性别是否影响自然场景中物体分类的处理

Weiqiang Peng, Xin Wang, Dongjie Lang, Weina Zhu
{"title":"性别是否影响自然场景中物体分类的处理","authors":"Weiqiang Peng, Xin Wang, Dongjie Lang, Weina Zhu","doi":"10.1117/12.2671092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Humans can quickly and efficiently extract information from a complex natural scene. Rapid detection of animals is such an example, which is fast and accurate. We can see that animals have gender differences, and human beings also have gender differences, and they all appear in our real life. Therefore, we will use a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm (2AFC) to investigate the gender differences between the two targets. In our experiment, we balanced the various factors that could be taken into account and subjected the images to histogram equalization. We analyzed the reaction time of the subjects to stimuli of the target gender (male or female). We report two main findings. First, when the type of target (human or animal) was not considered, subjects had faster reaction times to male targets than to female targets. Second, gender differences were only significant for animals when the kind of object (human or animal) was considered.","PeriodicalId":227528,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE 2022)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does gender affect the processing of object classification in natural scenes\",\"authors\":\"Weiqiang Peng, Xin Wang, Dongjie Lang, Weina Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1117/12.2671092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Humans can quickly and efficiently extract information from a complex natural scene. Rapid detection of animals is such an example, which is fast and accurate. We can see that animals have gender differences, and human beings also have gender differences, and they all appear in our real life. Therefore, we will use a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm (2AFC) to investigate the gender differences between the two targets. In our experiment, we balanced the various factors that could be taken into account and subjected the images to histogram equalization. We analyzed the reaction time of the subjects to stimuli of the target gender (male or female). We report two main findings. First, when the type of target (human or animal) was not considered, subjects had faster reaction times to male targets than to female targets. Second, gender differences were only significant for animals when the kind of object (human or animal) was considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":227528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE 2022)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE 2022)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2671092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Engineering (ICAICE 2022)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2671092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类可以快速有效地从复杂的自然场景中提取信息。对动物的快速检测就是这样一个例子,它既快速又准确。我们可以看到,动物有性别差异,人类也有性别差异,它们都出现在我们的现实生活中。因此,我们将使用双选项强迫选择范式(2AFC)来研究两个目标之间的性别差异。在我们的实验中,我们平衡了各种可以考虑的因素,并对图像进行了直方图均衡化。我们分析了受试者对目标性别(男性或女性)刺激的反应时间。我们报告了两个主要发现。首先,当不考虑目标类型(人或动物)时,受试者对男性目标的反应速度比女性目标快。其次,性别差异只有在考虑对象类型(人或动物)时才对动物有意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Does gender affect the processing of object classification in natural scenes
Humans can quickly and efficiently extract information from a complex natural scene. Rapid detection of animals is such an example, which is fast and accurate. We can see that animals have gender differences, and human beings also have gender differences, and they all appear in our real life. Therefore, we will use a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm (2AFC) to investigate the gender differences between the two targets. In our experiment, we balanced the various factors that could be taken into account and subjected the images to histogram equalization. We analyzed the reaction time of the subjects to stimuli of the target gender (male or female). We report two main findings. First, when the type of target (human or animal) was not considered, subjects had faster reaction times to male targets than to female targets. Second, gender differences were only significant for animals when the kind of object (human or animal) was considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Hippocampus MRI diagnosis based on deep learning in application of preliminary screening of Alzheimer’s disease Global critic and local actor for campaign-tactic combat management in the joint operation simulation software Intelligent monitoring system of oil tank liquid level based on infrared thermal imaging Chinese named entity recognition incorporating syntactic information Object tracking based on foreground adaptive bounding box and motion state redetection
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1