11. 早期基督教石棺中的形象与修辞:对耶稣受审的反思

J. Elsner
{"title":"11. 早期基督教石棺中的形象与修辞:对耶稣受审的反思","authors":"J. Elsner","doi":"10.1515/9783110216783.359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Roman art is strikingly rhetorical. In particular, sarcophagi – with their highly distinctive and restricted spatial field for visual representation and the relatively narrow range of formal devices employed to decorate them – are strongly so. By formal devices I mean the repertoire of compositional elements that make up sarcophagi, the repetition of iconographic types (whose differences and specific identities may depend on no more than a single attribute being present or absent, or the juxtaposition with another scene) and the particular (relatively restricted) range of treatments of the carved surface. The relatively limited range of formal elements, combined with a marked creativity and variation in their deployment, creates what is simultaneously an interrelated corpus of copious material (both pagan and Christian) and one in which many figurative images allude (at different levels) to narratives that may range from myth and oral tradition to scriptural texts. But each item claims rhetorical specificity and difference from the others through its employment (including its position, thematic juxtaposition, formal and technical treatment) by contrast with other standard elements. Since the era of Roman sarcophagi (at its heyday between roughly 100 and 400) coincides so closely with what is called the Second Sophistic, the great","PeriodicalId":340893,"journal":{"name":"Life, Death and Representation","volume":"2014 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"11. Image and Rhetoric in Early Christian Sarcophagi: Reflections on Jesus’ Trial\",\"authors\":\"J. Elsner\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/9783110216783.359\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Roman art is strikingly rhetorical. In particular, sarcophagi – with their highly distinctive and restricted spatial field for visual representation and the relatively narrow range of formal devices employed to decorate them – are strongly so. By formal devices I mean the repertoire of compositional elements that make up sarcophagi, the repetition of iconographic types (whose differences and specific identities may depend on no more than a single attribute being present or absent, or the juxtaposition with another scene) and the particular (relatively restricted) range of treatments of the carved surface. The relatively limited range of formal elements, combined with a marked creativity and variation in their deployment, creates what is simultaneously an interrelated corpus of copious material (both pagan and Christian) and one in which many figurative images allude (at different levels) to narratives that may range from myth and oral tradition to scriptural texts. But each item claims rhetorical specificity and difference from the others through its employment (including its position, thematic juxtaposition, formal and technical treatment) by contrast with other standard elements. Since the era of Roman sarcophagi (at its heyday between roughly 100 and 400) coincides so closely with what is called the Second Sophistic, the great\",\"PeriodicalId\":340893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Life, Death and Representation\",\"volume\":\"2014 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Life, Death and Representation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216783.359\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life, Death and Representation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110216783.359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

罗马艺术是惊人的修辞。尤其是石棺,由于其高度独特和有限的视觉表现空间,以及用于装饰它们的正式设备的相对狭窄的范围,这是强烈的。我所说的形式装置是指构成石棺的所有组成元素,图像类型的重复(其差异和特定身份可能取决于不超过一个属性的存在或缺失,或与另一个场景的并置)以及雕刻表面的特定(相对有限的)处理范围。形式元素的相对有限的范围,结合其显著的创造力和变化的运用,创造了一个同时相互关联的丰富材料的语料库(包括异教和基督教),其中许多比喻形象(在不同层次上)暗示了从神话和口头传统到圣经文本的叙述。但是,通过与其他标准元素的对比,每个项目通过其使用(包括其位置,主题并置,形式和技术处理)声称其修辞特殊性和与其他项目的差异。由于罗马石棺时代(大约在公元100年到公元400年之间的鼎盛时期)与所谓的第二次诡辩时期非常接近
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
11. Image and Rhetoric in Early Christian Sarcophagi: Reflections on Jesus’ Trial
Roman art is strikingly rhetorical. In particular, sarcophagi – with their highly distinctive and restricted spatial field for visual representation and the relatively narrow range of formal devices employed to decorate them – are strongly so. By formal devices I mean the repertoire of compositional elements that make up sarcophagi, the repetition of iconographic types (whose differences and specific identities may depend on no more than a single attribute being present or absent, or the juxtaposition with another scene) and the particular (relatively restricted) range of treatments of the carved surface. The relatively limited range of formal elements, combined with a marked creativity and variation in their deployment, creates what is simultaneously an interrelated corpus of copious material (both pagan and Christian) and one in which many figurative images allude (at different levels) to narratives that may range from myth and oral tradition to scriptural texts. But each item claims rhetorical specificity and difference from the others through its employment (including its position, thematic juxtaposition, formal and technical treatment) by contrast with other standard elements. Since the era of Roman sarcophagi (at its heyday between roughly 100 and 400) coincides so closely with what is called the Second Sophistic, the great
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
6. In the Guise of Gods and Heroes: Portrait Heads on Roman Mythological Sarcophagi 3. Tragedy’s Forgotten Beauty: the Medieval Return of Orestes 4. The Roman Sarcophagus ‘Industry’: a Reconsideration 2. Habent sua fata: Writing life histories of Roman Sarcophagi 1. Before Sarcophagi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1