政府刺激计划真的那么有害吗?底层信息结构分析

Pascal Terveer
{"title":"政府刺激计划真的那么有害吗?底层信息结构分析","authors":"Pascal Terveer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2341167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The following paper analyzes the consequences of a government intervention in an economic environment where the households are unable to observe all economic shocks of interest. As it was recently presented in the literature, a government intervention that is designed to stabilize such an economy may actually be harmful. This effect is rooted in the households’ information set. Whenever the households are able to observe the government’s behavior, they may get additional information about the state of the economy and revise their decisions. This in turn, may lead to a more awkward equilibrium and thereby hurt the economy. However, this effect has, by now, only been highlighted in an economy without capital and a tight connection to the empirical literature. To fill this gap, we employ a New Keynesian model and allow for heterogeneous expectations. Our results suggest that a closer consideration of the empirical observations changes the results substantially. In particular, it is advisable to model the households’ heterogeneity more carefully, since it appears to be a major driver of recent results.","PeriodicalId":130325,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Household (Topic)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Government Stimulus Packages Really that Harmful? An Analysis of the Underlying Information Structure\",\"authors\":\"Pascal Terveer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2341167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The following paper analyzes the consequences of a government intervention in an economic environment where the households are unable to observe all economic shocks of interest. As it was recently presented in the literature, a government intervention that is designed to stabilize such an economy may actually be harmful. This effect is rooted in the households’ information set. Whenever the households are able to observe the government’s behavior, they may get additional information about the state of the economy and revise their decisions. This in turn, may lead to a more awkward equilibrium and thereby hurt the economy. However, this effect has, by now, only been highlighted in an economy without capital and a tight connection to the empirical literature. To fill this gap, we employ a New Keynesian model and allow for heterogeneous expectations. Our results suggest that a closer consideration of the empirical observations changes the results substantially. In particular, it is advisable to model the households’ heterogeneity more carefully, since it appears to be a major driver of recent results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Household (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Household (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2341167\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Household (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2341167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

下面的论文分析了在家庭无法观察到所有利益经济冲击的经济环境中政府干预的后果。正如最近在文献中提出的那样,旨在稳定这种经济的政府干预实际上可能是有害的。这种效应的根源在于家庭的信息集。只要家庭能够观察到政府的行为,他们就可以获得有关经济状况的额外信息,从而修改他们的决定。反过来,这可能会导致更尴尬的平衡,从而损害经济。然而,到目前为止,这种影响只在一个没有资本的经济体中得到强调,并且与实证文献密切相关。为了填补这一空白,我们采用了新凯恩斯主义模型,并允许异质预期。我们的结果表明,更仔细地考虑经验观察结果会大大改变结果。特别是,建议更仔细地模拟家庭的异质性,因为它似乎是最近结果的主要驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Government Stimulus Packages Really that Harmful? An Analysis of the Underlying Information Structure
The following paper analyzes the consequences of a government intervention in an economic environment where the households are unable to observe all economic shocks of interest. As it was recently presented in the literature, a government intervention that is designed to stabilize such an economy may actually be harmful. This effect is rooted in the households’ information set. Whenever the households are able to observe the government’s behavior, they may get additional information about the state of the economy and revise their decisions. This in turn, may lead to a more awkward equilibrium and thereby hurt the economy. However, this effect has, by now, only been highlighted in an economy without capital and a tight connection to the empirical literature. To fill this gap, we employ a New Keynesian model and allow for heterogeneous expectations. Our results suggest that a closer consideration of the empirical observations changes the results substantially. In particular, it is advisable to model the households’ heterogeneity more carefully, since it appears to be a major driver of recent results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Financial Restitution Gap in Consumer Finance: Insights from Complaints Filed with the CFPB Does Additional Mandatory Reporting Alter Charity or Donor Behavior? Examining the 2006 Pension Protection Act Entitled to Leave: The impact of Unemployment Insurance Eligibility on Employment Duration and Job Quality Economic Incentives Surrounding Fertility: Evidence from Alaska's Permanent Fund Dividend The Equilibrium and Spillover Effects of Early Retirement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1