法律确定性与合法性之间(并非总是)难以平衡:欧洲法院和欧洲人权法院判例法对国家既判力的影响

Michele Grassi
{"title":"法律确定性与合法性之间(并非总是)难以平衡:欧洲法院和欧洲人权法院判例法对国家既判力的影响","authors":"Michele Grassi","doi":"10.1163/27725650-03010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nThis note examines a recent judgment of the Corte di Cassazione, in which the Court rejected an opposition against the enforcement of a final judgment that was purportedly irreconcilable with later rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“cjeu”) and the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) on very similar cases. The impact of judgments rendered by international tribunals on domestic procedural rules concerning res judicata often raises complex issues. This is mainly due to the difficult balance between the principle of legal certainty on one hand, and the principles of legality and effectiveness of European Union (“EU”) law and the human rights protection system, on the other. Nonetheless, in the case under review, the rules and principles developed through the years by the cjeu and the Italian Corte Costituzionale, that will be analysed in this note, provided clear guidance to the Corte di Cassazione.","PeriodicalId":275877,"journal":{"name":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A (Not Always) Difficult Balance between Legal Certainty and Legality: The Effects of cjeu and ECtHR Case Law on National Res Judicata\",\"authors\":\"Michele Grassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/27725650-03010009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nThis note examines a recent judgment of the Corte di Cassazione, in which the Court rejected an opposition against the enforcement of a final judgment that was purportedly irreconcilable with later rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“cjeu”) and the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) on very similar cases. The impact of judgments rendered by international tribunals on domestic procedural rules concerning res judicata often raises complex issues. This is mainly due to the difficult balance between the principle of legal certainty on one hand, and the principles of legality and effectiveness of European Union (“EU”) law and the human rights protection system, on the other. Nonetheless, in the case under review, the rules and principles developed through the years by the cjeu and the Italian Corte Costituzionale, that will be analysed in this note, provided clear guidance to the Corte di Cassazione.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Italian Review of International and Comparative Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/27725650-03010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本说明审查了卡萨齐奥尼法院最近的一项判决,其中法院驳回了反对执行一项最终判决的反对意见,该判决据称与欧洲联盟法院(“欧洲法院”)和欧洲人权法院(“欧洲人权法院”)后来就非常类似的案件作出的裁决不可调和。国际法庭作出的判决对有关既判力的国内程序规则的影响常常引起复杂的问题。这主要是由于法律确定性原则与欧盟(“EU”)法律和人权保障体系的合法性和有效性原则之间难以平衡。尽管如此,在审查中的案件中,本说明将分析的欧洲法院和意大利宪法法院多年来制定的规则和原则为卡萨齐翁法院提供了明确的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A (Not Always) Difficult Balance between Legal Certainty and Legality: The Effects of cjeu and ECtHR Case Law on National Res Judicata
This note examines a recent judgment of the Corte di Cassazione, in which the Court rejected an opposition against the enforcement of a final judgment that was purportedly irreconcilable with later rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“cjeu”) and the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) on very similar cases. The impact of judgments rendered by international tribunals on domestic procedural rules concerning res judicata often raises complex issues. This is mainly due to the difficult balance between the principle of legal certainty on one hand, and the principles of legality and effectiveness of European Union (“EU”) law and the human rights protection system, on the other. Nonetheless, in the case under review, the rules and principles developed through the years by the cjeu and the Italian Corte Costituzionale, that will be analysed in this note, provided clear guidance to the Corte di Cassazione.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Victim Status of Individuals in Climate Change Litigation before the ECtHR State Immunity from Civil Jurisdiction in Transboundary Environmental Litigations The Deterrent Effect of Financial Sanctions Pursuant to Article 260(2) tfeu in the Context of Violations of Environmental Obligations Authorisations to Emit Greenhouse Gases – A Conflict-of-Laws Perspective Upholding Maritime Migrants’ Rights at the Borders of Europe – J.A. and Others v. Italy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1