教材与语料库中的提问问题分析

Rika Mutiara
{"title":"教材与语料库中的提问问题分析","authors":"Rika Mutiara","doi":"10.22216/KATA.V3I1.3918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study examined the occurrences of asking opinions in the textbook and the ones in the British National Corpus (BNC). Because the expressions in the textbook occur in isolation, it does not give sufficient context in which the expressions occur. For instance, there are no strategies that the speakers use to make the hearers understand their questions. According to Relevance theory, the speakers tried to give relevant input to the hearers in order to obtain the goal of communication (Wilson & Sperber, 2008). Therefore, the present study analyzed expressions of asking opinions in BNC to provide what strategies the speakers use in order to make the questions relevant for the hearers. A corpus-assisted discourse study was conducted to find the strategies. The strategies were analyzed on the light of Relevance theory. It was found that some expressions were not found in BNC. The speakers applied several strategies namely introducing, asking more questions, giving options, and elaborating.  They provide relevant information when asking questions. When the speakers did not get hearers’ opinions, they tried to give more information or options to elicit hearers’ responses. ","PeriodicalId":159474,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal KATA","volume":"66 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of Asking Opinions in The Textbook and Corpora\",\"authors\":\"Rika Mutiara\",\"doi\":\"10.22216/KATA.V3I1.3918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study examined the occurrences of asking opinions in the textbook and the ones in the British National Corpus (BNC). Because the expressions in the textbook occur in isolation, it does not give sufficient context in which the expressions occur. For instance, there are no strategies that the speakers use to make the hearers understand their questions. According to Relevance theory, the speakers tried to give relevant input to the hearers in order to obtain the goal of communication (Wilson & Sperber, 2008). Therefore, the present study analyzed expressions of asking opinions in BNC to provide what strategies the speakers use in order to make the questions relevant for the hearers. A corpus-assisted discourse study was conducted to find the strategies. The strategies were analyzed on the light of Relevance theory. It was found that some expressions were not found in BNC. The speakers applied several strategies namely introducing, asking more questions, giving options, and elaborating.  They provide relevant information when asking questions. When the speakers did not get hearers’ opinions, they tried to give more information or options to elicit hearers’ responses. \",\"PeriodicalId\":159474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal KATA\",\"volume\":\"66 4\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal KATA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22216/KATA.V3I1.3918\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal KATA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22216/KATA.V3I1.3918","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究调查了教科书和英国国家语料库(BNC)中询问意见的出现情况。由于教科书中的表达式是单独出现的,因此没有给出这些表达式出现的充分背景。例如,说话者没有使用任何策略来让听者理解他们的问题。根据关联理论,说话者试图向听者提供相关的输入,以达到沟通的目的(Wilson & Sperber, 2008)。因此,本研究分析了BNC中询问意见的表达方式,以提供说话者使用哪些策略使问题与听者相关。通过语料库辅助语篇研究来寻找策略。运用关联理论对这些策略进行了分析。BNC中未发现部分表达。演讲者运用了介绍、提问、选择、阐述等策略。他们在提问时提供相关信息。当演讲者没有得到听众的意见时,他们试图提供更多的信息或选择来引起听众的反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of Asking Opinions in The Textbook and Corpora
The study examined the occurrences of asking opinions in the textbook and the ones in the British National Corpus (BNC). Because the expressions in the textbook occur in isolation, it does not give sufficient context in which the expressions occur. For instance, there are no strategies that the speakers use to make the hearers understand their questions. According to Relevance theory, the speakers tried to give relevant input to the hearers in order to obtain the goal of communication (Wilson & Sperber, 2008). Therefore, the present study analyzed expressions of asking opinions in BNC to provide what strategies the speakers use in order to make the questions relevant for the hearers. A corpus-assisted discourse study was conducted to find the strategies. The strategies were analyzed on the light of Relevance theory. It was found that some expressions were not found in BNC. The speakers applied several strategies namely introducing, asking more questions, giving options, and elaborating.  They provide relevant information when asking questions. When the speakers did not get hearers’ opinions, they tried to give more information or options to elicit hearers’ responses. 
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
ERROR ANALYSIS OF KOREAN PARTICLE-PREDICATE COLLOCATION BY INDONESIAN SPEAKERS TEMPORARY WORKER ALIENATION IN HIROKO OYAMADA’S NOVEL KOUJOU TOUR GUIDE ATTITUDE AND TOURIST RESPONSE IN VIRTUAL TOUR: APPRAISAL ANALYSIS THE MEANING OF ADVICE SIGNS IN DIWAN ALI BIN ABI THALIB THE STUDY OF PRAGMATIC SEMIOTICS MAPPING METAPHORIC AND NATURALISTIC ECOLINGUISTIC DIMENSIONS IN LEARNING THE INDONESIAN LANGUAGE AT THE UNIVERSITY
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1