墨西哥:基底格架和前白垩纪地层学

U. Martens, Roberto S. Molina Garza
{"title":"墨西哥:基底格架和前白垩纪地层学","authors":"U. Martens, Roberto S. Molina Garza","doi":"10.1130/2021.2546(01)","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Provenance determinations of sediment deposited in circum–Gulf of Mexico basins rely on understanding the geologic elements present in the basement provinces located from northeast Mexico to Honduras. Relevant geologic features of these provinces are herein summarized in text and pictorial form, and they include the Huizachal-Peregrina uplift, western Gulf of Mexico, Huayacocotla, Zapoteco, Mixteca, Xolapa, Juchatengo, Cuicateco, Mixtequita, south-central Chiapas, southeast Chiapas, western Guatemala, central Guatemala, Maya Mountains, and the Chortis block. We recognized basement elements of local character that serve as fingerprints for specific source areas. However, many elements are ubiquitous, such as 1.4–0.9 Ga, high-grade metamorphic rocks that occur both as broad exposures and as inliers in otherwise reworked crust. Xenocrystic and detrital zircon of Mesoproterozoic age is very common and hence not diagnostic of provenance. Neoproterozoic rocks are very scarce in Mexican basement provinces. However, Ediacaran–Cambrian detrital zircon grains are found in Mexican Paleozoic strata; these were possibly derived from distant sources in Gondwana and Pangea. Ordovician–Silurian magmatism is present in approximately half the provinces; magmatic detrital zircon of such age is somewhat informative in terms of provenance. More useful populations are detrital zircon grains with Ordovician–Silurian metamorphic overgrowth, which seem to be mainly sourced from the Mixteca region or the southern Chiapas Massif. Devonian basement has only been discovered in the Maya Mountains of Belize, and detrital zir-on of such age seems to be characteristic of that source. A similar case can be made about Carboniferous zircon and the Acatlán Complex, Middle Pennsylvanian zircon and Juchatengo plutons, and Late Triassic zircon and the basement exposed in central Guatemala. In all these cases, the age and geographic extent of the zircon source are restricted and serve as a distinct fingerprint. Plutons of Permian–Early Triassic age are widespread, and detrital zircon grains from them are rather nonspecific indicators of source area. Future dating of detrital white mica using 40Ar-39Ar could help in recognizing Carboniferous–Triassic schist from more restricted schist occurrences such as west Cuicateco (Early Cretaceous) and central Guatemala (Late Cretaceous).","PeriodicalId":284990,"journal":{"name":"Southern and Central Mexico: Basement Framework, Tectonic Evolution, and Provenance of Mesozoic–Cenozoic Basins","volume":"75 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mexico: Basement framework and pre-Cretaceous stratigraphy\",\"authors\":\"U. Martens, Roberto S. Molina Garza\",\"doi\":\"10.1130/2021.2546(01)\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Provenance determinations of sediment deposited in circum–Gulf of Mexico basins rely on understanding the geologic elements present in the basement provinces located from northeast Mexico to Honduras. Relevant geologic features of these provinces are herein summarized in text and pictorial form, and they include the Huizachal-Peregrina uplift, western Gulf of Mexico, Huayacocotla, Zapoteco, Mixteca, Xolapa, Juchatengo, Cuicateco, Mixtequita, south-central Chiapas, southeast Chiapas, western Guatemala, central Guatemala, Maya Mountains, and the Chortis block. We recognized basement elements of local character that serve as fingerprints for specific source areas. However, many elements are ubiquitous, such as 1.4–0.9 Ga, high-grade metamorphic rocks that occur both as broad exposures and as inliers in otherwise reworked crust. Xenocrystic and detrital zircon of Mesoproterozoic age is very common and hence not diagnostic of provenance. Neoproterozoic rocks are very scarce in Mexican basement provinces. However, Ediacaran–Cambrian detrital zircon grains are found in Mexican Paleozoic strata; these were possibly derived from distant sources in Gondwana and Pangea. Ordovician–Silurian magmatism is present in approximately half the provinces; magmatic detrital zircon of such age is somewhat informative in terms of provenance. More useful populations are detrital zircon grains with Ordovician–Silurian metamorphic overgrowth, which seem to be mainly sourced from the Mixteca region or the southern Chiapas Massif. Devonian basement has only been discovered in the Maya Mountains of Belize, and detrital zir-on of such age seems to be characteristic of that source. A similar case can be made about Carboniferous zircon and the Acatlán Complex, Middle Pennsylvanian zircon and Juchatengo plutons, and Late Triassic zircon and the basement exposed in central Guatemala. In all these cases, the age and geographic extent of the zircon source are restricted and serve as a distinct fingerprint. Plutons of Permian–Early Triassic age are widespread, and detrital zircon grains from them are rather nonspecific indicators of source area. Future dating of detrital white mica using 40Ar-39Ar could help in recognizing Carboniferous–Triassic schist from more restricted schist occurrences such as west Cuicateco (Early Cretaceous) and central Guatemala (Late Cretaceous).