学生写描写性课文时的错误分析

Endah Luthfiyah, C. Sutarsyah, B. burhanuddin
{"title":"学生写描写性课文时的错误分析","authors":"Endah Luthfiyah, C. Sutarsyah, B. burhanuddin","doi":"10.23960/ujet.v10.i3.2021x2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aims to find out the types of errors made by students in their descriptive text writing, the dominant errors made by the students, and to know students’ perception toward their error in writing. Moreover, this study used a descriptive qualitative study. In collecting the data, the researcher used a writing test and a written interview. The result of this study showed that students made 418 errors in writing descriptive text, they are organization 10 errors (2.4%), vocabulary 70 errors (16.7%), grammar 9 errors (2.2%), mechanic 162 errors (38.8%), omission 62 errors (14.8%), addition 74 errors (17.7%), misformation 23 errors (5.5%), and misordering 8 errors (1.9%). Based on the result, the mechanic was the dominant error that occurred in students’ writing. In addition, based on students' written interview result, the errors that students made were cause by their ignorance and lack of knowledge in writing. The purposes of this research were to know the errors made by students in writing then; the students will be motivated to continue learning so as not to make the same errors. Keywords: Error analysis, Writing, Descriptive Text, Students’ Perception","PeriodicalId":300659,"journal":{"name":"U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An analysis of students' errors in writing descriptive text\",\"authors\":\"Endah Luthfiyah, C. Sutarsyah, B. burhanuddin\",\"doi\":\"10.23960/ujet.v10.i3.2021x2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research aims to find out the types of errors made by students in their descriptive text writing, the dominant errors made by the students, and to know students’ perception toward their error in writing. Moreover, this study used a descriptive qualitative study. In collecting the data, the researcher used a writing test and a written interview. The result of this study showed that students made 418 errors in writing descriptive text, they are organization 10 errors (2.4%), vocabulary 70 errors (16.7%), grammar 9 errors (2.2%), mechanic 162 errors (38.8%), omission 62 errors (14.8%), addition 74 errors (17.7%), misformation 23 errors (5.5%), and misordering 8 errors (1.9%). Based on the result, the mechanic was the dominant error that occurred in students’ writing. In addition, based on students' written interview result, the errors that students made were cause by their ignorance and lack of knowledge in writing. The purposes of this research were to know the errors made by students in writing then; the students will be motivated to continue learning so as not to make the same errors. Keywords: Error analysis, Writing, Descriptive Text, Students’ Perception\",\"PeriodicalId\":300659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23960/ujet.v10.i3.2021x2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U-Jet: Unila Journal of English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23960/ujet.v10.i3.2021x2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在了解学生在描述性文本写作中所犯的错误类型,学生所犯的主要错误,了解学生对写作错误的认知。此外,本研究采用描述性定性研究。在收集数据时,研究者使用了写作测试和书面访谈。本研究结果表明,学生在写作描述文本中出现418个错误,其中组织错误10个(2.4%),词汇错误70个(16.7%),语法错误9个(2.2%),机制错误162个(38.8%),省略错误62个(14.8%),添加错误74个(17.7%),曲解错误23个(5.5%),顺序错误8个(1.9%)。根据结果,机械性是学生写作中出现的主要错误。此外,根据学生的书面面试结果,学生所犯的错误是由于他们对写作的无知和缺乏知识造成的。本研究的目的是了解学生在写作中所犯的错误;学生将被激励继续学习,以免犯同样的错误。关键词:错误分析,写作,描述性文本,学生感知
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An analysis of students' errors in writing descriptive text
This research aims to find out the types of errors made by students in their descriptive text writing, the dominant errors made by the students, and to know students’ perception toward their error in writing. Moreover, this study used a descriptive qualitative study. In collecting the data, the researcher used a writing test and a written interview. The result of this study showed that students made 418 errors in writing descriptive text, they are organization 10 errors (2.4%), vocabulary 70 errors (16.7%), grammar 9 errors (2.2%), mechanic 162 errors (38.8%), omission 62 errors (14.8%), addition 74 errors (17.7%), misformation 23 errors (5.5%), and misordering 8 errors (1.9%). Based on the result, the mechanic was the dominant error that occurred in students’ writing. In addition, based on students' written interview result, the errors that students made were cause by their ignorance and lack of knowledge in writing. The purposes of this research were to know the errors made by students in writing then; the students will be motivated to continue learning so as not to make the same errors. Keywords: Error analysis, Writing, Descriptive Text, Students’ Perception
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Improving students' writing achievement in descriptive text through FRESH technique at the first grade of SMPN 32 Bekasi The implementation of Mind mapping technique in teaching reading comprehension The implementation of Guessing Game technique in teaching speaking Improving Students Reading Comprehension Through Information Gap Technique Vocabulary Mastery in Different Language Learning Strategies of The Beginner Language Learners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1