俄中边境的民族交往:过去与现在

K. Fedorova
{"title":"俄中边境的民族交往:过去与现在","authors":"K. Fedorova","doi":"10.1353/REG.2018.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article deals with the situation in the Russian-Chinese border area, with a special focus on the process of interethnic communication, both now and in the past. Two sets of data are used for analysis: written sources on the Russian-Chinese pidgin, which was in use in the region in the 18th and 19th centuries and until the end of the 1930s, and the author's field work materials gathered in 2008–10 in the Zabaikalskii territory of Russia and in the Chinese province of Inner Mongolia. The article reveals a similarity in the communicative strategies used by Russian and Chinese speakers in everyday communication at present with those reflected in the sources on the Russian-Chinese pidgin, a fact which implies the stability of linguistic (as well as ethnic) stereotypes.","PeriodicalId":307724,"journal":{"name":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","volume":"756 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interethnic Communication on the Russian-Chinese Border: Its Past and Present\",\"authors\":\"K. Fedorova\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/REG.2018.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article deals with the situation in the Russian-Chinese border area, with a special focus on the process of interethnic communication, both now and in the past. Two sets of data are used for analysis: written sources on the Russian-Chinese pidgin, which was in use in the region in the 18th and 19th centuries and until the end of the 1930s, and the author's field work materials gathered in 2008–10 in the Zabaikalskii territory of Russia and in the Chinese province of Inner Mongolia. The article reveals a similarity in the communicative strategies used by Russian and Chinese speakers in everyday communication at present with those reflected in the sources on the Russian-Chinese pidgin, a fact which implies the stability of linguistic (as well as ethnic) stereotypes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":307724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia\",\"volume\":\"756 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/REG.2018.0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Region: Regional Studies of Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/REG.2018.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文论述了俄中边境地区的情况,特别关注了现在和过去的民族交流过程。本文使用了两组数据进行分析:一组是关于俄中洋泾浜语的书面资料,这种语言在18世纪和19世纪一直使用到20世纪30年代末;另一组是作者2008年至2010年在俄罗斯扎贝加尔斯基地区和中国内蒙古省收集的实地工作资料。本文揭示了目前俄语和汉语使用者在日常交际中所使用的交际策略与俄中洋泾浜语资料中所反映的交际策略的相似性,这一事实暗示了语言(以及民族)刻板印象的稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interethnic Communication on the Russian-Chinese Border: Its Past and Present
Abstract:This article deals with the situation in the Russian-Chinese border area, with a special focus on the process of interethnic communication, both now and in the past. Two sets of data are used for analysis: written sources on the Russian-Chinese pidgin, which was in use in the region in the 18th and 19th centuries and until the end of the 1930s, and the author's field work materials gathered in 2008–10 in the Zabaikalskii territory of Russia and in the Chinese province of Inner Mongolia. The article reveals a similarity in the communicative strategies used by Russian and Chinese speakers in everyday communication at present with those reflected in the sources on the Russian-Chinese pidgin, a fact which implies the stability of linguistic (as well as ethnic) stereotypes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uzbek Migrants in Türkiye: Gender, Satisfaction in Türkiye, and Return Intentions On Arid Ground: Political Ecologies of Empire in Russian Central Asia by Jennifer Keating (review) Analyzing the Compatibility of the Remedial Right of Secession with Regard to the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Arrested Development: The Soviet Union in Ghana, Guinea, and Mali, 1955–1968 by Alessandro Iandolo (review) "Save the Children!": The Symbol of Childhood and (De)Legitimation of Power in Russian Protests, 2017–21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1