, but did not achieve real-time performance with the given implementation and hardware configuration.