Yu-Chia Chang Yu-Chia Chang, Yu-Hao Yang Yu-Chia Chang, Chih-Ting Kao Yu-Hao Yang, Chen-Ying Wang Chih-Ting Kao
{"title":"窄径种植体(ndi)支持固定假体在负重后颌的临床表现:一项系统综述","authors":"Yu-Chia Chang Yu-Chia Chang, Yu-Hao Yang Yu-Chia Chang, Chih-Ting Kao Yu-Hao Yang, Chen-Ying Wang Chih-Ting Kao","doi":"10.53106/261634032022090502005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Abstract: Objectives: Narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) may serve as a feasible treatment alternative for the rehabilitation of specific cases. The aim of this review article was to assess the clinical outcomes of restoring stress-bearing posterior edentulous ridges with NDIs. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and enriched by hand search. Prospective and retrospective clinical studies, from January 2000 to November 2021, with at least 10 patients and a follow-up period of at least 1-year after functional loading, were included. Marginal bone level (MBL) and implant survival/success rate were set as primary outcome variables. Results: From the initially identified 2,401 articles, 17 clinical studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Of the selected studies, mean MBL after loading was within 2 mm at different time intervals up to 10 years. Recorded implant survival rate was 92.6-100%, 95.3-100%, 95.3-100%, and 95.1-97.9% after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year, respectively, while success rate was 92.6-100%, 95-100%, and 95% at 1, 3, and 10 years. Biological and prosthetic complications were observed. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, it could be concluded that the use of NDIs for rehabilitation of posterior jaws is a viable treatment alternative, with comparable MBL and implant survival/success rate to standard-diameter implants (SDIs).\n \n","PeriodicalId":150986,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Performance of Narrow-diameter Implants (NDIs) Supporting Fixed Prostheses in Stress-bearing Posterior Jaws: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Yu-Chia Chang Yu-Chia Chang, Yu-Hao Yang Yu-Chia Chang, Chih-Ting Kao Yu-Hao Yang, Chen-Ying Wang Chih-Ting Kao\",\"doi\":\"10.53106/261634032022090502005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Abstract: Objectives: Narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) may serve as a feasible treatment alternative for the rehabilitation of specific cases. The aim of this review article was to assess the clinical outcomes of restoring stress-bearing posterior edentulous ridges with NDIs. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and enriched by hand search. Prospective and retrospective clinical studies, from January 2000 to November 2021, with at least 10 patients and a follow-up period of at least 1-year after functional loading, were included. Marginal bone level (MBL) and implant survival/success rate were set as primary outcome variables. Results: From the initially identified 2,401 articles, 17 clinical studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Of the selected studies, mean MBL after loading was within 2 mm at different time intervals up to 10 years. Recorded implant survival rate was 92.6-100%, 95.3-100%, 95.3-100%, and 95.1-97.9% after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year, respectively, while success rate was 92.6-100%, 95-100%, and 95% at 1, 3, and 10 years. Biological and prosthetic complications were observed. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, it could be concluded that the use of NDIs for rehabilitation of posterior jaws is a viable treatment alternative, with comparable MBL and implant survival/success rate to standard-diameter implants (SDIs).\\n \\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":150986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022090502005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/261634032022090502005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clinical Performance of Narrow-diameter Implants (NDIs) Supporting Fixed Prostheses in Stress-bearing Posterior Jaws: A Systematic Review
Abstract: Objectives: Narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) may serve as a feasible treatment alternative for the rehabilitation of specific cases. The aim of this review article was to assess the clinical outcomes of restoring stress-bearing posterior edentulous ridges with NDIs. Materials and Methods: An electronic search was conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed and Cochrane Library databases and enriched by hand search. Prospective and retrospective clinical studies, from January 2000 to November 2021, with at least 10 patients and a follow-up period of at least 1-year after functional loading, were included. Marginal bone level (MBL) and implant survival/success rate were set as primary outcome variables. Results: From the initially identified 2,401 articles, 17 clinical studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included. Of the selected studies, mean MBL after loading was within 2 mm at different time intervals up to 10 years. Recorded implant survival rate was 92.6-100%, 95.3-100%, 95.3-100%, and 95.1-97.9% after 1-, 3-, 5-, and 10-year, respectively, while success rate was 92.6-100%, 95-100%, and 95% at 1, 3, and 10 years. Biological and prosthetic complications were observed. Conclusions: Within the limitation of the present study, it could be concluded that the use of NDIs for rehabilitation of posterior jaws is a viable treatment alternative, with comparable MBL and implant survival/success rate to standard-diameter implants (SDIs).