{"title":"面对与南非既判力执行相关的选定困难，参考Samancor v Rham Equipment (532/13) [2014] ZASCA 66","authors":"Howard Chitimira","doi":"10.4314/ldd.v20i1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 Nazzini R “Remedies at the seat and enforcement of international arbitral awards: res judicata, issue estoppel and abuse of process in English law” (2014) 7(1) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 139 at 149-158; Sinai Y “Reconsidering res judicata: a comparative perspective” (2011) 21 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 353 at 357-400; Wunsh B “Is issue estoppel part of our law?” (1990) 2 Stell LR 198 at 198-218; and Roodt C “Reflections on finality in arbitration” (2012) 45(2) De Jure 485 at 498-503. LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT","PeriodicalId":341103,"journal":{"name":"Law, Democracy and Development","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Confronting selected difficulties associated with the enforcement of res judicata in South Africa with reference to Samancor v Rham Equipment (532/13) [2014] ZASCA 66\",\"authors\":\"Howard Chitimira\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/ldd.v20i1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1 Nazzini R “Remedies at the seat and enforcement of international arbitral awards: res judicata, issue estoppel and abuse of process in English law” (2014) 7(1) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 139 at 149-158; Sinai Y “Reconsidering res judicata: a comparative perspective” (2011) 21 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 353 at 357-400; Wunsh B “Is issue estoppel part of our law?” (1990) 2 Stell LR 198 at 198-218; and Roodt C “Reflections on finality in arbitration” (2012) 45(2) De Jure 485 at 498-503. LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT\",\"PeriodicalId\":341103,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law, Democracy and Development\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law, Democracy and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/ldd.v20i1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law, Democracy and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ldd.v20i1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
[1]刘志强，“国际仲裁裁决在地救济与执行:既判力、禁言与程序滥用”，《国际仲裁研究》(2014)第7期。“对既判力的再思考:比较视角”(2011)21 Duke Journal of comparative and International Law，第353期，第357-400页;问题禁止反悔是我们法律的一部分吗?“(1990)2 Stell LR 198，第198-218页;陈志强，《关于仲裁终局性的思考》(2012)45(2)De Jure 485: 498-503。法治民主与发展法治民主与发展
Confronting selected difficulties associated with the enforcement of res judicata in South Africa with reference to Samancor v Rham Equipment (532/13) [2014] ZASCA 66
1 Nazzini R “Remedies at the seat and enforcement of international arbitral awards: res judicata, issue estoppel and abuse of process in English law” (2014) 7(1) Contemporary Asia Arbitration Journal 139 at 149-158; Sinai Y “Reconsidering res judicata: a comparative perspective” (2011) 21 Duke Journal of Comparative & International Law 353 at 357-400; Wunsh B “Is issue estoppel part of our law?” (1990) 2 Stell LR 198 at 198-218; and Roodt C “Reflections on finality in arbitration” (2012) 45(2) De Jure 485 at 498-503. LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT LAW DEMOCRACY & DEVELOPMENT
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
