从工艺到科学:实证软件工程研究的前进道路

M. Galster, Danny Weyns, A. Tang, R. Kazman, Mehdi Mirakhorli
{"title":"从工艺到科学:实证软件工程研究的前进道路","authors":"M. Galster, Danny Weyns, A. Tang, R. Kazman, Mehdi Mirakhorli","doi":"10.1145/3183399.3183421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empirical software engineering (SE) research is often criticized for poorly designed and reported studies, a lack of replications to build up bodies of knowledge, and little practical relevance. In this paper, we discuss issues in empirical software architecture research as an illustration of these issues in one subfield of SE and as a step towards better understanding empirical research in SE in general. Based on feedback from software architecture researchers and practitioners, we explore why, despite persistent discussions in the SE research community, there are still disagreements about why and how to conduct empirical research. Then, we explore how empirical SE research can progress beyond \"one-off\" studies and endless \"new and exciting\" results toward SE research as a mature science. This would allow us to establish foundations for evaluating existing and future empirical research and help researchers design and publish better studies.","PeriodicalId":212579,"journal":{"name":"2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Technologies Results (ICSE-NIER)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Craft to Science: The Road Ahead for Empirical Software Engineering Research\",\"authors\":\"M. Galster, Danny Weyns, A. Tang, R. Kazman, Mehdi Mirakhorli\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3183399.3183421\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Empirical software engineering (SE) research is often criticized for poorly designed and reported studies, a lack of replications to build up bodies of knowledge, and little practical relevance. In this paper, we discuss issues in empirical software architecture research as an illustration of these issues in one subfield of SE and as a step towards better understanding empirical research in SE in general. Based on feedback from software architecture researchers and practitioners, we explore why, despite persistent discussions in the SE research community, there are still disagreements about why and how to conduct empirical research. Then, we explore how empirical SE research can progress beyond \\\"one-off\\\" studies and endless \\\"new and exciting\\\" results toward SE research as a mature science. This would allow us to establish foundations for evaluating existing and future empirical research and help researchers design and publish better studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212579,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Technologies Results (ICSE-NIER)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Technologies Results (ICSE-NIER)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3183399.3183421\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 IEEE/ACM 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: New Ideas and Emerging Technologies Results (ICSE-NIER)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3183399.3183421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

经验软件工程(SE)研究经常被批评为设计不良和报告不良的研究,缺乏建立知识体系的复制,以及很少的实际相关性。在本文中,我们讨论了实证软件体系结构研究中的问题,作为SE的一个子领域中的这些问题的例证,并作为更好地理解SE的总体实证研究的一步。基于来自软件架构研究者和实践者的反馈,我们探索了为什么,尽管在SE研究社区中有持续的讨论,对于为什么以及如何进行实证研究仍然存在分歧。然后,我们探讨了实证SE研究如何超越“一次性”研究和无休止的“新的和令人兴奋的”结果,使SE研究成为一门成熟的科学。这将使我们能够为评估现有和未来的实证研究建立基础,并帮助研究人员设计和发表更好的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Craft to Science: The Road Ahead for Empirical Software Engineering Research
Empirical software engineering (SE) research is often criticized for poorly designed and reported studies, a lack of replications to build up bodies of knowledge, and little practical relevance. In this paper, we discuss issues in empirical software architecture research as an illustration of these issues in one subfield of SE and as a step towards better understanding empirical research in SE in general. Based on feedback from software architecture researchers and practitioners, we explore why, despite persistent discussions in the SE research community, there are still disagreements about why and how to conduct empirical research. Then, we explore how empirical SE research can progress beyond "one-off" studies and endless "new and exciting" results toward SE research as a mature science. This would allow us to establish foundations for evaluating existing and future empirical research and help researchers design and publish better studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generalizing Specific-Instance Interpolation Proofs with SyGuS Images of Code: Lossy Compression for Native Instructions Enabling Real-Time Feedback in Software Engineering Deep Customization of Multi-tenant SaaS Using Intrusive Microservices Measure Confidence of Assurance Cases in Safety-Critical Domains
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1