协作机制:为共享工作空间开发低成本的可用性评估方法

C. Gutwin, S. Greenberg
{"title":"协作机制:为共享工作空间开发低成本的可用性评估方法","authors":"C. Gutwin, S. Greenberg","doi":"10.1109/ENABL.2000.883711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce a conceptual framework that articulates the mechanics of collaboration for shared-workspace groupware: the low level actions and interactions that must be carried out to complete a task in a shared manner. These include communication, coordination, planning, monitoring, assistance, and protection. The framework also includes three general measures of these mechanics: effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. The underlying idea of the framework is that some usability problems in groupware systems are not inherently tied to the social context in which the system is used but rather are a result of poor support for the basic activities of collaborative work in shared spaces. We believe that existing low-cost evaluation methods-heuristic evaluation, walkthroughs, user observations and questionnaires-can be modified to include this framework in a way that helps a groupware evaluator uncover these usability problems.","PeriodicalId":435283,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-06-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"259","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The mechanics of collaboration: developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces\",\"authors\":\"C. Gutwin, S. Greenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ENABL.2000.883711\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce a conceptual framework that articulates the mechanics of collaboration for shared-workspace groupware: the low level actions and interactions that must be carried out to complete a task in a shared manner. These include communication, coordination, planning, monitoring, assistance, and protection. The framework also includes three general measures of these mechanics: effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. The underlying idea of the framework is that some usability problems in groupware systems are not inherently tied to the social context in which the system is used but rather are a result of poor support for the basic activities of collaborative work in shared spaces. We believe that existing low-cost evaluation methods-heuristic evaluation, walkthroughs, user observations and questionnaires-can be modified to include this framework in a way that helps a groupware evaluator uncover these usability problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":435283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000)\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-06-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"259\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.2000.883711\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings IEEE 9th International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WET ICE 2000)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ENABL.2000.883711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 259

摘要

我们引入了一个概念框架,阐明了共享工作空间群件的协作机制:以共享方式完成任务必须执行的低级动作和交互。这包括沟通、协调、规划、监测、援助和保护。该框架还包括这些机制的三个一般度量:有效性、效率和满意度。该框架的基本思想是,群件系统中的一些可用性问题与使用系统的社会环境没有内在联系,而是由于对共享空间中协作工作的基本活动支持不足造成的。我们相信现有的低成本评估方法——启发式评估、演练、用户观察和问卷调查——可以被修改以包含这个框架,从而帮助群件评估者发现这些可用性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The mechanics of collaboration: developing low cost usability evaluation methods for shared workspaces
We introduce a conceptual framework that articulates the mechanics of collaboration for shared-workspace groupware: the low level actions and interactions that must be carried out to complete a task in a shared manner. These include communication, coordination, planning, monitoring, assistance, and protection. The framework also includes three general measures of these mechanics: effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction. The underlying idea of the framework is that some usability problems in groupware systems are not inherently tied to the social context in which the system is used but rather are a result of poor support for the basic activities of collaborative work in shared spaces. We believe that existing low-cost evaluation methods-heuristic evaluation, walkthroughs, user observations and questionnaires-can be modified to include this framework in a way that helps a groupware evaluator uncover these usability problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Techniques for evaluating collaboration toolkits Tapping alert protocol ETOILE - an Environment for Team, Organizational and Individual Learning in Emergencies Secure multicast software delivery Developing and evaluating collaborative engineering studios
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1