印度人的正常平均口腔温度:华氏98.0度

Nitin Kumar, Kavya Ronanki, P. Panda, M. Kapoor, Yogesh Singh, A. Bhadoria
{"title":"印度人的正常平均口腔温度:华氏98.0度","authors":"Nitin Kumar, Kavya Ronanki, P. Panda, M. Kapoor, Yogesh Singh, A. Bhadoria","doi":"10.4103/jme.jme_55_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To find out the normal mean oral temperature in the Indian population as per a longitudinal study. Background: 98.6°F is generally accepted as normal body temperature as defined by Wunderlich (1868) and later challenged by Mackowiak (1992) and Protsiv (2020) who concluded it as 98.2°F based on cross-sectional studies. Hence, the normal body temperature at present needs quantification as per a longitudinal study in Indians. Patients and Methods: A longitudinal study on the healthy population of Northern India was followed-up over 1 year. Participants were advised for self-monitoring of oral temperature with a standard digital thermometer in either left or right sublingual pocket and record it in the thermometry diary. The study was considered complete if the participant had all three phases of the study (i.e., non-febrile, febrile and post-febrile phases) or completed the duration of the study. Results: The mean oral temperature of the participants (n = 144) during the non-febrile and post-febrile phases (temperature readings = 6543) were 98.0°F (standard deviation [SD], 0.61) and 98.01°F (SD, 0.60), respectively (P < 0.001). With the diurnal variability, the morning (am), noon (an) and afternoon (pm) mean temperatures were 97.91°F, 98.08°F and 98.27°F (P < 0.001), respectively, during the non-febrile phase. Similar trends were observed in variability among men and women, seasons and across post-febrile phase. Conclusions: The mean oral temperature was 98.0°F (SD, 0.61). The temperature was as low as 96.9°F and as high as 99.1°F. The temperature during the post-febrile phase was found to be higher than the non-febrile phase temperature such as pm over an and am, women over men, summer over other seasons in the non-febrile phase and spring over others in the post-febrile phase.","PeriodicalId":251651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Evidence","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normal mean oral temperature in Indians: 98.0°F\",\"authors\":\"Nitin Kumar, Kavya Ronanki, P. Panda, M. Kapoor, Yogesh Singh, A. Bhadoria\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jme.jme_55_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To find out the normal mean oral temperature in the Indian population as per a longitudinal study. Background: 98.6°F is generally accepted as normal body temperature as defined by Wunderlich (1868) and later challenged by Mackowiak (1992) and Protsiv (2020) who concluded it as 98.2°F based on cross-sectional studies. Hence, the normal body temperature at present needs quantification as per a longitudinal study in Indians. Patients and Methods: A longitudinal study on the healthy population of Northern India was followed-up over 1 year. Participants were advised for self-monitoring of oral temperature with a standard digital thermometer in either left or right sublingual pocket and record it in the thermometry diary. The study was considered complete if the participant had all three phases of the study (i.e., non-febrile, febrile and post-febrile phases) or completed the duration of the study. Results: The mean oral temperature of the participants (n = 144) during the non-febrile and post-febrile phases (temperature readings = 6543) were 98.0°F (standard deviation [SD], 0.61) and 98.01°F (SD, 0.60), respectively (P < 0.001). With the diurnal variability, the morning (am), noon (an) and afternoon (pm) mean temperatures were 97.91°F, 98.08°F and 98.27°F (P < 0.001), respectively, during the non-febrile phase. Similar trends were observed in variability among men and women, seasons and across post-febrile phase. Conclusions: The mean oral temperature was 98.0°F (SD, 0.61). The temperature was as low as 96.9°F and as high as 99.1°F. The temperature during the post-febrile phase was found to be higher than the non-febrile phase temperature such as pm over an and am, women over men, summer over other seasons in the non-febrile phase and spring over others in the post-febrile phase.\",\"PeriodicalId\":251651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Evidence\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Evidence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jme.jme_55_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jme.jme_55_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:根据一项纵向研究,找出印度人口的正常平均口腔温度。背景:Wunderlich(1868)定义的98.6°F是普遍接受的正常体温,后来Mackowiak(1992)和Protsiv(2020)通过横断面研究得出98.2°F是正常体温。因此,根据印度人的纵向研究,目前的正常体温需要量化。患者和方法:对印度北部健康人群进行了1年以上的纵向随访研究。建议参与者在左侧或右侧舌下口袋中使用标准数字温度计自我监测口腔温度,并将其记录在测温日记中。如果参与者完成了研究的所有三个阶段(即无发热、发热和发热后阶段)或完成了研究的持续时间,则认为研究完成了。结果:受试者(n = 144)在非发热期和发热后(温度读数= 6543)的平均口腔温度分别为98.0°F(标准差[SD], 0.61)和98.01°F (SD, 0.60) (P < 0.001)。在非发热期,上午(am)、中午(an)和下午(pm)的平均气温分别为97.91°F、98.08°F和98.27°F (P < 0.001)。在男性和女性、季节和整个发热后阶段的变化中也观察到类似的趋势。结论:口腔平均温度为98.0°F (SD, 0.61)。气温最低为华氏96.9度,最高为华氏99.1度。发热后体温高于非发热期温度,如下午高于下午和上午,女性高于男性,夏季高于其他季节,春季高于其他季节在发热后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Normal mean oral temperature in Indians: 98.0°F
Aim: To find out the normal mean oral temperature in the Indian population as per a longitudinal study. Background: 98.6°F is generally accepted as normal body temperature as defined by Wunderlich (1868) and later challenged by Mackowiak (1992) and Protsiv (2020) who concluded it as 98.2°F based on cross-sectional studies. Hence, the normal body temperature at present needs quantification as per a longitudinal study in Indians. Patients and Methods: A longitudinal study on the healthy population of Northern India was followed-up over 1 year. Participants were advised for self-monitoring of oral temperature with a standard digital thermometer in either left or right sublingual pocket and record it in the thermometry diary. The study was considered complete if the participant had all three phases of the study (i.e., non-febrile, febrile and post-febrile phases) or completed the duration of the study. Results: The mean oral temperature of the participants (n = 144) during the non-febrile and post-febrile phases (temperature readings = 6543) were 98.0°F (standard deviation [SD], 0.61) and 98.01°F (SD, 0.60), respectively (P < 0.001). With the diurnal variability, the morning (am), noon (an) and afternoon (pm) mean temperatures were 97.91°F, 98.08°F and 98.27°F (P < 0.001), respectively, during the non-febrile phase. Similar trends were observed in variability among men and women, seasons and across post-febrile phase. Conclusions: The mean oral temperature was 98.0°F (SD, 0.61). The temperature was as low as 96.9°F and as high as 99.1°F. The temperature during the post-febrile phase was found to be higher than the non-febrile phase temperature such as pm over an and am, women over men, summer over other seasons in the non-febrile phase and spring over others in the post-febrile phase.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ghost Gall Bladder A Narrative Review on Dengue and COVID-19 Co-infection: A Deadly Duo National Medical Commission’s Generic Drug Policy: A Boon or a Bane for RMPs and Public Health? RESUSC-O: A Community Cardiopulmonary–Cerebral Resuscitation Provider App Impact of Foundation Course on First MBBS Students and Their Level of Satisfaction – A Programme Evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1