第13章:治理机制

Murray J. Bryant, Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, M. Mixa
{"title":"第13章:治理机制","authors":"Murray J. Bryant, Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, M. Mixa","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract \nThis chapter examines the formal governance mechanisms put in place by various authorities within Iceland after the crash. In contrast to one of our earlier papers (Bryant, Sigurjonsson, & Mixa, 2014), we find that, no matter how well the mechanisms work, formal mechanisms are insufficient to restore trust. To that end, we examine the trust literature from political science that suggests that trust is a lubricant of the social system that consequently causes individuals to open themselves up to vulnerability. When trust is broken in a society with a high-existing degree of trust, such as Iceland, the loss of trust is significant and leads even apparently minor incidents to be perceived as betrayals. We examine the various processes put in place by both the government and other institutions and show how they mostly worked in concert. Nonetheless, we find that the processes by themselves have been insufficient to restore society’s trust in the affected institutions.","PeriodicalId":145304,"journal":{"name":"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis","volume":"216 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chapter 13: Governance Mechanisms Post\",\"authors\":\"Murray J. Bryant, Throstur Olaf Sigurjonsson, M. Mixa\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract \\nThis chapter examines the formal governance mechanisms put in place by various authorities within Iceland after the crash. In contrast to one of our earlier papers (Bryant, Sigurjonsson, & Mixa, 2014), we find that, no matter how well the mechanisms work, formal mechanisms are insufficient to restore trust. To that end, we examine the trust literature from political science that suggests that trust is a lubricant of the social system that consequently causes individuals to open themselves up to vulnerability. When trust is broken in a society with a high-existing degree of trust, such as Iceland, the loss of trust is significant and leads even apparently minor incidents to be perceived as betrayals. We examine the various processes put in place by both the government and other institutions and show how they mostly worked in concert. Nonetheless, we find that the processes by themselves have been insufficient to restore society’s trust in the affected institutions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":145304,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis\",\"volume\":\"216 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181018\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Return of Trust? Institutions and the Public after the Icelandic Financial Crisis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78743-347-220181018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章考察了危机后冰岛各当局实施的正式治理机制。与我们之前的一篇论文(Bryant, Sigurjonsson, & Mixa, 2014)相反,我们发现,无论机制运作得多么好,形式机制都不足以恢复信任。为此,我们研究了来自政治学的信任文献,这些文献表明信任是社会系统的润滑剂,因此导致个人对脆弱性敞开心扉。当信任在一个信任程度很高的社会中被打破时,比如冰岛,信任的丧失是重大的,甚至会导致看似微不足道的事件被视为背叛。我们研究了政府和其他机构实施的各种流程,并展示了它们是如何协同工作的。然而,我们发现这些过程本身不足以恢复社会对受影响机构的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chapter 13: Governance Mechanisms Post
Abstract This chapter examines the formal governance mechanisms put in place by various authorities within Iceland after the crash. In contrast to one of our earlier papers (Bryant, Sigurjonsson, & Mixa, 2014), we find that, no matter how well the mechanisms work, formal mechanisms are insufficient to restore trust. To that end, we examine the trust literature from political science that suggests that trust is a lubricant of the social system that consequently causes individuals to open themselves up to vulnerability. When trust is broken in a society with a high-existing degree of trust, such as Iceland, the loss of trust is significant and leads even apparently minor incidents to be perceived as betrayals. We examine the various processes put in place by both the government and other institutions and show how they mostly worked in concert. Nonetheless, we find that the processes by themselves have been insufficient to restore society’s trust in the affected institutions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Chapter 11: Post-Crisis Regulation and Supervision of Icelandic Banks Chapter 5: ‘Not Just Crying About the Money’: Iceland and Globalisation During Boom and Crisis Chapter 10: Trust and Financial Services: The Impact of Increasing Digitalisation and the Financial Crisis Chapter 4: Trust: Some Questions from a Layperson Chapter 12: Restoring Trust Through Improved Corporate Governance and Adherence to Gender Quotas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1