COD模型:模拟工作组绩效

L. Biggiero, E. Sevi
{"title":"COD模型:模拟工作组绩效","authors":"L. Biggiero, E. Sevi","doi":"10.1142/9789812793478_0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Though the question of the determinants of workgroup performance is one of the most central in organization science, precise theoretical frameworks and formal demonstrations are still missing. In order to fill in this gap the COD agent-based simulation model is here presented and used to study the effects of task interdependence and bounded rationality on workgroup performance. The first relevant finding is an algorithmic demonstration of the ordering of interdependencies in terms of complexity, showing that the parallel mode is the most simplex, followed by the sequential and then by the reciprocal. This result is far from being new in organization science, but what is remarkable is that now it has the strength of an algorithmic demonstration instead of being based on the authoritativeness of some scholar or on some episodic empirical finding. The second important result is that the progressive introduction of realistic limits to agents’ rationality dramatically reduces workgroup performance and addresses to a rather interesting result: when agents’ rationality is severely bounded simple norms work better than complex norms. The third main finding is that when the complexity of interdependence is high, then the appropriate coordination mechanism is agents’ direct and active collaboration, which means teamwork.","PeriodicalId":164119,"journal":{"name":"ORG: Groups & Teams (Topic)","volume":"180 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The COD Model: Simulating Workgroup Performance\",\"authors\":\"L. Biggiero, E. Sevi\",\"doi\":\"10.1142/9789812793478_0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Though the question of the determinants of workgroup performance is one of the most central in organization science, precise theoretical frameworks and formal demonstrations are still missing. In order to fill in this gap the COD agent-based simulation model is here presented and used to study the effects of task interdependence and bounded rationality on workgroup performance. The first relevant finding is an algorithmic demonstration of the ordering of interdependencies in terms of complexity, showing that the parallel mode is the most simplex, followed by the sequential and then by the reciprocal. This result is far from being new in organization science, but what is remarkable is that now it has the strength of an algorithmic demonstration instead of being based on the authoritativeness of some scholar or on some episodic empirical finding. The second important result is that the progressive introduction of realistic limits to agents’ rationality dramatically reduces workgroup performance and addresses to a rather interesting result: when agents’ rationality is severely bounded simple norms work better than complex norms. The third main finding is that when the complexity of interdependence is high, then the appropriate coordination mechanism is agents’ direct and active collaboration, which means teamwork.\",\"PeriodicalId\":164119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ORG: Groups & Teams (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"180 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ORG: Groups & Teams (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812793478_0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ORG: Groups & Teams (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/9789812793478_0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然工作组绩效的决定因素问题是组织科学中最核心的问题之一,但精确的理论框架和正式的证明仍然缺乏。为了填补这一空白,本文提出了基于智能体的COD仿真模型,并利用该模型研究了任务相互依赖和有限理性对工作组绩效的影响。第一个相关的发现是对相互依赖关系的复杂性排序的算法演示,表明并行模式是最简单的,其次是顺序模式,然后是倒数模式。这一结果在组织科学中远非新鲜事物,但值得注意的是,现在它具有了算法论证的力量,而不是基于某些学者的权威或某些偶然的实证发现。第二个重要的结果是,对智能体理性的现实限制的逐步引入极大地降低了工作组的绩效,并提出了一个相当有趣的结果:当智能体的理性受到严格限制时,简单规范比复杂规范更有效。第三个主要发现是,当相互依赖的复杂性较高时,合适的协调机制是代理人的直接和主动协作,即团队合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The COD Model: Simulating Workgroup Performance
Though the question of the determinants of workgroup performance is one of the most central in organization science, precise theoretical frameworks and formal demonstrations are still missing. In order to fill in this gap the COD agent-based simulation model is here presented and used to study the effects of task interdependence and bounded rationality on workgroup performance. The first relevant finding is an algorithmic demonstration of the ordering of interdependencies in terms of complexity, showing that the parallel mode is the most simplex, followed by the sequential and then by the reciprocal. This result is far from being new in organization science, but what is remarkable is that now it has the strength of an algorithmic demonstration instead of being based on the authoritativeness of some scholar or on some episodic empirical finding. The second important result is that the progressive introduction of realistic limits to agents’ rationality dramatically reduces workgroup performance and addresses to a rather interesting result: when agents’ rationality is severely bounded simple norms work better than complex norms. The third main finding is that when the complexity of interdependence is high, then the appropriate coordination mechanism is agents’ direct and active collaboration, which means teamwork.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Team Conflict: The 'Chatty' Accusation at the Customer Support Call Center Accountability One Step Removed Friends Asking Friends for Charity: The Importance of Gifts and Audience The Relationship between Team Identification and Organisational Identification: The Case of the Australian Rugby Union Team Incentives and Reference-Dependent Preferences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1