等离子体减缓工艺对RAR纳米纹理熔融二氧化硅266nm脉冲LiDT的影响

Laser Damage Pub Date : 2022-12-02 DOI:10.1117/12.2642768
Amile N. Zaaf, H. S. Small, Tadd M. LeRocque, Andrew R. Robson, A. Manni, D. S. Hobbs
{"title":"等离子体减缓工艺对RAR纳米纹理熔融二氧化硅266nm脉冲LiDT的影响","authors":"Amile N. Zaaf, H. S. Small, Tadd M. LeRocque, Andrew R. Robson, A. Manni, D. S. Hobbs","doi":"10.1117/12.2642768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pulsed laser induced damage threshold (LiDT) of Random Anti-Reflective (RAR) nano-textured fused silica optics has been shown to be many times higher than thin-film AR coated optics at wavelengths ranging from the near UV through the NIR. Because an RAR nano-texture is formed by a plasma etch process that removes part of the optic surface, the observed increase in damage resistance has kept track with the LiDT advances attained by low roughness super-polishing and damage pre-cursor mitigation techniques. In this work, nano-second pulse LiDT testing of RAR nano-textured optics was conducted at the deep UV wavelength of 266nm. The effect on 266nm LiDT of the uniform removal of additional surface material from fused silica optics using a dry plasma etch process was investigated. This plasma-polishing (PP), pre-RAR process was varied using fluorine-based chemistries that removed 100-300nm of material from each test surface, with surface roughness then characterized using white-light interferometry. Photothermal interferometry confirmed that no surface absorption was added by the PP, RAR, and PP-RAR plasma etching. Both standard grade, and ultra-low bulk absorption (low-OH) fused silica were included in the tests. RAR nanotextured surfaces showed an average damage threshold of 8.4 J/cm2, a level 3 times higher than a commercially available thin-film AR coated surface. Unexpected from pulsed LiDT testing at many longer wavelengths, all plasma etched surfaces exhibited less than half the damage threshold of the untreated, as-polished fused silica surfaces, and there was no observed correlation with surface roughness or plasma etch depth. From work by others it was theorized that exposure to the deep UV photons generated by the plasma might induce absorptive electronic defects in the fused silica material that could explain the reduced damage resistance relative to non-exposed surfaces. As an initial test of this concept an RAR nano-textured sample was baked at 400C to remove the suspected electronic defect. The subsequent pulsed LiDT of this one annealed sample was found to be 15.5 J/cm2, nearly double that of all other plasma etched samples. Further work to confirm this result is on-going.","PeriodicalId":202227,"journal":{"name":"Laser Damage","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a plasma mitigation process on the 266 nm pulsed LiDT of RAR nano-textured fused silica\",\"authors\":\"Amile N. Zaaf, H. S. Small, Tadd M. LeRocque, Andrew R. Robson, A. Manni, D. S. Hobbs\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2642768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The pulsed laser induced damage threshold (LiDT) of Random Anti-Reflective (RAR) nano-textured fused silica optics has been shown to be many times higher than thin-film AR coated optics at wavelengths ranging from the near UV through the NIR. Because an RAR nano-texture is formed by a plasma etch process that removes part of the optic surface, the observed increase in damage resistance has kept track with the LiDT advances attained by low roughness super-polishing and damage pre-cursor mitigation techniques. In this work, nano-second pulse LiDT testing of RAR nano-textured optics was conducted at the deep UV wavelength of 266nm. The effect on 266nm LiDT of the uniform removal of additional surface material from fused silica optics using a dry plasma etch process was investigated. This plasma-polishing (PP), pre-RAR process was varied using fluorine-based chemistries that removed 100-300nm of material from each test surface, with surface roughness then characterized using white-light interferometry. Photothermal interferometry confirmed that no surface absorption was added by the PP, RAR, and PP-RAR plasma etching. Both standard grade, and ultra-low bulk absorption (low-OH) fused silica were included in the tests. RAR nanotextured surfaces showed an average damage threshold of 8.4 J/cm2, a level 3 times higher than a commercially available thin-film AR coated surface. Unexpected from pulsed LiDT testing at many longer wavelengths, all plasma etched surfaces exhibited less than half the damage threshold of the untreated, as-polished fused silica surfaces, and there was no observed correlation with surface roughness or plasma etch depth. From work by others it was theorized that exposure to the deep UV photons generated by the plasma might induce absorptive electronic defects in the fused silica material that could explain the reduced damage resistance relative to non-exposed surfaces. As an initial test of this concept an RAR nano-textured sample was baked at 400C to remove the suspected electronic defect. The subsequent pulsed LiDT of this one annealed sample was found to be 15.5 J/cm2, nearly double that of all other plasma etched samples. Further work to confirm this result is on-going.