成功vs有效的真正的管理者

F. Luthans
{"title":"成功vs有效的真正的管理者","authors":"F. Luthans","doi":"10.5465/AME.1988.4275524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"W hat do successful managers those who have been promoted relatively quickly have in common with effective managers those who have satisfied, committed subordinates and high performing units? Surprisingly, the answer seems to be that they have little in common. Successful managers in what we define as \"real organizations\" large and small mainstream organizations, mostly in the mushrooming service industry in middle America are not engaged in the same day-to-day activities as effective managers in these organizations. This is probably the most important, and certainly the most intriguing, finding of a comprehensive four-year observational study of managerial work that is reported in a recent book by myself and two colleagues, titled Real Managers.1 The startling finding that there is a difference between successful and effective managers may merely confirm for many cynics and \"passed over\" managers something they have suspected for years. They believe that although managers who are successful (that is, rapidly promoted) may be astute politicians, they are not necessarily effective. Indeed, the so-called successful managers may be the ones who do not in fact take care of people and get high performance from their units. Could this finding explain some of the performance problems facing American organizations today? Could it be that the successful managers, the politically savvy ones who are being rapidly promoted into responsible positions, may not be the effective managers, the ones with satisfied, committed subordinates turning out quantity and quality performance in their units? This article explores the heretofore assumed equivalence of \"successful managers\" and \"effective managers.\" Instead of looking for sophisticated technical or governmental approaches to the performance problems facing today's organizations, the solution may be as simple as promoting effective managers and learning how they carry out their jobs. Maybe it is time to turn to the real managers themselves for some answers. And who are these managers? They are found at all levels and in all types of organizations with titles such as department head, general manager, store manager, marketing manager, office manager, agency chief, or district manager. In other words, maybe the answers to the performance problems facing organizations today can be found in their own backyards, in the managers themselves in their day-today activities. The Current View of Managerial Work","PeriodicalId":337734,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Executive","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"269","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Successful vs. Effective Real Managers\",\"authors\":\"F. Luthans\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/AME.1988.4275524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"W hat do successful managers those who have been promoted relatively quickly have in common with effective managers those who have satisfied, committed subordinates and high performing units? Surprisingly, the answer seems to be that they have little in common. Successful managers in what we define as \\\"real organizations\\\" large and small mainstream organizations, mostly in the mushrooming service industry in middle America are not engaged in the same day-to-day activities as effective managers in these organizations. This is probably the most important, and certainly the most intriguing, finding of a comprehensive four-year observational study of managerial work that is reported in a recent book by myself and two colleagues, titled Real Managers.1 The startling finding that there is a difference between successful and effective managers may merely confirm for many cynics and \\\"passed over\\\" managers something they have suspected for years. They believe that although managers who are successful (that is, rapidly promoted) may be astute politicians, they are not necessarily effective. Indeed, the so-called successful managers may be the ones who do not in fact take care of people and get high performance from their units. Could this finding explain some of the performance problems facing American organizations today? Could it be that the successful managers, the politically savvy ones who are being rapidly promoted into responsible positions, may not be the effective managers, the ones with satisfied, committed subordinates turning out quantity and quality performance in their units? This article explores the heretofore assumed equivalence of \\\"successful managers\\\" and \\\"effective managers.\\\" Instead of looking for sophisticated technical or governmental approaches to the performance problems facing today's organizations, the solution may be as simple as promoting effective managers and learning how they carry out their jobs. Maybe it is time to turn to the real managers themselves for some answers. And who are these managers? They are found at all levels and in all types of organizations with titles such as department head, general manager, store manager, marketing manager, office manager, agency chief, or district manager. In other words, maybe the answers to the performance problems facing organizations today can be found in their own backyards, in the managers themselves in their day-today activities. The Current View of Managerial Work\",\"PeriodicalId\":337734,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Executive\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"269\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Executive\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1988.4275524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Executive","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.1988.4275524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 269

