{"title":"经皮内窥镜胃造口术在二级州立医院进行","authors":"K. Yetis Gülsoy, Ferit Yeşil","doi":"10.48176/esmj.2023.96","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the indications\nof Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) patients treated in a\nsecondary state Burdur hospital over a period of three years, the unit\nwhere the patient was hospitalized, survival time with PEG therapy,\nand the complications observed in these patients.\nMethods: Patients who underwent PEG in the endoscopy unit\nof our hospital, between January 2019 and January 2022, were\nretrospectively evaluated. Age, gender, the unit of inpatient, indications\nfor PEG therapy, complications after PEG, and survival status of the\npatients were recorded in the form of case reports. Patients with\ncoagulation disorders, hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, sepsis,\ninfection at the insertion area, peritonitis carcinomatosis, a history of\ntotal gastrectomy and gastric varices were excluded.\nResults:The median age of the 120 patients included in the study\nwas 79 (17–100) years, and 66 (55%) of the patients were male.\nComplications were observed in 14 (11.7%) patients, all of which\nwere minor, including seven (5.8%) PEG site infections, three (2.5%)\nPEG site leakages, three (2.5%) PEG occlusions, and one (0.9%)\nPEG removal. It was determined that 73 (60.8%) patients survived\nat least 30 days; the patients were most frequently referred by the\nneurology unit, with a rate of 52.7%. The most common indications for\nPEG insertion were cerebrovascular disease (56.7%) and dementia\n(29.2%).\nConclusion: Maintenance of nutritional requirements via PEG allows\nfor the preservation of mucosal integrity and barrier function, intestinal\nimmune response, and normal flora. It is superior to other enteral\nfeeding methods due to the lower risk of aspiration. In conclusion,\nour study, which presented the experiences of the PEG insertion and\ntherapy in a secondary state hospital, stated that the complication\nrates, indications, and referring clinics were found to be consistent\nwith available literature.","PeriodicalId":348820,"journal":{"name":"Eskisehir Medical Journal, Eskisehir City Hospital","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY RESULTS IN A SECONDARY STATE HOSPITAL\",\"authors\":\"K. Yetis Gülsoy, Ferit Yeşil\",\"doi\":\"10.48176/esmj.2023.96\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the indications\\nof Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) patients treated in a\\nsecondary state Burdur hospital over a period of three years, the unit\\nwhere the patient was hospitalized, survival time with PEG therapy,\\nand the complications observed in these patients.\\nMethods: Patients who underwent PEG in the endoscopy unit\\nof our hospital, between January 2019 and January 2022, were\\nretrospectively evaluated. Age, gender, the unit of inpatient, indications\\nfor PEG therapy, complications after PEG, and survival status of the\\npatients were recorded in the form of case reports. Patients with\\ncoagulation disorders, hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, sepsis,\\ninfection at the insertion area, peritonitis carcinomatosis, a history of\\ntotal gastrectomy and gastric varices were excluded.\\nResults:The median age of the 120 patients included in the study\\nwas 79 (17–100) years, and 66 (55%) of the patients were male.\\nComplications were observed in 14 (11.7%) patients, all of which\\nwere minor, including seven (5.8%) PEG site infections, three (2.5%)\\nPEG site leakages, three (2.5%) PEG occlusions, and one (0.9%)\\nPEG removal. It was determined that 73 (60.8%) patients survived\\nat least 30 days; the patients were most frequently referred by the\\nneurology unit, with a rate of 52.7%. The most common indications for\\nPEG insertion were cerebrovascular disease (56.7%) and dementia\\n(29.2%).\\nConclusion: Maintenance of nutritional requirements via PEG allows\\nfor the preservation of mucosal integrity and barrier function, intestinal\\nimmune response, and normal flora. It is superior to other enteral\\nfeeding methods due to the lower risk of aspiration. In conclusion,\\nour study, which presented the experiences of the PEG insertion and\\ntherapy in a secondary state hospital, stated that the complication\\nrates, indications, and referring clinics were found to be consistent\\nwith available literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":348820,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eskisehir Medical Journal, Eskisehir City Hospital\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eskisehir Medical Journal, Eskisehir City Hospital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.48176/esmj.2023.96\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eskisehir Medical Journal, Eskisehir City Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48176/esmj.2023.96","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
PERCUTANEOUS ENDOSCOPIC GASTROSTOMY RESULTS IN A SECONDARY STATE HOSPITAL
Introduction: The aim of this study was to determine the indications
of Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) patients treated in a
secondary state Burdur hospital over a period of three years, the unit
where the patient was hospitalized, survival time with PEG therapy,
and the complications observed in these patients.
Methods: Patients who underwent PEG in the endoscopy unit
of our hospital, between January 2019 and January 2022, were
retrospectively evaluated. Age, gender, the unit of inpatient, indications
for PEG therapy, complications after PEG, and survival status of the
patients were recorded in the form of case reports. Patients with
coagulation disorders, hemodynamic instability, peritonitis, sepsis,
infection at the insertion area, peritonitis carcinomatosis, a history of
total gastrectomy and gastric varices were excluded.
Results:The median age of the 120 patients included in the study
was 79 (17–100) years, and 66 (55%) of the patients were male.
Complications were observed in 14 (11.7%) patients, all of which
were minor, including seven (5.8%) PEG site infections, three (2.5%)
PEG site leakages, three (2.5%) PEG occlusions, and one (0.9%)
PEG removal. It was determined that 73 (60.8%) patients survived
at least 30 days; the patients were most frequently referred by the
neurology unit, with a rate of 52.7%. The most common indications for
PEG insertion were cerebrovascular disease (56.7%) and dementia
(29.2%).
Conclusion: Maintenance of nutritional requirements via PEG allows
for the preservation of mucosal integrity and barrier function, intestinal
immune response, and normal flora. It is superior to other enteral
feeding methods due to the lower risk of aspiration. In conclusion,
our study, which presented the experiences of the PEG insertion and
therapy in a secondary state hospital, stated that the complication
rates, indications, and referring clinics were found to be consistent
with available literature.