基于必需品和非必需品的需求理论

ERN: Monopoly Pub Date : 2016-07-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2653907
Steven R. Beckman, James W. Smith
{"title":"基于必需品和非必需品的需求理论","authors":"Steven R. Beckman, James W. Smith","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2653907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Needs and wants offer a simple, consistent and intuitive foundation for demand. Indifference curves for essential goods bend sharply as use approaches zero because no amount of any other good may substitute for the essential. The sharp curvature implies inelastic demand and gross complementarity with most other goods. Indifference curves for inessentials bend less implying elastic demand and gross substitutability with most other goods. Monopoly theories that depend on elastic demand rule out essential goods. Given the importance of monopolies of life saving drugs, we believe a new monopoly theory, based on the dictator game, will prove valuable.","PeriodicalId":142139,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Monopoly","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Theory of Demand Based on Essential and Inessential Goods\",\"authors\":\"Steven R. Beckman, James W. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2653907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Needs and wants offer a simple, consistent and intuitive foundation for demand. Indifference curves for essential goods bend sharply as use approaches zero because no amount of any other good may substitute for the essential. The sharp curvature implies inelastic demand and gross complementarity with most other goods. Indifference curves for inessentials bend less implying elastic demand and gross substitutability with most other goods. Monopoly theories that depend on elastic demand rule out essential goods. Given the importance of monopolies of life saving drugs, we believe a new monopoly theory, based on the dictator game, will prove valuable.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Monopoly\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Monopoly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2653907\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Monopoly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2653907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

需求和欲望为需求提供了一个简单、一致和直观的基础。当使用量接近零时,必需品的无差异曲线急剧弯曲,因为没有任何其他商品可以替代必需品。尖锐的曲率意味着非弹性需求和与大多数其他商品的总体互补性。非必需品的无差异曲线弯曲较少,这意味着弹性需求和与大多数其他商品的总可替代性。依赖于弹性需求的垄断理论排除了必需品。鉴于救命药物垄断的重要性,我们相信基于独裁者游戏的新垄断理论将被证明是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Theory of Demand Based on Essential and Inessential Goods
Needs and wants offer a simple, consistent and intuitive foundation for demand. Indifference curves for essential goods bend sharply as use approaches zero because no amount of any other good may substitute for the essential. The sharp curvature implies inelastic demand and gross complementarity with most other goods. Indifference curves for inessentials bend less implying elastic demand and gross substitutability with most other goods. Monopoly theories that depend on elastic demand rule out essential goods. Given the importance of monopolies of life saving drugs, we believe a new monopoly theory, based on the dictator game, will prove valuable.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Collective Agreement is Not Inherently Anti Competitive in Japan: Trade Unions, Self-Employed Workers and the Antimonopoly Act The Cost and Benefit of Dynamic Pricing Does Local Competition and Firm Market Power Affect Investment Adviser Misconduct? Monopoly Pricing, Optimal Randomization and Resale Divide and Conquer in Two-Sided Markets: A Potential-Game Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1