英语期刊文章的母语和非母语作者之间的说服性对冲策略

M. G. Aditama
{"title":"英语期刊文章的母语和非母语作者之间的说服性对冲策略","authors":"M. G. Aditama","doi":"10.22515/LJBS.V3I2.1408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Writing journal articles is the most scientific way to publish new research to public. Authors’ strategies to convince the readers are important to show their stance and viewpoint on the research. This study compares the strategies chosen by native and non-native English authors of journal articles in hedging their stances. The data were hedging strategies written in 50 randomly selected international journal articles, 25 of which were written by native English authors and 25 others by the non-natives. The result shows some differences in the use of hedges. Native authors show higher frequency in the use of writer-oriented hedges whereas non-native authors  had higher frequency in reader-oriented hedges. This study also finds authors’ styles to persuade the readers.","PeriodicalId":398772,"journal":{"name":"LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra","volume":"24 19","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERSUASIVE HEDGING STRATEGIES BETWEEN NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE AUTHORS OF ENGLISH JOURNAL ARTICLES\",\"authors\":\"M. G. Aditama\",\"doi\":\"10.22515/LJBS.V3I2.1408\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Writing journal articles is the most scientific way to publish new research to public. Authors’ strategies to convince the readers are important to show their stance and viewpoint on the research. This study compares the strategies chosen by native and non-native English authors of journal articles in hedging their stances. The data were hedging strategies written in 50 randomly selected international journal articles, 25 of which were written by native English authors and 25 others by the non-natives. The result shows some differences in the use of hedges. Native authors show higher frequency in the use of writer-oriented hedges whereas non-native authors  had higher frequency in reader-oriented hedges. This study also finds authors’ styles to persuade the readers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":398772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra\",\"volume\":\"24 19\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22515/LJBS.V3I2.1408\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEKSEMA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22515/LJBS.V3I2.1408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

撰写期刊文章是向公众发表新研究的最科学的方式。作者说服读者的策略对于表明他们对研究的立场和观点很重要。本研究比较了英语为母语和非英语为母语的期刊文章作者在回避立场时所选择的策略。这些数据是随机选择的50篇国际期刊文章中的对冲策略,其中25篇是由英语母语作者撰写的,另外25篇是由非英语母语作者撰写的。结果显示在模糊限制语的使用上存在一些差异。母语作者使用以作者为导向的模糊限制语的频率更高,而非母语作者使用以读者为导向的模糊限制语的频率更高。本研究还发现了作者说服读者的风格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PERSUASIVE HEDGING STRATEGIES BETWEEN NATIVE AND NON-NATIVE AUTHORS OF ENGLISH JOURNAL ARTICLES
Writing journal articles is the most scientific way to publish new research to public. Authors’ strategies to convince the readers are important to show their stance and viewpoint on the research. This study compares the strategies chosen by native and non-native English authors of journal articles in hedging their stances. The data were hedging strategies written in 50 randomly selected international journal articles, 25 of which were written by native English authors and 25 others by the non-natives. The result shows some differences in the use of hedges. Native authors show higher frequency in the use of writer-oriented hedges whereas non-native authors  had higher frequency in reader-oriented hedges. This study also finds authors’ styles to persuade the readers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CHARACTER DEPICTION WITH BEHAVIORAL PROCESS IN 'NOUVELLES VERTES' SHORT STORIES THE DIFFERENCES IN MEANING BETWEEN MUSLIM WOMEN'S MODEST CLOTHING AND WOMEN'S CLOTHING ADVERTORIALS STYLISTICS ANALYSES OF 'ONE ART', 'DO NOT GO GENTLE INTO THAT GOOD NIGHT', AND 'VILLANELLE OF SPRING BELLS' THE TYPES AND FUNCTIONS OF SWITCHING AND MIXING CODES IN ENGLISH STUDENTS’ ONLINE DISCUSSIONS CHALLENGING CULTURAL APPROPRIATION: PALESTINIAN CULTURAL IDENTITY IN RADHWĀ ‘ĀSYŪR’S NOVEL ATH-THANTHŪRIYYAH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1