通过对直线方程的现实数学教育培养学生的创造性思维能力

Arta Maisela, R. Johar, Suhartati Suhartati
{"title":"通过对直线方程的现实数学教育培养学生的创造性思维能力","authors":"Arta Maisela, R. Johar, Suhartati Suhartati","doi":"10.29408/jel.v9i2.7697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Indonesian students' creative thinking skill is low. One alternative to improve students' creative thinking skills is to implement realistic mathematics education. This study aimed to determine the difference in the average score of the creative thinking skills of students taught through realistic mathematics education, and students taught through the expository method on the straight-line equation topic. This study is experimental research with a post-test-only control in a class of eight-grade in one of the junior high schools in Aceh, Indonesia. The sample in this study was 30 students in the control group and 32 students in the experimental group. The instrument was a creative thinking test. The data were analyzed using a t-test. Based on the analysis, the average score of the creative thinking skill of students taught through realistic mathematics education was better than those taught through the expository method on the straight-line equation topic. Teachers are expected to guide students to solve challenging real problems to develop their creativity.","PeriodicalId":109114,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Elemen","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Students’ creative thinking skill through realistic mathematics education on straight-line equation\",\"authors\":\"Arta Maisela, R. Johar, Suhartati Suhartati\",\"doi\":\"10.29408/jel.v9i2.7697\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Indonesian students' creative thinking skill is low. One alternative to improve students' creative thinking skills is to implement realistic mathematics education. This study aimed to determine the difference in the average score of the creative thinking skills of students taught through realistic mathematics education, and students taught through the expository method on the straight-line equation topic. This study is experimental research with a post-test-only control in a class of eight-grade in one of the junior high schools in Aceh, Indonesia. The sample in this study was 30 students in the control group and 32 students in the experimental group. The instrument was a creative thinking test. The data were analyzed using a t-test. Based on the analysis, the average score of the creative thinking skill of students taught through realistic mathematics education was better than those taught through the expository method on the straight-line equation topic. Teachers are expected to guide students to solve challenging real problems to develop their creativity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":109114,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Elemen\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Elemen\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.7697\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Elemen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v9i2.7697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印尼学生的创造性思维能力较低。实施现实数学教育是提高学生创造性思维能力的一种选择。本研究旨在确定采用现实数学教育的学生与采用说明文教学的学生在直线方程题目上的创造性思维能力平均分的差异。本研究是一项实验研究,在印度尼西亚亚齐省一所初中的八年级班级中采用仅限测试的对照方法。本研究的样本为对照组30名学生,实验组32名学生。这个工具是一个创造性思维测试。数据采用t检验进行分析。分析发现,在直线方程题目上,采用现实数学教育的学生的创造性思维能力的平均分优于说明文教学的学生。教师应该引导学生解决具有挑战性的实际问题,以发展他们的创造力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Students’ creative thinking skill through realistic mathematics education on straight-line equation
The Indonesian students' creative thinking skill is low. One alternative to improve students' creative thinking skills is to implement realistic mathematics education. This study aimed to determine the difference in the average score of the creative thinking skills of students taught through realistic mathematics education, and students taught through the expository method on the straight-line equation topic. This study is experimental research with a post-test-only control in a class of eight-grade in one of the junior high schools in Aceh, Indonesia. The sample in this study was 30 students in the control group and 32 students in the experimental group. The instrument was a creative thinking test. The data were analyzed using a t-test. Based on the analysis, the average score of the creative thinking skill of students taught through realistic mathematics education was better than those taught through the expository method on the straight-line equation topic. Teachers are expected to guide students to solve challenging real problems to develop their creativity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of learning video rotation using Palembang tanjak context to determine students’ mathematical reasoning Ratio and proportion through realistic mathematics education and pendidikan matematika realistik Indonesia approach: A systematic literature review Exploration of Unggan weaving in Minang culture: An ethnomathematics study Understanding multiplication concept: Exploring PMRI-enhanced thematic learning using traditional games for primary teachers Crafting math minds: A bibliometric odyssey into innovative didactical designs for learning (2006-2023)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1