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Laser Damage\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Laser Damage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2642768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Laser Damage","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2642768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随机抗反射(RAR)纳米纹理熔融石英光学器件的脉冲激光诱导损伤阈值(LiDT)在近紫外到近红外波长范围内比薄膜AR涂层光学器件高许多倍。由于RAR纳米纹理是通过等离子蚀刻工艺形成的,该工艺去除了部分光学表面,因此观察到的抗损伤性的增加与低粗糙度超级抛光和损伤预光标缓解技术所取得的LiDT进展保持一致。本文在深紫外波长266nm下对RAR纳米纹理光学器件进行了纳秒脉冲LiDT测试。研究了用干等离子体蚀刻工艺均匀去除熔融石英光学元件表面附加材料对266nm LiDT的影响。这种等离子抛光(PP),预rar工艺使用氟基化学物质进行变化,从每个测试表面去除100-300nm的材料,然后使用白光干涉测量法表征表面粗糙度。光热干涉测量证实,PP、RAR和PP-RAR等离子体刻蚀没有增加表面吸收。标准级和超低体积吸收(低oh)熔融二氧化硅都包括在测试中。RAR纳米织构表面的平均损伤阈值为8.4 J/cm2,是商用AR薄膜涂层表面的3倍。出乎意料的是,在许多较长波长的脉冲LiDT测试中,所有等离子体蚀刻表面的损伤阈值都不到未经处理的、抛光的熔融二氧化硅表面的一半,并且与表面粗糙度或等离子体蚀刻深度没有观察到相关性。根据其他人的工作,理论上认为,暴露在等离子体产生的深紫外光子下可能会导致熔融二氧化硅材料中的吸收性电子缺陷,这可以解释相对于未暴露表面的抗损伤性降低。作为这一概念的初步测试,RAR纳米纹理样品在400℃下烘烤以去除可疑的电子缺陷。该退火样品的后续脉冲LiDT为15.5 J/cm2,几乎是所有其他等离子体蚀刻样品的两倍。进一步确认这一结果的工作正在进行中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of a plasma mitigation process on the 266 nm pulsed LiDT of RAR nano-textured fused silica
The pulsed laser induced damage threshold (LiDT) of Random Anti-Reflective (RAR) nano-textured fused silica optics has been shown to be many times higher than thin-film AR coated optics at wavelengths ranging from the near UV through the NIR. Because an RAR nano-texture is formed by a plasma etch process that removes part of the optic surface, the observed increase in damage resistance has kept track with the LiDT advances attained by low roughness super-polishing and damage pre-cursor mitigation techniques. In this work, nano-second pulse LiDT testing of RAR nano-textured optics was conducted at the deep UV wavelength of 266nm. The effect on 266nm LiDT of the uniform removal of additional surface material from fused silica optics using a dry plasma etch process was investigated. This plasma-polishing (PP), pre-RAR process was varied using fluorine-based chemistries that removed 100-300nm of material from each test surface, with surface roughness then characterized using white-light interferometry. Photothermal interferometry confirmed that no surface absorption was added by the PP, RAR, and PP-RAR plasma etching. Both standard grade, and ultra-low bulk absorption (low-OH) fused silica were included in the tests. RAR nanotextured surfaces showed an average damage threshold of 8.4 J/cm2, a level 3 times higher than a commercially available thin-film AR coated surface. Unexpected from pulsed LiDT testing at many longer wavelengths, all plasma etched surfaces exhibited less than half the damage threshold of the untreated, as-polished fused silica surfaces, and there was no observed correlation with surface roughness or plasma etch depth. From work by others it was theorized that exposure to the deep UV photons generated by the plasma might induce absorptive electronic defects in the fused silica material that could explain the reduced damage resistance relative to non-exposed surfaces. As an initial test of this concept an RAR nano-textured sample was baked at 400C to remove the suspected electronic defect. The subsequent pulsed LiDT of this one annealed sample was found to be 15.5 J/cm2, nearly double that of all other plasma etched samples. Further work to confirm this result is on-going.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
All-glass metasurface laser optics for lensing, antireflections, and waveplates Laser-induced damage of dielectric-enhanced surface-modified single-point-diamond-turned Al-6061 multiband mirrors Optical damage considerations in the design of the matter in extreme condition upgrade (MEC-U) laser systems Broadband, 920-nm mirror thin film damage competition Temporally and spatially resolved photoluminescence of laser-induced damage sites of fused silica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1