窄径种植体(ndi)支持固定假体在负重后颌的临床表现:一项系统综述

Yu-Chia Chang Yu-Chia Chang, Yu-Hao Yang Yu-Chia Chang, Chih-Ting Kao Yu-Hao Yang, Chen-Ying Wang Chih-Ting Kao
{"title":"窄径种植体(ndi)支持固定假体在负重后颌的临床表现:一项系统综述","authors":"Yu-Chia Chang Yu-Chia Chang, Yu-Hao Yang Yu-Chia Chang, Chih-Ting Kao Yu-Hao Yang, Chen-Ying Wang Chih-Ting Kao","doi":"10.53106/261634032022090502005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Abstract: Objectives: Narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) may serve as a feasible treatment alternative for the rehabilitation of specific cases. The aim of this review article was to assess the clinical outcomes of restoring stress-bearing posterior edentulous ridges with NDIs. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and enriched by hand search. Prospective and retrospective clinical studies, from January 2000 to November 2021, with at least 10 patients and a follow-up period of at least 1-year after functional loading, were included. Marginal bone level (MBL) and implant survival/success rate were set as primary outcome variables. Results: From the initially identified 2,401 articles, 17 clinical studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Of the selected studies, mean MBL after loading was within 2 mm at different time intervals up to 10 years. Recorded implant survival rate was 92.6-100%, 95.3-100%, 95.3-100%, and 95.1-97.9% after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year, respectively, while success rate was 92.6-100%, 95-100%, and 95% at 1, 3, and 10 years. Biological and prosthetic complications were observed. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, it could be concluded that the use of NDIs for rehabilitation of posterior jaws is a viable treatment alternative, with comparable MBL and implant survival/success rate to standard-diameter implants (SDIs).\n \n","PeriodicalId":150986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Performance of Narrow-diameter Implants (NDIs) Supporting Fixed Prostheses in Stress-bearing Posterior Jaws: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Chia Chang Yu-Chia Chang, Yu-Hao Yang Yu-Chia Chang, Chih-Ting Kao Yu-Hao Yang, Chen-Ying Wang Chih-Ting Kao\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/261634032022090502005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Abstract: Objectives: Narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) may serve as a feasible treatment alternative for the rehabilitation of specific cases. The aim of this review article was to assess the clinical outcomes of restoring stress-bearing posterior edentulous ridges with NDIs. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and enriched by hand search. Prospective and retrospective clinical studies, from January 2000 to November 2021, with at least 10 patients and a follow-up period of at least 1-year after functional loading, were included. Marginal bone level (MBL) and implant survival/success rate were set as primary outcome variables. Results: From the initially identified 2,401 articles, 17 clinical studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Of the selected studies, mean MBL after loading was within 2 mm at different time intervals up to 10 years. Recorded implant survival rate was 92.6-100%, 95.3-100%, 95.3-100%, and 95.1-97.9% after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year, respectively, while success rate was 92.6-100%, 95-100%, and 95% at 1, 3, and 10 years. Biological and prosthetic complications were observed. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, it could be concluded that the use of NDIs for rehabilitation of posterior jaws is a viable treatment alternative, with comparable MBL and implant survival/success rate to standard-diameter implants (SDIs).\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":150986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022090502005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022090502005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:目的:窄径种植体(ndi)可能是一种可行的治疗方案,可用于特定病例的康复。这篇综述文章的目的是评估使用ndi修复承受应力的无牙后牙脊的临床结果。材料与方法:在MEDLINE/PubMed和Cochrane图书馆数据库中进行电子检索,并辅以人工检索。前瞻性和回顾性临床研究,从2000年1月到2021年11月,至少有10例患者,在功能负荷后随访至少1年。边缘骨水平(MBL)和种植体存活/成功率作为主要结果变量。结果:从最初确定的2401篇文章中,17项临床研究符合纳入标准并被纳入。在所选择的研究中,加载后的平均MBL在长达10年的不同时间间隔内均在2毫米以内。1年、3年、5年、10年的种植体存活率分别为92.6-100%、95.3-100%、95.3-100%、95.1-97.9%,1年、3年、10年的成功率分别为92.6-100%、95-100%、95%。观察生物并发症和假体并发症。结论:在本研究的限制下,可以得出结论,使用ndi进行后颌骨康复是一种可行的治疗选择,与标准直径种植体(sdi)相比,MBL和种植体存活率/成功率相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Performance of Narrow-diameter Implants (NDIs) Supporting Fixed Prostheses in Stress-bearing Posterior Jaws: A Systematic Review
Abstract: Objectives: Narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) may serve as a feasible treatment alternative for the rehabilitation of specific cases. The aim of this review article was to assess the clinical outcomes of restoring stress-bearing posterior edentulous ridges with NDIs. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and enriched by hand search. Prospective and retrospective clinical studies, from January 2000 to November 2021, with at least 10 patients and a follow-up period of at least 1-year after functional loading, were included. Marginal bone level (MBL) and implant survival/success rate were set as primary outcome variables. Results: From the initially identified 2,401 articles, 17 clinical studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Of the selected studies, mean MBL after loading was within 2 mm at different time intervals up to 10 years. Recorded implant survival rate was 92.6-100%, 95.3-100%, 95.3-100%, and 95.1-97.9% after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year, respectively, while success rate was 92.6-100%, 95-100%, and 95% at 1, 3, and 10 years. Biological and prosthetic complications were observed. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, it could be concluded that the use of NDIs for rehabilitation of posterior jaws is a viable treatment alternative, with comparable MBL and implant survival/success rate to standard-diameter implants (SDIs).  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modified Coronally Advanced Tunnel (MCAT) Technique with or without Vestibular Incision for the Treatment of Multiple Gingival Recessions: A Case Series and Literature Review Reporting Quality of Review Abstracts in Journal of the Taiwan Academy of Periodontology: An assessment using the PRISMA for Abstracts Guidelines Reconstruction of the Atrophic Ridge with Staged approaches with the Autogenous Bone Block and Dental Implant: Case Reports and Literature Review Alveolar Ridge Preservation with The Use of Demineralized Bone Matrix Putty: Clinical, Radiographic and Histological Observations in A Case Series Factors Associated with Oral Health and Oral Hygiene Status in Long Term Care Facilities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1