物理治疗领域调查研究中损伤和残疾评估的可靠性。

E F van Triet, J Dekker, J J Kerssens, E C Curfs
{"title":"物理治疗领域调查研究中损伤和残疾评估的可靠性。","authors":"E F van Triet,&nbsp;J Dekker,&nbsp;J J Kerssens,&nbsp;E C Curfs","doi":"10.3109/03790799009166252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to evaluate the reliability of diagnostic assessment based on clinical observations by physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>interobserver studies between two pairs of physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>two primary-care physical therapy practices.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>all applying to the practices for treatment.</p><p><strong>Exclusions: </strong>physical therapy in previous 3 months, or need for acute treatment.</p><p><strong>Assessments: </strong>schedule derived from the ICIDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>agreement on disabilities better than on impairments, the latter revealing problems particularly with pain and restricted range of motion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>reliability of assessments of most of the categories considered was reliable; in two categories the reliability was poor, and the categories were modified.</p>","PeriodicalId":77547,"journal":{"name":"International disability studies","volume":"12 2","pages":"61-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790799009166252","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of the assessment of impairments and disabilities in survey research in the field of physical therapy.\",\"authors\":\"E F van Triet,&nbsp;J Dekker,&nbsp;J J Kerssens,&nbsp;E C Curfs\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/03790799009166252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>to evaluate the reliability of diagnostic assessment based on clinical observations by physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>interobserver studies between two pairs of physical therapists.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>two primary-care physical therapy practices.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>all applying to the practices for treatment.</p><p><strong>Exclusions: </strong>physical therapy in previous 3 months, or need for acute treatment.</p><p><strong>Assessments: </strong>schedule derived from the ICIDH.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>agreement on disabilities better than on impairments, the latter revealing problems particularly with pain and restricted range of motion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>reliability of assessments of most of the categories considered was reliable; in two categories the reliability was poor, and the categories were modified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International disability studies\",\"volume\":\"12 2\",\"pages\":\"61-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3109/03790799009166252\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International disability studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799009166252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International disability studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/03790799009166252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

目的:评价物理治疗师基于临床观察的诊断评估的可靠性。设计:两对物理治疗师之间的观察者间研究。设置:两个初级保健物理治疗实践。患者:均向执业医师申请治疗。排除:近3个月内进行过物理治疗或需要急症治疗者。评估:根据ICIDH制定的时间表。结果:关于残疾的共识比关于损伤的共识更好,后者揭示了特别是疼痛和活动范围受限的问题。结论:所考虑的大多数类别的评估信度是可靠的;在两个类别中信度较差,并对类别进行了修改。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reliability of the assessment of impairments and disabilities in survey research in the field of physical therapy.

Objective: to evaluate the reliability of diagnostic assessment based on clinical observations by physical therapists.

Design: interobserver studies between two pairs of physical therapists.

Setting: two primary-care physical therapy practices.

Patients: all applying to the practices for treatment.

Exclusions: physical therapy in previous 3 months, or need for acute treatment.

Assessments: schedule derived from the ICIDH.

Results: agreement on disabilities better than on impairments, the latter revealing problems particularly with pain and restricted range of motion.

Conclusions: reliability of assessments of most of the categories considered was reliable; in two categories the reliability was poor, and the categories were modified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitation in Hansen's disease. Coping strategies of chronically ill adolescents and their parents. Potential for alterations in family process: when a family has a child with cystic fibrosis. Impact of traumatic brain damage on family dynamics and functioning: a review. Holter monitoring in the evaluation and rehabilitation of post-cerebrovascular accident patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1