批判法学视角下双性恋行为作为离婚依据的建构

Lilis Sulistianingsih
{"title":"批判法学视角下双性恋行为作为离婚依据的建构","authors":"Lilis Sulistianingsih","doi":"10.15642/alhukama.2023.13.1.50-75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bisexuality as an orientation deviation that places a person to be able to have sexual relations both against the opposite sex and the same sex, today has become a social problem as well as a legal issue that seems to be still not expressly regulated in the legislation. Especially if bisexual acts are committed in a legal marriage institution by a husband or wife, while in it there are no constant quarrels. This article discusses bisexual acts committed in marriage with two focuses of discussion, namely bisexual acts in legislation from the perspective of critical legal studies (CLS) and legal reformulation of future laws and regulations. Through the type of normative research with legal, philosophical, and conceptual approaches, this article argues that the normativity of bisexual acts in marriage from the CLS perspective is still a requirement for an individualist-liberal legal style. The article argues that a reformulation of some regulations in Indonesia is necessary. This article offers a reformulation with two things. First, adding the offense of same-sex adultery to Article 411 to Article 411A of the Criminal Code.  Second, amend and add authentic interpretations to the Explanation of Article 39 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 19 letter a of Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, and Article 116 letter a of the Compilation of Islamic Law.","PeriodicalId":245959,"journal":{"name":"AL-HUKAMA'","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Construction of Bisexual Act as A Ground for Divorce on Critical Legal Studies Perspective\",\"authors\":\"Lilis Sulistianingsih\",\"doi\":\"10.15642/alhukama.2023.13.1.50-75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bisexuality as an orientation deviation that places a person to be able to have sexual relations both against the opposite sex and the same sex, today has become a social problem as well as a legal issue that seems to be still not expressly regulated in the legislation. Especially if bisexual acts are committed in a legal marriage institution by a husband or wife, while in it there are no constant quarrels. This article discusses bisexual acts committed in marriage with two focuses of discussion, namely bisexual acts in legislation from the perspective of critical legal studies (CLS) and legal reformulation of future laws and regulations. Through the type of normative research with legal, philosophical, and conceptual approaches, this article argues that the normativity of bisexual acts in marriage from the CLS perspective is still a requirement for an individualist-liberal legal style. The article argues that a reformulation of some regulations in Indonesia is necessary. This article offers a reformulation with two things. First, adding the offense of same-sex adultery to Article 411 to Article 411A of the Criminal Code.  Second, amend and add authentic interpretations to the Explanation of Article 39 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 19 letter a of Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, and Article 116 letter a of the Compilation of Islamic Law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":245959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AL-HUKAMA'\",\"volume\":\"153 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AL-HUKAMA'\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2023.13.1.50-75\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AL-HUKAMA'","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2023.13.1.50-75","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

双性恋作为一种取向偏差,使一个人既可以与异性也可以与同性发生性关系,今天已经成为一个社会问题,也是一个法律问题,似乎仍然没有在立法中明确规定。特别是如果双性恋行为是由丈夫或妻子在合法的婚姻机构中进行的,而在其中没有持续的争吵。本文从两个方面探讨婚姻中的双性恋行为,即批判法学研究(CLS)视角下的立法中的双性恋行为和未来法律法规的法律重构。通过法律、哲学和概念的规范性研究,本文认为,从CLS的角度来看,婚姻中双性恋行为的规范性仍然是个人主义-自由主义法律风格的要求。文章认为,印尼有必要重新制定一些法规。本文从两个方面提供了一个重新表述。第一,将同性通奸罪增加到刑法第411条至第411A条。第二,对1974年关于婚姻的第1号法律第39条第(2)款、1975年关于执行1974年关于婚姻的第1号法律的第9号政府条例第19条第a款和《伊斯兰教法汇编》第116条第a款的解释进行修改和增加真实的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Construction of Bisexual Act as A Ground for Divorce on Critical Legal Studies Perspective
Bisexuality as an orientation deviation that places a person to be able to have sexual relations both against the opposite sex and the same sex, today has become a social problem as well as a legal issue that seems to be still not expressly regulated in the legislation. Especially if bisexual acts are committed in a legal marriage institution by a husband or wife, while in it there are no constant quarrels. This article discusses bisexual acts committed in marriage with two focuses of discussion, namely bisexual acts in legislation from the perspective of critical legal studies (CLS) and legal reformulation of future laws and regulations. Through the type of normative research with legal, philosophical, and conceptual approaches, this article argues that the normativity of bisexual acts in marriage from the CLS perspective is still a requirement for an individualist-liberal legal style. The article argues that a reformulation of some regulations in Indonesia is necessary. This article offers a reformulation with two things. First, adding the offense of same-sex adultery to Article 411 to Article 411A of the Criminal Code.  Second, amend and add authentic interpretations to the Explanation of Article 39 paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, Article 19 letter a of Government Regulation Number 9 of 1975 concerning the Implementation of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, and Article 116 letter a of the Compilation of Islamic Law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Early Marriage in Kaliboto Kidul on Maqasid Sharia Perspective Between Work and Family: Multiple Role Strategies of Career Women in Sultan Agung Islamic University Tracing the Equity on Islamic Heirs: The Reach of Inheritance of Substitute Heirs on the Compilation of Islamic Law For the Sake of Protecting Physcal Needs: Maqasid Sharia Perspective Toward Judges Consideration on Child Custody The Closure of Isbat For Polygamous Marriage on Legal Purpose Perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1