可再生能源高渗透率的储能

B. Cárdenas, L. Swinfen-Styles, J. Rouse, A. Hoskin, Weiqing Xu, S. Garvey
{"title":"可再生能源高渗透率的储能","authors":"B. Cárdenas, L. Swinfen-Styles, J. Rouse, A. Hoskin, Weiqing Xu, S. Garvey","doi":"10.1109/OSES.2019.8867359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores how the energy storage capacity required by an electric grid increases with the penetration of renewable generation. The paper uses the UK as a case study and aims to quantify the amount and duration of energy storage that the country will need to fully decarbonize its electric supply. The paper also studies the effect that the mix of renewables (wind + solar) has on the storage capacity needed and highlights that a greater mismatch between the generation and demand profiles will require a larger energy storage capacity. Therefore the right generation mix for the region should be used. Results show that the UK will need a storage capacity of approximately 7.63 TWh (~4 days) to achieve an overall renewable penetration of 100%. Two important considerations are made: i) the mix between wind and solar is 79–21% and ii) a 5% of over-generation (and curtailment) is allowed. Assuming that the storage capacity is provided by compressed air systems (CAES) and considering the current costs of renewable generation, this scenario attains a levelized cost of electricity of ~61 £/MWh. This scenario achieves the lowest possible LCOE despite the fact that 5% of the generated electricity is wasted and still paid-for. If a strict rule of zero-net curtailment was in place, the storage capacity required would almost double (14.93 TWh) and the final cost of electricity would be ~2.3% higher.","PeriodicalId":416860,"journal":{"name":"2019 Offshore Energy and Storage Summit (OSES)","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy Storage for a High Penetration of Renewables\",\"authors\":\"B. Cárdenas, L. Swinfen-Styles, J. Rouse, A. Hoskin, Weiqing Xu, S. Garvey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/OSES.2019.8867359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores how the energy storage capacity required by an electric grid increases with the penetration of renewable generation. The paper uses the UK as a case study and aims to quantify the amount and duration of energy storage that the country will need to fully decarbonize its electric supply. The paper also studies the effect that the mix of renewables (wind + solar) has on the storage capacity needed and highlights that a greater mismatch between the generation and demand profiles will require a larger energy storage capacity. Therefore the right generation mix for the region should be used. Results show that the UK will need a storage capacity of approximately 7.63 TWh (~4 days) to achieve an overall renewable penetration of 100%. Two important considerations are made: i) the mix between wind and solar is 79–21% and ii) a 5% of over-generation (and curtailment) is allowed. Assuming that the storage capacity is provided by compressed air systems (CAES) and considering the current costs of renewable generation, this scenario attains a levelized cost of electricity of ~61 £/MWh. This scenario achieves the lowest possible LCOE despite the fact that 5% of the generated electricity is wasted and still paid-for. If a strict rule of zero-net curtailment was in place, the storage capacity required would almost double (14.93 TWh) and the final cost of electricity would be ~2.3% higher.\",\"PeriodicalId\":416860,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 Offshore Energy and Storage Summit (OSES)\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 Offshore Energy and Storage Summit (OSES)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/OSES.2019.8867359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 Offshore Energy and Storage Summit (OSES)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OSES.2019.8867359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

本文探讨了电网所需的储能容量如何随着可再生能源发电的普及而增加。这篇论文以英国为例,旨在量化该国实现电力供应完全脱碳所需的储能数量和持续时间。该报告还研究了可再生能源(风能+太阳能)组合对所需储能容量的影响,并强调了发电和需求之间更大的不匹配将需要更大的储能容量。因此,应该使用适合该地区的发电组合。结果表明,英国将需要大约7.63太瓦时(约4天)的存储容量来实现100%的可再生能源渗透率。有两个重要的考虑:1)风能和太阳能的混合比例是79-21%;2)允许5%的过度发电(和弃电)。假设存储容量由压缩空气系统(CAES)提供,并考虑到当前可再生能源发电的成本,这种情况下的平均电力成本为~61英镑/兆瓦时。这种方案实现了最低的LCOE,尽管5%的发电被浪费了,但仍然需要支付费用。如果实施严格的零净限电规则,所需的存储容量将几乎翻倍(14.93太瓦时),最终的电力成本将高出约2.3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Energy Storage for a High Penetration of Renewables
This paper explores how the energy storage capacity required by an electric grid increases with the penetration of renewable generation. The paper uses the UK as a case study and aims to quantify the amount and duration of energy storage that the country will need to fully decarbonize its electric supply. The paper also studies the effect that the mix of renewables (wind + solar) has on the storage capacity needed and highlights that a greater mismatch between the generation and demand profiles will require a larger energy storage capacity. Therefore the right generation mix for the region should be used. Results show that the UK will need a storage capacity of approximately 7.63 TWh (~4 days) to achieve an overall renewable penetration of 100%. Two important considerations are made: i) the mix between wind and solar is 79–21% and ii) a 5% of over-generation (and curtailment) is allowed. Assuming that the storage capacity is provided by compressed air systems (CAES) and considering the current costs of renewable generation, this scenario attains a levelized cost of electricity of ~61 £/MWh. This scenario achieves the lowest possible LCOE despite the fact that 5% of the generated electricity is wasted and still paid-for. If a strict rule of zero-net curtailment was in place, the storage capacity required would almost double (14.93 TWh) and the final cost of electricity would be ~2.3% higher.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Evaluating the regional potential for emissions reduction using energy storage A comparative study of the Adiabatic Compressed Air Energy Storage (A-CAES) and Pumped Thermal Energy Storage (PTES) systems Modelling the effects of low-cost large-scale energy storage in the UK electricity network Present Status and Challenges for the Interaction between Offshore Wind Farms and Maritime Navigation in the Taiwan Strait Modeling of Multiterminal HVDC Offshore Grids with Renewable Energy and Storage Integration by Opensource Tools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1