桥接RTL和gate:将设计调试的不同抽象级别关联起来

Eric Cheung, X. Chen, F. Tsai, Y. Hsu, H. Hsieh
{"title":"桥接RTL和gate:将设计调试的不同抽象级别关联起来","authors":"Eric Cheung, X. Chen, F. Tsai, Y. Hsu, H. Hsieh","doi":"10.1109/HLDVT.2007.4392790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to help designers debug and verify a Gate-Level design that is generated from a Register-Transfer-Level (RTL) reference model, it is important to bridge the knowledge gap between the two levels of abstraction. In this paper, we present a comprehensive approach to establish correspondence of design objects between a Gate-Level implementation and its golden reference model specified at RTL. We consider both common logic synthesis transformations and advanced logic optimizations that are applied in the generation of the Gate-Level implementation, while not being restricted to any specific synthesis tool. Our approach integrates a set of techniques to compare the similarities in names, structures, and functions between the Gate-Level implementation and the RTL counterpart We use large industrial designs to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and show how our design correlation tool can help designers solve their problems such as Engineering Change Order, Timing Closure, and Emulation Visualization.","PeriodicalId":339324,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging RTL and gate: correlating different levels of abstraction for design debugging\",\"authors\":\"Eric Cheung, X. Chen, F. Tsai, Y. Hsu, H. Hsieh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/HLDVT.2007.4392790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to help designers debug and verify a Gate-Level design that is generated from a Register-Transfer-Level (RTL) reference model, it is important to bridge the knowledge gap between the two levels of abstraction. In this paper, we present a comprehensive approach to establish correspondence of design objects between a Gate-Level implementation and its golden reference model specified at RTL. We consider both common logic synthesis transformations and advanced logic optimizations that are applied in the generation of the Gate-Level implementation, while not being restricted to any specific synthesis tool. Our approach integrates a set of techniques to compare the similarities in names, structures, and functions between the Gate-Level implementation and the RTL counterpart We use large industrial designs to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and show how our design correlation tool can help designers solve their problems such as Engineering Change Order, Timing Closure, and Emulation Visualization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":339324,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2007.4392790\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International High Level Design Validation and Test Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HLDVT.2007.4392790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

为了帮助设计人员调试和验证由寄存器-传输级(RTL)参考模型生成的门级设计,有必要弥合两个抽象级别之间的知识鸿沟。在本文中,我们提出了一种全面的方法来建立门级实现与RTL指定的黄金参考模型之间的设计对象的对应关系。我们考虑了在门级实现的生成中应用的通用逻辑综合转换和高级逻辑优化,而不限于任何特定的综合工具。我们的方法集成了一组技术来比较门级实现和RTL对应物在名称、结构和功能上的相似性。我们使用大型工业设计来展示我们方法的有效性,并展示我们的设计相关工具如何帮助设计师解决他们的问题,如工程变更顺序、时序关闭和仿真可视化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bridging RTL and gate: correlating different levels of abstraction for design debugging
In order to help designers debug and verify a Gate-Level design that is generated from a Register-Transfer-Level (RTL) reference model, it is important to bridge the knowledge gap between the two levels of abstraction. In this paper, we present a comprehensive approach to establish correspondence of design objects between a Gate-Level implementation and its golden reference model specified at RTL. We consider both common logic synthesis transformations and advanced logic optimizations that are applied in the generation of the Gate-Level implementation, while not being restricted to any specific synthesis tool. Our approach integrates a set of techniques to compare the similarities in names, structures, and functions between the Gate-Level implementation and the RTL counterpart We use large industrial designs to demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach and show how our design correlation tool can help designers solve their problems such as Engineering Change Order, Timing Closure, and Emulation Visualization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reliable network-on-chip based on generalized de Bruijn graph Automatic error diagnosis and correction for RTL designs A novel formal approach to generate high-level test vectors without ILP and SAT solvers Hierarchical cache coherence protocol verification one level at a time through assume guarantee Towards RTL test generation from SystemC TLM specifications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1