自我报告工具中极端反应风格的控制方法综述

A. Costa, N. H. Filho
{"title":"自我报告工具中极端反应风格的控制方法综述","authors":"A. Costa, N. H. Filho","doi":"10.9788/TP2019.2-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many diff erent methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual’s trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identifi ed several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found.","PeriodicalId":142063,"journal":{"name":"Temas em Psicologia","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review\",\"authors\":\"A. Costa, N. H. Filho\",\"doi\":\"10.9788/TP2019.2-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many diff erent methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual’s trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identifi ed several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Temas em Psicologia\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Temas em Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.2-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temas em Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2019.2-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

回应风格是回应自我报告项目的系统方式,可能会影响工具得分的有效性和准确性。其中一种偏差是极端反应(ER),当一个人倾向于只使用反应量表中的极端评分类别(例如,完全不同意或完全同意)时,就会发生这种偏差,而不考虑项目的内容。人们开发了许多不同的方法,旨在识别和控制极端反应,以更准确地评估个体的特征。本研究的目的是对自我报告心理测量工具中极端反应统计控制的这些主要技术进行系统的回顾。我们确定了几种分析方法,我们将其组织成七个集群,从简单的极端反应数量计数到现代统计方法的使用,作为单一和多维的项目反应理论。讨论了每种方法的优点和局限性。我们还提供了一个概述我们发现的不同可用方法的一般图表。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Methods for the Control of Extreme Response Styles in Self-Report Instruments: A Review
Response styles are systematic ways of responding to self-report items that may impact the validity and the precision of scores from instruments. One of these biases is extreme responding (ER), which occurs when a person tends to use only extreme rating categories from a response scale (e.g., totally disagree or totally agree), irrespective of item content. Many diff erent methods were developed that aim to identify and control extreme responses to provide a more accurate assessment of an individual’s trait. The aim of this study is to perform a systematic review of these main techniques for statistical control of extreme responses in psychometric instruments of self-report. We identifi ed several analytical approaches, which we organized into seven clusters, from simple count of the numbers of extreme response to the use of modern statistics methods, as Item Response Theory uni and multidimensional. Advantages and limitations of each method are discussed. We also present a general diagram that summarizes the distinct available methods we found.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Health Professionals Men tal Health A oo at their Su erin Peers as Agents of Dating Violence Prevention: Feasibility Analysis of an Intervention Community Resilience: A Case Study of a Community of Fortaleza, CE Representational Structure of Vitiligo: Non-Restrictive Skin Marks Cannabis Legalization: Perceptions of Psychiatrists and Recovering Users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1