巴西高等教育中远程教育监管的挑战:结构、对话和机构自治

Sérgio Hage Fialho, M. Barros, M. Rangel
{"title":"巴西高等教育中远程教育监管的挑战:结构、对话和机构自治","authors":"Sérgio Hage Fialho, M. Barros, M. Rangel","doi":"10.21714/2178-8030GEP.V.20.5706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study discusses the relationship between the normative set that regulates distance education in higher education in Brazil, and essential requirements for the pedagogical quality of the courses. Methodologically, it establishes, based on the literature, central concepts to determine the pedagogical quality in EAD - Dialogue, Structure and Institutional Autonomy -, and applies these concepts to the analysis of a normative document base of the federal regulation (1996 to 2018). The conclusions indicate that two essential pedagogical issues are not addressed in the regulation: the guarantee of adequate teacher-student interactivity (there is no objective metric that prevents the formation of groups with a high number of students per tutor) and the possibility of attending to the specificities of the students and their social context (there is no specific regulatory incentive for the contents and activities of the course to be customized by the teacher throughout the teaching-learning process).","PeriodicalId":288834,"journal":{"name":"Gestão & Planejamento","volume":"20 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Desafios da regulação da EAD no ensino superior no Brasil: Estrutura, diálogo e autonomia institucional\",\"authors\":\"Sérgio Hage Fialho, M. Barros, M. Rangel\",\"doi\":\"10.21714/2178-8030GEP.V.20.5706\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study discusses the relationship between the normative set that regulates distance education in higher education in Brazil, and essential requirements for the pedagogical quality of the courses. Methodologically, it establishes, based on the literature, central concepts to determine the pedagogical quality in EAD - Dialogue, Structure and Institutional Autonomy -, and applies these concepts to the analysis of a normative document base of the federal regulation (1996 to 2018). The conclusions indicate that two essential pedagogical issues are not addressed in the regulation: the guarantee of adequate teacher-student interactivity (there is no objective metric that prevents the formation of groups with a high number of students per tutor) and the possibility of attending to the specificities of the students and their social context (there is no specific regulatory incentive for the contents and activities of the course to be customized by the teacher throughout the teaching-learning process).\",\"PeriodicalId\":288834,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gestão & Planejamento\",\"volume\":\"20 11\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gestão & Planejamento\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21714/2178-8030GEP.V.20.5706\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestão & Planejamento","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21714/2178-8030GEP.V.20.5706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究探讨了规范巴西高等教育远程教育的规范集与课程教学质量的基本要求之间的关系。在方法上,它根据文献建立了确定EAD教学质量的核心概念-对话,结构和机构自治-并将这些概念应用于联邦法规(1996年至2018年)的规范性文件基础的分析。结论表明,该条例没有解决两个基本的教学问题:保证充分的师生互动(没有客观的衡量标准来防止每个导师形成大量学生的群体)和照顾学生的特殊性及其社会背景的可能性(在整个教与学的过程中,没有特定的监管激励来要求教师定制课程的内容和活动)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Desafios da regulação da EAD no ensino superior no Brasil: Estrutura, diálogo e autonomia institucional
This study discusses the relationship between the normative set that regulates distance education in higher education in Brazil, and essential requirements for the pedagogical quality of the courses. Methodologically, it establishes, based on the literature, central concepts to determine the pedagogical quality in EAD - Dialogue, Structure and Institutional Autonomy -, and applies these concepts to the analysis of a normative document base of the federal regulation (1996 to 2018). The conclusions indicate that two essential pedagogical issues are not addressed in the regulation: the guarantee of adequate teacher-student interactivity (there is no objective metric that prevents the formation of groups with a high number of students per tutor) and the possibility of attending to the specificities of the students and their social context (there is no specific regulatory incentive for the contents and activities of the course to be customized by the teacher throughout the teaching-learning process).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
COMPREENDENDO A INOVAÇÃO ABERTA A PARTIR DOS ESTUDOS BASEADOS EM PRÁTICA STAKEHOLDERS' MANAGEMENT CAPACITY IN BRAZILIAN NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS ANÁLISE DA ADESÃO DA RESPONSABILIDADE SOCIAL CORPORATIVA (RSC) EM EMPRESAS DO NOROESTE GAÚCHO OBSOLESCÊNCIA PROGRAMADA E PERCEBIDA: UM LEVANTAMENTO SOBRE A PERCEPÇÃO DO CICLO DE VIDA COM USUÁRIOS DE APARELHOS CELULARES MÍDIA E MANAGEMENT: A (DES)CONSTRUÇÃO SOCIAL DA IMAGEM DE EIKE BATISTA ENQUANTO EXECUTIVO DE SUCESSO
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1