提高标准:UTEC如何推动学生而不让他们失败

Daniel Akamine, M. Power
{"title":"提高标准:UTEC如何推动学生而不让他们失败","authors":"Daniel Akamine, M. Power","doi":"10.1109/EDUNINE.2019.8875752","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since launching its new educational model (i+), UTEC has focused on reducing topics but demanding a deeper conceptual understanding for its students. This gets reflected on a gradually increased difficulty. UTEC, as a fast-growing small university, it's starting to face new challenges like massification of education without compromising personalization and quality. UTEC is trying to figure out a way to tackle those challenges by identifying conceptual gaps and closing them with the use of educational technology. The result so far is positive in some Science courses: it allowed UTEC to gradually increase the difficulty bar of some evaluations for preparation by 70% in order to close the gaps between evaluations. This allowed teachers to develop more student-centered classes and aim to higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy. This article will describe the process, initial results, as well as the future challenges related to massive courses, personalization, and closing difficulty gaps.","PeriodicalId":211092,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raising the bar:how UTEC is pushing students without letting them fall\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Akamine, M. Power\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EDUNINE.2019.8875752\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Since launching its new educational model (i+), UTEC has focused on reducing topics but demanding a deeper conceptual understanding for its students. This gets reflected on a gradually increased difficulty. UTEC, as a fast-growing small university, it's starting to face new challenges like massification of education without compromising personalization and quality. UTEC is trying to figure out a way to tackle those challenges by identifying conceptual gaps and closing them with the use of educational technology. The result so far is positive in some Science courses: it allowed UTEC to gradually increase the difficulty bar of some evaluations for preparation by 70% in order to close the gaps between evaluations. This allowed teachers to develop more student-centered classes and aim to higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy. This article will describe the process, initial results, as well as the future challenges related to massive courses, personalization, and closing difficulty gaps.\",\"PeriodicalId\":211092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE.2019.8875752\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE World Conference on Engineering Education (EDUNINE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUNINE.2019.8875752","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自从推出新的教育模式(i+)以来,UTEC一直专注于减少主题,但要求学生对概念有更深的理解。这反映在逐渐增加的难度上。UTEC作为一所快速发展的小型大学,在不影响个性化和质量的情况下,开始面临教育大众化的新挑战。UTEC正试图找到一种解决这些挑战的方法,通过识别概念上的差距,并利用教育技术来缩小差距。到目前为止,一些科学课程的结果是积极的:它允许UTEC逐步将一些准备评价的难度提高70%,以缩小评价之间的差距。这使得教师能够开发更多以学生为中心的课程,并以布鲁姆分类法的更高层次为目标。本文将描述这一过程、初步结果,以及与大规模课程、个性化和缩小难度差距相关的未来挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Raising the bar:how UTEC is pushing students without letting them fall
Since launching its new educational model (i+), UTEC has focused on reducing topics but demanding a deeper conceptual understanding for its students. This gets reflected on a gradually increased difficulty. UTEC, as a fast-growing small university, it's starting to face new challenges like massification of education without compromising personalization and quality. UTEC is trying to figure out a way to tackle those challenges by identifying conceptual gaps and closing them with the use of educational technology. The result so far is positive in some Science courses: it allowed UTEC to gradually increase the difficulty bar of some evaluations for preparation by 70% in order to close the gaps between evaluations. This allowed teachers to develop more student-centered classes and aim to higher levels of Bloom's taxonomy. This article will describe the process, initial results, as well as the future challenges related to massive courses, personalization, and closing difficulty gaps.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Work in Progress: Design and implementation of a didactic module with manual interface, PLC interface and PC serial interface for teaching process control techniques Artificial intelligence as a support technique for university learning Constructing Writing Assignments For First-Year Engineering Students Assessment of the Social Competence of Teamwork as Part of the Training of Civil Engineers of an Engineering School in Lima Mobile apps use in indigenous languaje education of pre school children of Huitoto people in Peruvian Amazon
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1