提高人的能力

Belinda Barnet
{"title":"提高人的能力","authors":"Belinda Barnet","doi":"10.1145/3215611.3215615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Doug's Augmenting the Intellect framework had a deep *ethical* component - a component that is missing in the design of deep data collection platforms like Facebook and the algorithms that make inferences based on that data for advertisers (\"machine learning\"). The current ethical framework is skewed against users and against transparency: we are seen not as human beings but as data. Engelbart wanted us to use computers to advance us as a species.","PeriodicalId":356462,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boosting Human Capability\",\"authors\":\"Belinda Barnet\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3215611.3215615\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Doug's Augmenting the Intellect framework had a deep *ethical* component - a component that is missing in the design of deep data collection platforms like Facebook and the algorithms that make inferences based on that data for advertisers (\\\"machine learning\\\"). The current ethical framework is skewed against users and against transparency: we are seen not as human beings but as data. Engelbart wanted us to use computers to advance us as a species.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3215611.3215615\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3215611.3215615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

道格的“增强智力”框架有一个深刻的“道德”成分——这是Facebook等深度数据收集平台的设计中缺失的成分,也是广告商根据这些数据进行推断的算法(“机器学习”)。目前的道德框架对用户和透明度都有偏见:我们被视为数据,而不是人类。恩格尔巴特想让我们用电脑来推动人类进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Boosting Human Capability
Doug's Augmenting the Intellect framework had a deep *ethical* component - a component that is missing in the design of deep data collection platforms like Facebook and the algorithms that make inferences based on that data for advertisers ("machine learning"). The current ethical framework is skewed against users and against transparency: we are seen not as human beings but as data. Engelbart wanted us to use computers to advance us as a species.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Multimodal Interaction with Hypermedia Structures Lessons Learned from Early Hypertext Research at the University of Maryland Spatial Hypertext for End-User Development Tools Navigating Data Over Time: Including the Fourth Dimension in Visualizing Knowledge Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Human Factors in Hypertext
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1