\",\"PeriodicalId\":284990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern and Central Mexico: Basement Framework, Tectonic Evolution, and Provenance of Mesozoic–Cenozoic Basins\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern and Central Mexico: Basement Framework, Tectonic Evolution, and Provenance of Mesozoic–Cenozoic Basins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1130/2021.2546(01)\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern and Central Mexico: Basement Framework, Tectonic Evolution, and Provenance of Mesozoic–Cenozoic Basins","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1130/2021.2546(01)","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

确定墨西哥湾沿岸盆地沉积的沉积物的来源依赖于对墨西哥东北部至洪都拉斯基底省存在的地质元素的了解。本文以文字和图片的形式总结了这些省份的相关地质特征,包括Huizachal-Peregrina隆起、墨西哥湾西部、Huayacocotla、Zapoteco、Mixteca、Xolapa、Juchatengo、Cuicateco、Mixtequita、恰帕斯中南部、恰帕斯东南部、危地马拉西部、危地马拉中部、玛雅山脉和Chortis地块。我们识别了当地特色的地下室元素,作为特定来源区域的指纹。然而,许多元素是普遍存在的,如1.4-0.9 Ga,高品位变质岩,既出现在广泛的暴露中,也出现在重新加工的地壳中。中元古代的异晶锆石和碎屑锆石非常普遍,因此不能诊断物源。墨西哥基底省新元古代岩石十分稀少。而在墨西哥古生代地层中发现埃迪卡拉-寒武系碎屑锆石颗粒;这些可能来自遥远的冈瓦纳和盘古大陆。奥陶系—志留系岩浆活动在大约一半省份存在;这种年龄的岩浆碎屑锆石在物源方面具有一定的信息。更有用的种群是奥陶系-志留系变质过度生长的碎屑锆石颗粒,它们似乎主要来自米什特卡地区或恰帕斯地块南部。泥盆纪基底只在伯利兹的玛雅山脉被发现,这种年代的锆石碎屑似乎是该来源的特征。石炭系锆石与Acatlán杂岩、中宾夕法尼亚系锆石与Juchatengo岩体、晚三叠系锆石与危地马拉中部出露的基底也有类似的情况。在所有这些情况下,锆石来源的年龄和地理范围都是有限的,并作为一个独特的指纹。二叠世—早三叠世的岩体分布广泛,其碎屑锆石颗粒对源区的指示不甚明确。利用40Ar-39Ar对白色云母碎屑进行定年,有助于从Cuicateco西部(早白垩世)和Guatemala中部(晚白垩世)等更有限的片岩产状中识别石炭纪-三叠纪片岩。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mexico: Basement framework and pre-Cretaceous stratigraphy
Provenance determinations of sediment deposited in circum–Gulf of Mexico basins rely on understanding the geologic elements present in the basement provinces located from northeast Mexico to Honduras. Relevant geologic features of these provinces are herein summarized in text and pictorial form, and they include the Huizachal-Peregrina uplift, western Gulf of Mexico, Huayacocotla, Zapoteco, Mixteca, Xolapa, Juchatengo, Cuicateco, Mixtequita, south-central Chiapas, southeast Chiapas, western Guatemala, central Guatemala, Maya Mountains, and the Chortis block. We recognized basement elements of local character that serve as fingerprints for specific source areas. However, many elements are ubiquitous, such as 1.4–0.9 Ga, high-grade metamorphic rocks that occur both as broad exposures and as inliers in otherwise reworked crust. Xenocrystic and detrital zircon of Mesoproterozoic age is very common and hence not diagnostic of provenance. Neoproterozoic rocks are very scarce in Mexican basement provinces. However, Ediacaran–Cambrian detrital zircon grains are found in Mexican Paleozoic strata; these were possibly derived from distant sources in Gondwana and Pangea. Ordovician–Silurian magmatism is present in approximately half the provinces; magmatic detrital zircon of such age is somewhat informative in terms of provenance. More useful populations are detrital zircon grains with Ordovician–Silurian metamorphic overgrowth, which seem to be mainly sourced from the Mixteca region or the southern Chiapas Massif. Devonian basement has only been discovered in the Maya Mountains of Belize, and detrital zir-on of such age seems to be characteristic of that source. A similar case can be made about Carboniferous zircon and the Acatlán Complex, Middle Pennsylvanian zircon and Juchatengo plutons, and Late Triassic zircon and the basement exposed in central Guatemala. In all these cases, the age and geographic extent of the zircon source are restricted and serve as a distinct fingerprint. Plutons of Permian–Early Triassic age are widespread, and detrital zircon grains from them are rather nonspecific indicators of source area. Future dating of detrital white mica using 40Ar-39Ar could help in recognizing Carboniferous–Triassic schist from more restricted schist occurrences such as west Cuicateco (Early Cretaceous) and central Guatemala (Late Cretaceous).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Siliciclastic provenance of the Cenozoic stratigraphic succession in the southern Gulf of Mexico: Insights from U-Pb detrital zircon geochronology and heavy minerals analysis Late Cretaceous–Paleocene transition from calcareous platform to basinal deposition in western Chiapas, Mexico: Opening of the Chiapanecan embayment Mexico: Basement framework and pre-Cretaceous stratigraphy Stratigraphic correlation chart of Carboniferous–Paleogene rocks of Mexico, adjacent southwestern United States, Central America, and Colombia Metamorphic evolution of Proterozoic ultramafic rocks from the Oaxacan Complex (Oaxaca State, southern Mexico): Tectonic implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1