摘要

成功的管理者——那些升职相对较快的管理者——与那些拥有满意、忠诚的下属和高绩效单位的高效管理者有什么共同之处?令人惊讶的是,答案似乎是它们几乎没有共同之处。在我们所定义的“真正的组织”中,成功的管理者在大大小小的主流组织中,主要是在美国中部迅速发展的服务业中,与这些组织中有效的管理者所从事的日常活动不同。这可能是我和两位同事对管理工作进行了为期四年的全面观察研究后得出的最重要、当然也是最有趣的发现。我和两位同事最近出版了一本书,名为《真正的管理者》(Real managers)。关于成功的管理者和高效的管理者之间存在差异的惊人发现,可能只是证实了许多愤世嫉俗者和“被忽视”的管理者多年来一直怀疑的事情。他们认为,虽然成功的管理者(即迅速晋升的管理者)可能是精明的政治家,但他们不一定是有效率的。事实上,所谓成功的管理者可能是那些实际上并不关心员工并从他们的单位获得高绩效的人。这一发现能否解释当今美国组织所面临的一些绩效问题?会不会是那些成功的管理者,那些在政治上精明的管理者,被迅速提升到负责任的职位,可能不是有效的管理者,他们的下属满意、忠诚,在他们的单位里做出了数量和质量的业绩?本文探讨了迄今为止假设的“成功的管理者”和“有效的管理者”的等价性。与其寻找复杂的技术或政府方法来解决当今组织所面临的性能问题,解决方案可能很简单,只要提升高效的管理者并学习他们如何开展工作。也许是时候向真正的管理者自己寻求一些答案了。这些经理是谁?他们在各个层次和各种类型的组织中都有职位,如部门主管、总经理、商店经理、营销经理、办公室经理、代理主管或地区经理。换句话说,也许当今组织所面临的绩效问题的答案可以在他们自己的后院找到,在管理者自己的日常活动中找到。当前的管理工作观
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Successful vs. Effective Real Managers
W hat do successful managers those who have been promoted relatively quickly have in common with effective managers those who have satisfied, committed subordinates and high performing units? Surprisingly, the answer seems to be that they have little in common. Successful managers in what we define as "real organizations" large and small mainstream organizations, mostly in the mushrooming service industry in middle America are not engaged in the same day-to-day activities as effective managers in these organizations. This is probably the most important, and certainly the most intriguing, finding of a comprehensive four-year observational study of managerial work that is reported in a recent book by myself and two colleagues, titled Real Managers.1 The startling finding that there is a difference between successful and effective managers may merely confirm for many cynics and "passed over" managers something they have suspected for years. They believe that although managers who are successful (that is, rapidly promoted) may be astute politicians, they are not necessarily effective. Indeed, the so-called successful managers may be the ones who do not in fact take care of people and get high performance from their units. Could this finding explain some of the performance problems facing American organizations today? Could it be that the successful managers, the politically savvy ones who are being rapidly promoted into responsible positions, may not be the effective managers, the ones with satisfied, committed subordinates turning out quantity and quality performance in their units? This article explores the heretofore assumed equivalence of "successful managers" and "effective managers." Instead of looking for sophisticated technical or governmental approaches to the performance problems facing today's organizations, the solution may be as simple as promoting effective managers and learning how they carry out their jobs. Maybe it is time to turn to the real managers themselves for some answers. And who are these managers? They are found at all levels and in all types of organizations with titles such as department head, general manager, store manager, marketing manager, office manager, agency chief, or district manager. In other words, maybe the answers to the performance problems facing organizations today can be found in their own backyards, in the managers themselves in their day-today activities. The Current View of Managerial Work
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Closing the performance feedback gap with expert systems Cross-border transfer of knowledge: Cultural lessons from Project GLOBE Kaleidoscope careers: An alternate explanation for the “opt-out“ revolution The Role of Entrepreneurial Orientation in Stimulating Effective Corporate Entrepreneurship Executives Ask: How and why should firms and their employees set goals? Editor's introduction: Establishing organizational goals and rewards
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1