英国脱欧后果——欧洲药品管理局搬迁

P. Trendafilova, Tatyana Benisheva, D. Sidjimova, Bilyana Polyakova
{"title":"英国脱欧后果——欧洲药品管理局搬迁","authors":"P. Trendafilova, Tatyana Benisheva, D. Sidjimova, Bilyana Polyakova","doi":"10.14748/SSP.V6I1.5976","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The UK decision to leave the European Union (BREXIT) has many potential consequences for the health of European citizens. One of the actions already taken has been the decision to move the location of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) from Canary Wharf in London to Amsterdam from April 2019. Aim The aim of this article is to analyze the EU criteria for the process of EMA relocation from London to Amsterdam based on the comparison of the EMA bids placed by the EU candidates and the indicators among those member states (MSs). Materials and Methods Documentary and analytical methods are used to provide scientific data on the decision of EMA relocation from London to Amsterdam and the consequences of BREXIT from a drug policy point of view. Many different indicators, like accommodation, living cost were compared and surveyed in the MSs. Results EU opened procedure for EMA relocation after BREXIT in 2017. A total of 19 cities have applied to host the EMA headquarters, including Bulgaria, with Amsterdam winning the battle. EMA is working with the Dutch authorities and the relocation of EMA to Amsterdam is a fact. Bulgaria, Hungary, and Croatia were the top three countries with the lowest possible living costs, and accommodation. Conclusion After EMA relocation to Amsterdam as a result of BREXIT, the pharmaceutical industry is dealing with significant implications in order not to lose its market access. Many innovative and generic medicines across the MSs updated their marketing authorizations due to the fact that the exclusion of the UK from all medicines authorization  procedures should be finalised  by the end of March 2019.","PeriodicalId":186809,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Scientifica Pharmaceutica","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BREXIT consequences - relocation of the European Medicines Agency\",\"authors\":\"P. Trendafilova, Tatyana Benisheva, D. Sidjimova, Bilyana Polyakova\",\"doi\":\"10.14748/SSP.V6I1.5976\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction The UK decision to leave the European Union (BREXIT) has many potential consequences for the health of European citizens. One of the actions already taken has been the decision to move the location of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) from Canary Wharf in London to Amsterdam from April 2019. Aim The aim of this article is to analyze the EU criteria for the process of EMA relocation from London to Amsterdam based on the comparison of the EMA bids placed by the EU candidates and the indicators among those member states (MSs). Materials and Methods Documentary and analytical methods are used to provide scientific data on the decision of EMA relocation from London to Amsterdam and the consequences of BREXIT from a drug policy point of view. Many different indicators, like accommodation, living cost were compared and surveyed in the MSs. Results EU opened procedure for EMA relocation after BREXIT in 2017. A total of 19 cities have applied to host the EMA headquarters, including Bulgaria, with Amsterdam winning the battle. EMA is working with the Dutch authorities and the relocation of EMA to Amsterdam is a fact. Bulgaria, Hungary, and Croatia were the top three countries with the lowest possible living costs, and accommodation. Conclusion After EMA relocation to Amsterdam as a result of BREXIT, the pharmaceutical industry is dealing with significant implications in order not to lose its market access. Many innovative and generic medicines across the MSs updated their marketing authorizations due to the fact that the exclusion of the UK from all medicines authorization  procedures should be finalised  by the end of March 2019.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scripta Scientifica Pharmaceutica\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scripta Scientifica Pharmaceutica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14748/SSP.V6I1.5976\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Scientifica Pharmaceutica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14748/SSP.V6I1.5976","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

英国决定离开欧盟(BREXIT)对欧洲公民的健康有许多潜在的后果。已经采取的行动之一是决定从2019年4月起将欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的所在地从伦敦的金丝雀码头迁至阿姆斯特丹。本文的目的是分析欧盟标准的EMA从伦敦搬迁到阿姆斯特丹的过程中,基于欧盟候选国的EMA投标和这些成员国(MSs)之间的指标的比较。材料和方法采用文献和分析方法,从药物政策的角度提供EMA从伦敦搬迁到阿姆斯特丹的决定和英国脱欧的后果的科学数据。许多不同的指标,如住宿,生活成本在MSs中进行了比较和调查。结果欧盟在2017年英国脱欧后开放了EMA搬迁程序。包括保加利亚在内,共有19个城市申请设立欧洲药品管理局总部,阿姆斯特丹最终胜出。EMA正在与荷兰当局合作,将EMA迁至阿姆斯特丹是一个事实。保加利亚、匈牙利和克罗地亚是生活和住宿成本最低的前三个国家。由于英国脱欧,EMA搬迁到阿姆斯特丹后,制药行业正在处理重大影响,以不失去其市场准入。ms中的许多创新和仿制药更新了其上市许可,因为英国被排除在所有药物授权程序之外的事实应在2019年3月底之前完成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BREXIT consequences - relocation of the European Medicines Agency
Introduction The UK decision to leave the European Union (BREXIT) has many potential consequences for the health of European citizens. One of the actions already taken has been the decision to move the location of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) from Canary Wharf in London to Amsterdam from April 2019. Aim The aim of this article is to analyze the EU criteria for the process of EMA relocation from London to Amsterdam based on the comparison of the EMA bids placed by the EU candidates and the indicators among those member states (MSs). Materials and Methods Documentary and analytical methods are used to provide scientific data on the decision of EMA relocation from London to Amsterdam and the consequences of BREXIT from a drug policy point of view. Many different indicators, like accommodation, living cost were compared and surveyed in the MSs. Results EU opened procedure for EMA relocation after BREXIT in 2017. A total of 19 cities have applied to host the EMA headquarters, including Bulgaria, with Amsterdam winning the battle. EMA is working with the Dutch authorities and the relocation of EMA to Amsterdam is a fact. Bulgaria, Hungary, and Croatia were the top three countries with the lowest possible living costs, and accommodation. Conclusion After EMA relocation to Amsterdam as a result of BREXIT, the pharmaceutical industry is dealing with significant implications in order not to lose its market access. Many innovative and generic medicines across the MSs updated their marketing authorizations due to the fact that the exclusion of the UK from all medicines authorization  procedures should be finalised  by the end of March 2019.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DPPH antiradical activity and total phenolic content of methanol and ethanol extracts from macroalgae (Ulva rigida) and microalgae (Chlorella) Analysis of factors affecting adherence to therapy in patients with chronic diseases Detection techniques of circular RNAs as new biomarkers in systemic lupus erythematosus Biodiversity and healing activities of medicinal plants in the area of Kamchia Nature Complex Characteristics of acute intoxications with regard to capacity for effective doctor-patient communication and competent informed decisions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1