揭示安全风险评估中人为因素的作用

Winnie Mbaka
{"title":"揭示安全风险评估中人为因素的作用","authors":"Winnie Mbaka","doi":"10.1145/3573074.3573092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"[Background:] Security-by-design techniques (e.g., STRIDE) are used to elicit system threats before they are exploited. Since security threat assessment is performed on a conceptualised model of the system under analysis, human expertise is relied upon to exhaustively elicit all possible threats. To this end, the outcomes of threat analysis depend on the individual actors involved in the process. However, human expertise can be biased depending on certain or a combination of human factors. [Goal:] With this work, we aim to unveil the effect (if any) of human factors (e.g., gender, age, seniority, educational background, nationality) to security risk assessment. [Method:] To contribute to this body of knowledge, we are conducting a state-of-the-art literature review and several experiments with human participants (experts and non-experts) in the domain of security and risk assessment. First, the topic and technical domain are described in general. Second, preliminary results of the on-going literature review are presented. Finally, a research plan is described including research questions, treatment, and participant recruitment.","PeriodicalId":432885,"journal":{"name":"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Towards Unveiling Effects Of Human Factors Within Security Risk Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Mbaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3573074.3573092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"[Background:] Security-by-design techniques (e.g., STRIDE) are used to elicit system threats before they are exploited. Since security threat assessment is performed on a conceptualised model of the system under analysis, human expertise is relied upon to exhaustively elicit all possible threats. To this end, the outcomes of threat analysis depend on the individual actors involved in the process. However, human expertise can be biased depending on certain or a combination of human factors. [Goal:] With this work, we aim to unveil the effect (if any) of human factors (e.g., gender, age, seniority, educational background, nationality) to security risk assessment. [Method:] To contribute to this body of knowledge, we are conducting a state-of-the-art literature review and several experiments with human participants (experts and non-experts) in the domain of security and risk assessment. First, the topic and technical domain are described in general. Second, preliminary results of the on-going literature review are presented. Finally, a research plan is described including research questions, treatment, and participant recruitment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":432885,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3573074.3573092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3573074.3573092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

[背景:]设计安全技术(例如,STRIDE)用于在系统威胁被利用之前引出它们。由于安全威胁评估是在分析中的系统的概念化模型上执行的,因此需要依靠人类的专业知识来详尽地得出所有可能的威胁。为此,威胁分析的结果取决于过程中涉及的个体行动者。然而,人类的专业知识可能会因某些或多种人为因素而产生偏见。[目标:]通过这项工作,我们旨在揭示人为因素(如性别、年龄、资历、教育背景、国籍)对安全风险评估的影响(如果有的话)。[方法:]为了对这一知识体系有所贡献,我们正在进行一项最新的文献综述,并在安全和风险评估领域与人类参与者(专家和非专家)进行了几次实验。首先,对主题和技术领域进行了概述。其次,介绍正在进行的文献综述的初步结果。最后,研究计划是描述包括研究问题,治疗和参与者招募。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Towards Unveiling Effects Of Human Factors Within Security Risk Assessment
[Background:] Security-by-design techniques (e.g., STRIDE) are used to elicit system threats before they are exploited. Since security threat assessment is performed on a conceptualised model of the system under analysis, human expertise is relied upon to exhaustively elicit all possible threats. To this end, the outcomes of threat analysis depend on the individual actors involved in the process. However, human expertise can be biased depending on certain or a combination of human factors. [Goal:] With this work, we aim to unveil the effect (if any) of human factors (e.g., gender, age, seniority, educational background, nationality) to security risk assessment. [Method:] To contribute to this body of knowledge, we are conducting a state-of-the-art literature review and several experiments with human participants (experts and non-experts) in the domain of security and risk assessment. First, the topic and technical domain are described in general. Second, preliminary results of the on-going literature review are presented. Finally, a research plan is described including research questions, treatment, and participant recruitment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Report from the 14th International Workshop on Automating Test Case Design, Selection, and Evaluation (A-TEST 2023) What Does the World's Biggest Tech Event Tell Us? Key Pointers from CES 2024 Passages Women and Software Engineering Column: Is Theory (Still) Welcome in Software Engineering Research?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1