如果多代理价格代表产品质量,谁将从平台进入中受益?

Ye Qiu, R. Rao
{"title":"如果多代理价格代表产品质量,谁将从平台进入中受益?","authors":"Ye Qiu, R. Rao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3879836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Merchants are wary of a platform entering as a competitor and adversely affecting sales and margins. A platform wanting to maximize profits is interested also in gaining consumer trust and confidence by providing credible quality information to consumers. As a practical matter, could a platform benefit by entering, by using multi-sender prices as signals to alleviate consumers’ uncertainty of quality? Further, can a merchant also benefit from platform entry? We answer these questions by analyzing strategic pricing by a platform and merchant under quality uncertainty. We innovate by modeling platform-merchant competition in a leader-follower framework and characterizing the sub-game perfect pricing strategy that is also PBE with consumers resolving quality uncertainty using both platform and merchant prices. We find that platform entry and resulting multi-agent signaling can help to inform consumers of quality. Consumers can benefit by lower prices and increased market coverage. An important result is that conditions exist for an equilibrium outcome identical to complete information. Even more interesting, the platform, merchant and consumers could all be made better off by platform entry.","PeriodicalId":232169,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Benefits from Platform Entry if Multi-Agent Prices Signal Product Quality?\",\"authors\":\"Ye Qiu, R. Rao\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3879836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Merchants are wary of a platform entering as a competitor and adversely affecting sales and margins. A platform wanting to maximize profits is interested also in gaining consumer trust and confidence by providing credible quality information to consumers. As a practical matter, could a platform benefit by entering, by using multi-sender prices as signals to alleviate consumers’ uncertainty of quality? Further, can a merchant also benefit from platform entry? We answer these questions by analyzing strategic pricing by a platform and merchant under quality uncertainty. We innovate by modeling platform-merchant competition in a leader-follower framework and characterizing the sub-game perfect pricing strategy that is also PBE with consumers resolving quality uncertainty using both platform and merchant prices. We find that platform entry and resulting multi-agent signaling can help to inform consumers of quality. Consumers can benefit by lower prices and increased market coverage. An important result is that conditions exist for an equilibrium outcome identical to complete information. Even more interesting, the platform, merchant and consumers could all be made better off by platform entry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":232169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3879836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Microeconomics: Asymmetric & Private Information (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3879836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

商家对作为竞争对手进入的平台持谨慎态度,担心这会对销售和利润率产生不利影响。一个想要实现利润最大化的平台也有兴趣通过向消费者提供可靠的高质量信息来获得消费者的信任和信心。作为一个实际问题,一个平台是否可以通过使用多发送方价格作为信号来减轻消费者对质量的不确定性而受益?此外,商家是否也能从平台进入中获益?我们通过分析平台和商家在质量不确定性下的战略定价来回答这些问题。我们通过在领导者-追随者框架中对平台-商家竞争进行建模,并描述子游戏完美定价策略,这也是消费者使用平台和商家价格解决质量不确定性的PBE。我们发现,平台进入和由此产生的多代理信号可以帮助告知消费者质量。消费者可以从更低的价格和更大的市场覆盖面中受益。一个重要的结果是存在与完全信息相同的均衡结果的条件。更有趣的是,平台、商家和消费者都可以通过平台进入而获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Benefits from Platform Entry if Multi-Agent Prices Signal Product Quality?
Merchants are wary of a platform entering as a competitor and adversely affecting sales and margins. A platform wanting to maximize profits is interested also in gaining consumer trust and confidence by providing credible quality information to consumers. As a practical matter, could a platform benefit by entering, by using multi-sender prices as signals to alleviate consumers’ uncertainty of quality? Further, can a merchant also benefit from platform entry? We answer these questions by analyzing strategic pricing by a platform and merchant under quality uncertainty. We innovate by modeling platform-merchant competition in a leader-follower framework and characterizing the sub-game perfect pricing strategy that is also PBE with consumers resolving quality uncertainty using both platform and merchant prices. We find that platform entry and resulting multi-agent signaling can help to inform consumers of quality. Consumers can benefit by lower prices and increased market coverage. An important result is that conditions exist for an equilibrium outcome identical to complete information. Even more interesting, the platform, merchant and consumers could all be made better off by platform entry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Social Value of Public Information When Not Everyone is Privately Informed Hype Cycles: Dynamic Information Design with Two Audiences A Mechanism and Matching in a Social Dilemma The quasi-sorting equilibrium and incentive effects in parallel contests with multiple types of players Competition and Selection in Credit Markets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1