{"title":"“代表性”元启发式设计模式","authors":"J. Swan, Zoltan A. Kocsis, A. Lisitsa","doi":"10.1145/2598394.2609842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1. PROBLEM STATEMENT The ‘Representative’ pattern is applicable when it is desirable to eliminate redundancy in the search process: • It is often the case that some function f of interest in optimization gives a many-to-one mapping, i.e. it induces equivalence classes over the image of f . If f is a fitness function, this can lead to plateaus in the fitness landscape. • It may be that the elimination of redundancy allows search to be performed in a smaller (‘quotient’) space that can be searched using methods (possibly even exact techniques) not applicable to the original space. • In the case of GP-trees, syntactically inequivalent but semantically equivalent representations (e.g. x + x, 2 ∗x) can lead to a lack of gradient in genotype-to-phenotype mappings, which may make the space of programs harder to search effectively.","PeriodicalId":298232,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The 'representative' metaheuristic design pattern\",\"authors\":\"J. Swan, Zoltan A. Kocsis, A. Lisitsa\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2598394.2609842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1. PROBLEM STATEMENT The ‘Representative’ pattern is applicable when it is desirable to eliminate redundancy in the search process: • It is often the case that some function f of interest in optimization gives a many-to-one mapping, i.e. it induces equivalence classes over the image of f . If f is a fitness function, this can lead to plateaus in the fitness landscape. • It may be that the elimination of redundancy allows search to be performed in a smaller (‘quotient’) space that can be searched using methods (possibly even exact techniques) not applicable to the original space. • In the case of GP-trees, syntactically inequivalent but semantically equivalent representations (e.g. x + x, 2 ∗x) can lead to a lack of gradient in genotype-to-phenotype mappings, which may make the space of programs harder to search effectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":298232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2598394.2609842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2598394.2609842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
1. PROBLEM STATEMENT The ‘Representative’ pattern is applicable when it is desirable to eliminate redundancy in the search process: • It is often the case that some function f of interest in optimization gives a many-to-one mapping, i.e. it induces equivalence classes over the image of f . If f is a fitness function, this can lead to plateaus in the fitness landscape. • It may be that the elimination of redundancy allows search to be performed in a smaller (‘quotient’) space that can be searched using methods (possibly even exact techniques) not applicable to the original space. • In the case of GP-trees, syntactically inequivalent but semantically equivalent representations (e.g. x + x, 2 ∗x) can lead to a lack of gradient in genotype-to-phenotype mappings, which may make the space of programs harder to search effectively.