关于Goofspiel策略的观察

Mark Grimes, M. Dror
{"title":"关于Goofspiel策略的观察","authors":"Mark Grimes, M. Dror","doi":"10.1109/CIG.2013.6633657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Goofspiel is a zero-sum two player card game in which all information is known by both players. Many strategies exist that leverage random, deterministic, and learning approaches to play, however, no strategy dominates all others. It has been suggested that a hybrid strategy combining two or more of these approaches may provide better results than any of these alone. In this note, we review the strengths and weaknesses of each traditional strategy and make a cursory evaluation of a hybrid `Good' strategy.","PeriodicalId":158902,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Inteligence in Games (CIG)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Observations on strategies for Goofspiel\",\"authors\":\"Mark Grimes, M. Dror\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CIG.2013.6633657\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Goofspiel is a zero-sum two player card game in which all information is known by both players. Many strategies exist that leverage random, deterministic, and learning approaches to play, however, no strategy dominates all others. It has been suggested that a hybrid strategy combining two or more of these approaches may provide better results than any of these alone. In this note, we review the strengths and weaknesses of each traditional strategy and make a cursory evaluation of a hybrid `Good' strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":158902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Inteligence in Games (CIG)\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Inteligence in Games (CIG)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2013.6633657\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Conference on Computational Inteligence in Games (CIG)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CIG.2013.6633657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

Goofspiel是一种零和双人纸牌游戏,其中所有信息都为双方玩家所知。存在许多利用随机、确定性和学习方法进行游戏的策略,但是没有一种策略能够主宰所有其他策略。有人建议,结合两种或两种以上方法的混合策略可能比单独使用其中任何一种方法提供更好的结果。在本文中,我们回顾了每种传统战略的优缺点,并对混合“好”战略进行了粗略的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Observations on strategies for Goofspiel
Goofspiel is a zero-sum two player card game in which all information is known by both players. Many strategies exist that leverage random, deterministic, and learning approaches to play, however, no strategy dominates all others. It has been suggested that a hybrid strategy combining two or more of these approaches may provide better results than any of these alone. In this note, we review the strengths and weaknesses of each traditional strategy and make a cursory evaluation of a hybrid `Good' strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
QL-BT: Enhancing behaviour tree design and implementation with Q-learning Landscape automata for search based procedural content generation The structure of a 3-state finite transducer representation for Prisoner's Dilemma LGOAP: Adaptive layered planning for real-time videogames Evolved weapons for RPG drop systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1